Literature DB >> 28009700

Silver Sulfadiazine Retards Wound Healing and Increases Hypertrophic Scarring in a Rabbit Ear Excisional Wound Model.

Li-Wu Qian1, Andrea B Fourcaudot, Kai P Leung.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of topical use of silver sulfadiazine cream (SSD) on wound healing and subsequent scarring in a rabbit ear wound model. Seven millimeter full-thickness excisional wounds were created in rabbit ears. Twenty-four rabbits were randomized into four groups in which each group received base cream, 0.01% SSD, 0.1% SSD, or 1% SSD, respectively. Each treatment was applied at 2-day intervals from postoperative days (PODs) 2 to 14. At POD 7, half of the rabbits from each group were killed and tissues were harvested to measure wound healing parameters that included epithelial gap and granulation area. At POD 28, the remaining rabbits from each group were assessed for hypertrophic scarring. Epithelial gaps in SSD-treated groups at concentrations of 0.1 and 1% were significantly larger than those of base cream-treated controls. In contrast, analysis of granulation areas that represent volume of granulation tissue formed during healing did not show any statistical differences between the base cream-treated group and all three SSD-treated groups. At POD 28, when compared to the base cream-treated group (1.44 ± 0.03), SSD-treated-groups (0.1 and 1%) had more (P < .05) hypertrophic scar formation (scar elevation index = 1.65 ± 0.04, 0.1%; 1.63 ± 0.06, 1%). The results of this study demonstrate that SSD treatment contributes not only to impaired reepithelialization but also to a greater hypertrophic scar formation. These results also indicate that caution should be exercised when using SSD clinically to prevent or treat wound infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28009700     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  7 in total

Review 1.  Toll-Like Receptor Signaling in Burn Wound Healing and Scarring.

Authors:  Peter D'Arpa; Kai P Leung
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Biobrane™ versus acticoat™ for the treatment of mid-dermal pediatric burns: a prospective randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Ela J Hyland; Rachel D'Cruz; Seema Menon; John G Harvey; Erik La Hei; Torey Lawrence; Kelly Waddell; Mitchell Nash; Andrew Ja Holland
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-06-20

3.  Antimicrobial ceragenins inhibit biofilms and affect mammalian cell viability and migration in vitro.

Authors:  Melissa A Olekson; Tao You; Paul B Savage; Kai P Leung
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.693

4.  Does antibiotic use accelerate or retard cutaneous repair? A systematic review in animal models.

Authors:  Luciana Schulthais Altoé; Raul Santos Alves; Mariáurea Matias Sarandy; Mônica Morais-Santos; Rômulo Dias Novaes; Reggiani Vilela Gonçalves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Silver in Wound Care-Friend or Foe?: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Ibrahim Khansa; Anna R Schoenbrunner; Casey T Kraft; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-12

6.  Silver Sulfadiazine's Effect on Keratin-19 Expression as Stem Cell Marker in Burn Wound Healing.

Authors:  Dewi Sukmawati; Astheria Eryani; Lia Damayanti
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2020-06-05

7.  Effects of wound dressings containing silver on skin and immune cells.

Authors:  Kristina Nešporová; Vojtěch Pavlík; Barbora Šafránková; Hana Vágnerová; Pavel Odráška; Ondřej Žídek; Natálie Císařová; Svitlana Skoroplyas; Lukáš Kubala; Vladimír Velebný
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.