Literature DB >> 28011431

Iron removal, energy consumption and operating cost of electrocoagulation of drinking water using a new flow column reactor.

Khalid S Hashim1, Andy Shaw2, Rafid Al Khaddar2, Montserrat Ortoneda Pedrola2, David Phipps2.   

Abstract

The goal of this project was to remove iron from drinking water using a new electrocoagulation (EC) cell. In this research, a flow column has been employed in the designing of a new electrocoagulation reactor (FCER) to achieve the planned target. Where, the water being treated flows through the perforated disc electrodes, thereby effectively mixing and aerating the water being treated. As a result, the stirring and aerating devices that until now have been widely used in the electrocoagulation reactors are unnecessary. The obtained results indicated that FCER reduced the iron concentration from 20 to 0.3 mg/L within 20 min of electrolysis at initial pH of 6, inter-electrode distance (ID) of 5 mm, current density (CD) of 1.5 mA/cm2, and minimum operating cost of 0.22 US $/m3. Additionally, it was found that FCER produces H2 gas enough to generate energy of 10.14 kW/m3. Statistically, it was found that the relationship between iron removal and operating parameters could be modelled with R2 of 0.86, and the influence of operating parameters on iron removal followed the order: C0>t>CD>pH. Finally, the SEM (scanning electron microscopy) images showed a large number of irregularities on the surface of anode due to the generation of aluminium hydroxides. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aluminium; Electrocoagulation; Empirical model; Iron; Operating cost; Perforated electrodes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011431     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

1.  Three-dimensional batch electrochemical coagulation (ECC) of health care facility wastewater-clean water reclamation.

Authors:  Sujit Singh; Shivaswamy Mahesh; Mahesh Sahana
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Fluorescence Quantum Yield Determination of Propylparaben Using Flow Injection Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kadhim Kh Hashim; Shatha Y Yahyaa; Asmaa A Mohmmed Al-Rashidy
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Goethite/montmorillonite adsorption coupled with electrocoagulation for improving fluoride removal from aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Jiali Kang; Junfeng Li; Chengxiao Ma; Lijuan Yi; Tiantian Gu; Jiankang Wang; Shenglin Liu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  Electrochemical Degradation of Methylene Blue by a Flexible Graphite Electrode: Techno-Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Aysegul Yagmur Goren; Yaşar Kemal Recepoğlu; Özge Edebali; Cagri Sahin; Mesut Genisoglu; Hatice Eser Okten
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-09-02

5.  Selective Removal of Iron, Lead, and Copper Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater by a Novel Cross-Linked Carbazole-Piperazine Copolymer.

Authors:  Majed Al Anazi; Ismail Abdulazeez; Othman Charles S Al Hamouz
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Removal of phosphate from River water using a new baffle plates electrochemical reactor.

Authors:  Khalid S Hashim; Ibijoke Adeola Idowu; Nisreen Jasim; Rafid Al Khaddar; Andy Shaw; David Phipps; P Kot; Montserrat Ortoneda Pedrola; Ali W Alattabi; Muhammad Abdulredha; Reham Alwash; K H Teng; Keyur H Joshi; Mohammed Hashim Aljefery
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2018-10-31

7.  The Removal of Residual Concentration of Hazardous Metals in Wastewater from a Neutralization Station Using Biosorbent-A Case Study Company Gutra, Czech Republic.

Authors:  Eva Pertile; Vojtech Vaclavik; Tomas Dvorsky; Silvie Heviankova
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.