András Vereckei1, Zsuzsanna Szelényi2, Valentina Kutyifa3, Endre Zima2, Gábor Szénási4, Melinda Kiss1, Gábor Katona1, István Karádi1, Béla Merkely2. 1. 3rd Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Kútvölgyi út 4, Budapest, Hungary 1125. 2. Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor u. 68, Budapest, Hungary 1122. 3. University of Rochester Medical Center, Cardiology Division, Heart Research Follow-up Program, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Box 653, Rochester NY, 14642, USA. 4. Institute of Pathophysiology, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, Budapest, Hungary, 1089.
Abstract
Aims: We hypothesized that the greater the intra- or interventricular dyssynchrony (intraD, interD), the more effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is. We sought to improve patient selection for CRT by using novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria. Methods and results: Left ventricular (LV) intraD was estimated by the absolute time difference between the intrinsicoid deflections (ID) in leads aVL and aVF divided by the QRS duration (QRSd): [aVLID - aVFID]/QRSd (%). InterD was estimated from the formula: [V5ID - V1ID]/QRSd (%). Their >25% value indicated electrical dyssynchrony present (ED+) and ≤25% value electrical dyssynchrony absent (ED-) diagnoses. Using the intraD + interD criteria (intra + interDC) together, if at least one of them indicated ED+ diagnosis, a final ED+ diagnosis, if both indicated ED- diagnosis, a final ED- diagnosis was made. Two authors, blinded to CRT response, retrospectively analysed pre-CRT ECGs of 124 patients with known CRT outcome. CRT response was defined as improvement of ≥ 1 NYHA class, being alive and having no hospitalizations for heart failure during 6 months of follow-up. 35/124 (28%) patients were non-responders (NRs), using the traditional criteria (TC) correct diagnosis was made in the remaining 89/124 (72%) responder (R) cases. The test accuracy (TA) of intra + interDC + TC [100/124 (81%), P < 0.001] was superior to that of TC [89/124 (72%)] due to its superior TA [36/43 (84%) vs. 29/43 (67%), respectively, P = 0.0156] in the non-specific intra-ventricular conduction disturbance (NICD) subgroup [43/124 (35%)]. In the left bundle branch block subgroup [70/124 (56%)] there was no between-criteria difference in TA. Conclusion: The intra + interDC + TC predicts clinical response after CRT more accurately than TC alone, due to greater TA in the NICD subgroup. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Aims: We hypothesized that the greater the intra- or interventricular dyssynchrony (intraD, interD), the more effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is. We sought to improve patient selection for CRT by using novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria. Methods and results: Left ventricular (LV) intraD was estimated by the absolute time difference between the intrinsicoid deflections (ID) in leads aVL and aVF divided by the QRS duration (QRSd): [aVLID - aVFID]/QRSd (%). InterD was estimated from the formula: [V5ID - V1ID]/QRSd (%). Their >25% value indicated electrical dyssynchrony present (ED+) and ≤25% value electrical dyssynchrony absent (ED-) diagnoses. Using the intraD + interD criteria (intra + interDC) together, if at least one of them indicated ED+ diagnosis, a final ED+ diagnosis, if both indicated ED- diagnosis, a final ED- diagnosis was made. Two authors, blinded to CRT response, retrospectively analysed pre-CRT ECGs of 124 patients with known CRT outcome. CRT response was defined as improvement of ≥ 1 NYHA class, being alive and having no hospitalizations for heart failure during 6 months of follow-up. 35/124 (28%) patients were non-responders (NRs), using the traditional criteria (TC) correct diagnosis was made in the remaining 89/124 (72%) responder (R) cases. The test accuracy (TA) of intra + interDC + TC [100/124 (81%), P < 0.001] was superior to that of TC [89/124 (72%)] due to its superior TA [36/43 (84%) vs. 29/43 (67%), respectively, P = 0.0156] in the non-specific intra-ventricular conduction disturbance (NICD) subgroup [43/124 (35%)]. In the left bundle branch block subgroup [70/124 (56%)] there was no between-criteria difference in TA. Conclusion: The intra + interDC + TC predicts clinical response after CRT more accurately than TC alone, due to greater TA in the NICD subgroup. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Christoffer Polcwiartek; Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Claus Graff; Peter L Sørensen; Joseph Kisslo; Zak Loring; Steen M Hansen; Kristian Kragholm; Bhupendar Tayal; Svend E Jensen; Peter Søgaard; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Brett D Atwater Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 1.976