Literature DB >> 28011323

Intensive Care Unit Monitoring After Pharyngeal Flap Surgery: Is It Necessary?

Sashank Reddy1, Srinivas Susarla2, Nance Yuan3, Gurjot Walia4, Danielle Rochlin5, Richard Redett6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of perioperative complications and the utility of intensive care monitoring in patients undergoing posterior pharyngeal flap surgery for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent posterior pharyngeal flap surgery for treatment of VPD and an assessment of the incidence of perioperative complications. Descriptive statistics were computed.
RESULTS: Over an 18-year period, 145 patients underwent pharyngeal flap surgery for VPD; 133 (91.7%) had complete data and were included as subjects. Mean patient age was 9.4 ± 7.4 years; 50.4% were female. One hundred twenty-six patients (94.7%) had a history of cleft palate. Thirty-four patients (25.5%) had asthma or obstructive sleep apnea. Eighty-three patients (62.4%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative monitoring. The average length of hospital stay was 1.9 ± 0.9 days (range, 1 to 5 days). There were no incidents of serious postoperative complications, including death, bleeding, flap dehiscence or loss, or airway compromise requiring reintubation. Two patients (1.5%) had perioperative complications related to respiratory issues, one of whom required readmission to the ICU (0.8%). There were no differences in complications between those who were routinely admitted to the ICU and those who went directly to the floor (P = 1.00). There was no association between respiratory comorbidities and complications (P = .06).
CONCLUSION: The perioperative complication rate for posterior pharyngeal flap surgery is low (<2%). Routine ICU admission for monitoring is not necessary.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011323     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  3 in total

1.  Rates of Revision and Obstructive Sleep Apnea after Surgery for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis of More Than 1000 Operations.

Authors:  Danielle H Rochlin; Clifford C Sheckter; Rohit K Khosla; H Peter Lorenz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 5.169

2.  Postoperative management of antithrombotic medication in microvascular head and neck reconstruction: a comparative analysis of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin.

Authors:  Matti Sievert; Miguel Goncalves; Rosalie Tamse; Sarina K Mueller; Michael Koch; Antoniu-Oreste Gostian; Heinrich Iro; Claudia Scherl
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Through-and-Through Dissection of the Soft Palate for Pharyngeal Flap Inset: A "Good-Fast-Cheap" Technique for Any Etiology of Velopharyngeal Incompetence.

Authors:  Michael Carr; Michaela Skarlicki; Sheryl Palm; Marija Bucevska; Jeffrey Bone; Arun K Gosain; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-06-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.