Literature DB >> 28011597

Exploring the methanogen and bacterial communities of rumen environments: solid adherent, fluid and epimural.

Thijs De Mulder1, Karen Goossens1, Nico Peiren1, Leen Vandaele1, Annelies Haegeman2, Caroline De Tender2, Tom Ruttink2, Tom Van de Wiele3, Sam De Campeneere1.   

Abstract

The rumen microbiome occupies a central role in animal health and productivity. A better understanding of the rumen ecosystem is essential to increase productivity or decrease methane production. Samples were collected from the three main rumen environments: the solid-adherent fraction, the liquid fraction and the epithelium. For the liquid and solid fraction, two alternative sample processing protocols were compared, resulting in a total of five sample types: crude solids (S), the eluted solid-adherent fraction (Ad), free-living species in the crude rumen liquid (CRL), strained liquid samples (Lq) and epimural scrapings (Ep). The bacterial and methanogen communities of these sample types were analysed using 16S metabarcoding and qPCR. The results indicate that the liquid and solid-adherent environments are distinguished mainly by the differential abundance of specific taxonomic groups. Cellulolytic bacteria that pioneer biofilm formation, together with secondary colonisers are prevalent in solid-adherent samples, while dominant species in the fluid samples are primarily identified as consumers of soluble nutrients. Also, methanogen species are found to have a preference for either a solid-adherent or free-living occurrence. The epimural environment is characterised by a different microbial profile. Ten bacterial families and two methanogen genera are almost exclusively found in this environment. © FEMS 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  environments; epimural; methanogen; rumen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28011597     DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  22 in total

1.  Validating the Use of Bovine Buccal Sampling as a Proxy for the Rumen Microbiota by Using a Time Course and Random Forest Classification Approach.

Authors:  Juliana Young; Joseph H Skarlupka; Madison S Cox; Rafael Tassinari Resende; Amelie Fischer; Kenneth F Kalscheur; Jennifer C McClure; John B Cole; Garret Suen; Derek M Bickhart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of trehalose supplementation in milk replacer on the incidence of diarrhea and fecal microbiota in preweaned calves.

Authors:  Hiroto Miura; Kazuhisa Mukai; Keigo Sudo; Satoshi Haga; Yutaka Suzuki; Yasuo Kobayashi; Satoshi Koike
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of ammonia fiber expansion-treated wheat straw and a recombinant fibrolytic enzyme on rumen microbiota and fermentation parameters, total tract digestibility, and performance of lambs.

Authors:  Gabriel O Ribeiro; Robert J Gruninger; Darryl R Jones; Karen A Beauchemin; Wen Zhu Yang; Yuxi Wang; D Wade Abbott; Adrian Tsang; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Synergistic Effects of 3-Nitrooxypropanol with Fumarate in the Regulation of Propionate Formation and Methanogenesis in Dairy Cows In Vitro.

Authors:  Zihao Liu; Kun Wang; Xuemei Nan; Meng Cai; Liang Yang; Benhai Xiong; Yiguang Zhao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Effect of trehalose supplementation in milk replacer on the incidence of diarrhea and fecal microbiota in preweaned calves.

Authors:  Hiroto Miura; Kazuhisa Mukai; Keigo Sudo; Satoshi Haga; Yutaka Suzuki; Yasuo Kobayashi; Satoshi Koike
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The Effect of DNA Extraction Methods on Observed Microbial Communities from Fibrous and Liquid Rumen Fractions of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Jueeli D Vaidya; Bartholomeus van den Bogert; Joan E Edwards; Jos Boekhorst; Sanne van Gastelen; Edoardo Saccenti; Caroline M Plugge; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Comparative Microbiome Analysis Reveals the Ecological Relationships Between Rumen Methanogens, Acetogens, and Their Hosts.

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; Xiaoxu Wang; Antton Alberdi; Jiabo Deng; Zhenyu Zhong; Huazhe Si; Chengli Zheng; Hanlin Zhou; Jianming Wang; Yifeng Yang; André-Denis G Wright; Shengyong Mao; Zhigang Zhang; Leluo Guan; Guangyu Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Influence of Season and Diet on Fiber Digestion and Bacterial Community Structure in the Rumen of Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus).

Authors:  Emilio M Ungerfeld; Mary Beth Leigh; Robert J Forster; Perry S Barboza
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-08-20

9.  Metatranscriptome Sequencing Reveals Insights into the Gene Expression and Functional Potential of Rumen Wall Bacteria.

Authors:  Evelyne Mann; Stefanie U Wetzels; Martin Wagner; Qendrim Zebeli; Stephan Schmitz-Esser
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Evaluation of Microbial Communities Associated With the Liquid and Solid Phases of the Rumen of Cattle Offered a Diet of Perennial Ryegrass or White Clover.

Authors:  Jenna M Bowen; Matthew S McCabe; Susan J Lister; Paul Cormican; Richard J Dewhurst
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.