Literature DB >> 28009545

Comparison of helical scan and standard rotation methods in single-crystal X-ray data collection strategies.

Ivan Polsinelli1, Martin Savko1, Cecile Rouanet-Mehouas2, Lidia Ciccone1, Susanna Nencetti3, Elisabetta Orlandini3, Enrico A Stura1, William Shepard1.   

Abstract

X-ray radiation in macromolecular crystallography can chemically alter the biological material and deteriorate the integrity of the crystal lattice with concomitant loss of resolution. Typical alterations include decarboxylation of glutamic and aspartic residues, breaking of disulfide bonds and the reduction of metal centres. Helical scans add a small translation to the crystal in the rotation method, so that for every image the crystal is shifted to expose a fresh part. On beamline PROXIMA 2A at Synchrotron SOLEIL, this procedure has been tested with various parameters in an attempt to understand how to mitigate the effects of radiation damage. Here, the strategies used and the crystallographic metrics for various scenarios are reported. Among these, the loss of bromine from bromophenyl moieties appears to be a useful monitor of radiation damage as the carbon-bromine bond is very sensitive to X-ray irradiation. Two cases are focused on where helical scans are shown to be superior in obtaining meaningful data compared with conventional methods. In one case the initial resolution of the crystal is extended over time, and in the second case the anomalous signal is preserved to provide greater effective multiplicity and easier phasing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROXIMA 2A; bromophenyl ligands; helical scans; micro-focus; radiation damage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28009545     DOI: 10.1107/S1600577516018488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat        ISSN: 0909-0495            Impact factor:   2.616


  6 in total

1.  Structure of the G protein chaperone and guanine nucleotide exchange factor Ric-8A bound to Gαi1.

Authors:  Levi J McClelland; Kaiming Zhang; Tung-Chung Mou; Jake Johnston; Cindee Yates-Hansen; Shanshan Li; Celestine J Thomas; Tzanko I Doukov; Sarah Triest; Alexandre Wohlkonig; Gregory G Tall; Jan Steyaert; Wah Chiu; Stephen R Sprang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Application of sulfur SAD to small crystals with a large asymmetric unit and anomalous substructure.

Authors:  Tung Chung Mou; Baisen Zeng; Tzanko I Doukov; Stephen R Sprang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Multi-position data collection and dynamic beam sizing: recent improvements to the automatic data-collection algorithms on MASSIF-1.

Authors:  Olof Svensson; Maciej Gilski; Didier Nurizzo; Matthew W Bowler
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 7.652

4.  Crystallization and initial X-ray diffraction analysis of the multi-domain Brucella blue light-activated histidine kinase LOV-HK in its illuminated state.

Authors:  Jimena Rinaldi; Ignacio Fernández; Lucía M Poth; William E Shepard; Martin Savko; Fernando A Goldbaum; Sebastián Klinke
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2018-09-26

5.  Getting the Most Out of Your Crystals: Data Collection at the New High-Flux, Microfocus MX Beamlines at NSLS-II.

Authors:  Michelle S Miller; Sweta Maheshwari; Wuxian Shi; Yuan Gao; Nam Chu; Alexei S Soares; Philip A Cole; L Mario Amzel; Martin R Fuchs; Jean Jakoncic; Sandra B Gabelli
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Natural compounds as inhibitors of transthyretin amyloidosis and neuroprotective agents: analysis of structural data for future drug design.

Authors:  Lidia Ciccone; Nicoló Tonali; Susanna Nencetti; Elisabetta Orlandini
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.051

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.