| Literature DB >> 28011597 |
Thijs De Mulder1, Karen Goossens1, Nico Peiren1, Leen Vandaele1, Annelies Haegeman2, Caroline De Tender2, Tom Ruttink2, Tom Van de Wiele3, Sam De Campeneere1.
Abstract
The rumen microbiome occupies a central role in animal health and productivity. A better understanding of the rumen ecosystem is essential to increase productivity or decrease methane production. Samples were collected from the three main rumen environments: the solid-adherent fraction, the liquid fraction and the epithelium. For the liquid and solid fraction, two alternative sample processing protocols were compared, resulting in a total of five sample types: crude solids (S), the eluted solid-adherent fraction (Ad), free-living species in the crude rumen liquid (CRL), strained liquid samples (Lq) and epimural scrapings (Ep). The bacterial and methanogen communities of these sample types were analysed using 16S metabarcoding and qPCR. The results indicate that the liquid and solid-adherent environments are distinguished mainly by the differential abundance of specific taxonomic groups. Cellulolytic bacteria that pioneer biofilm formation, together with secondary colonisers are prevalent in solid-adherent samples, while dominant species in the fluid samples are primarily identified as consumers of soluble nutrients. Also, methanogen species are found to have a preference for either a solid-adherent or free-living occurrence. The epimural environment is characterised by a different microbial profile. Ten bacterial families and two methanogen genera are almost exclusively found in this environment. © FEMS 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.Entities:
Keywords: environments; epimural; methanogen; rumen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28011597 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.194