Literature DB >> 28009413

Role of dextran in maintaining adhesive and stiffness properties of prestripped DMEK lenticules.

Mohit Parekh1, Alessandro Ruzza1, Rosa Di Mundo2, Stefano Ferrari1, Giuseppina Recchia2, Hossein Elbadawy1,3, Giuseppe Carbone2, Diego Ponzin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the adhesive and stiffness properties of prestripped Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) lenticules in different preservation conditions (with and without dextran).
METHODS: The study included 3 conditions: (C1) tissues collected from tissue culture media (TCM), stripped and preserved in TCM; (C2) tissues collected from transport media (TM) (TCM supplemented with 6% dextran T-500), stripped and preserved in TM; and (C3) tissues collected from TCM, stripped and preserved in TM. Using a hinge, 9.5-mm stripped DMEK lenticules were restored back on the stroma and preserved for 4 days at room temperature (RT) in different conditions as above. Nine tissues, 3 from each condition, were used to check the adhesive (fibronectin, laminin, and vitronectin) and elastic properties (fibrillin, elastin, and collagen VI) using different antibodies. Six tissues, 2 from each condition, were used to check the stiffness properties after preservation using atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation method.
RESULTS: On the Descemet membrane, fibronectin was strongly expressed in C2 and C3, whereas laminin was intense in C2 postpreservation. Vitronectin was expressed in all the conditions. Elastic proteins were not expressed in either of the conditions apart from collagen VI, which was expressed on the posterior stroma. Atomic force microscopy showed higher stiffness in C3 and an insignificant but lower rigidity in C2 as compared to C1.
CONCLUSIONS: The tissues from C2 showed expression of adherent proteins and lower stiffness. Dextran may be suitable in preservation of DMEK grafts before and after preparation. Less stiff tissues may help reduce manipulations required in the recipient eye during DMEK surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28009413     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcomes after precut DMEK with or without dextran-containing medium compared to standard DMEK: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Karl Boden; Silke Wahl; Andre Trouvain; Andre Schulz; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Cryopreservation of human amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction: a comparison between protocols.

Authors:  Mattia Lamon; Marina Bertolin; Diletta Trojan; Lisa Spagnol; Pietro Maria Donisi; Davide Camposampiero; Diego Ponzin; Stefano Ferrari
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Ahmed Kazaili; Bernhard Steger; Riaz Akhtar; Stefano Ferrari; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.