Yue Liao1, Chih-Ping Chou2, Jimi Huh2, Adam Leventhal2, Genevieve Dunton2. 1. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. yueliao@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Affective response during physical activity may influence motivation to perform future physical activity behavior. However, affective response during physical activity is often assessed under controlled laboratory conditions. The current study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to capture affective responses during free-living physical activity performed by adults, and determined whether these affective responses predict future moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels after 6 and 12 months. METHOD: At baseline, electronic EMA surveys were randomly prompted across 4 days asking about current activities and affective states (e.g., happy, stressed, energetic, tired). Affective response during physical activity was operationalized as the level of positive or negative affect reported when concurrent physical activity (e.g., exercise or sports) was also reported. Data were available for 82 adults. Future levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were measured using accelerometers, worn for seven consecutive days at 6 and 12 months after the baseline assessment. RESULTS: Feeling more energetic during physical activity was associated with performing more minutes of daily MVPA after both 6 and 12 months. Feeling less negative affect during physical activity was associated with engaging in more daily MVPA minutes after 12 months only. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated how EMA can be used to capture affective responses during free-living physical activity. Results found that feelings more energetic and less negative during physical activity were associated with more future physical activity, suggesting that positive emotional benefits may reinforce behavior.
PURPOSE: Affective response during physical activity may influence motivation to perform future physical activity behavior. However, affective response during physical activity is often assessed under controlled laboratory conditions. The current study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to capture affective responses during free-living physical activity performed by adults, and determined whether these affective responses predict future moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels after 6 and 12 months. METHOD: At baseline, electronic EMA surveys were randomly prompted across 4 days asking about current activities and affective states (e.g., happy, stressed, energetic, tired). Affective response during physical activity was operationalized as the level of positive or negative affect reported when concurrent physical activity (e.g., exercise or sports) was also reported. Data were available for 82 adults. Future levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were measured using accelerometers, worn for seven consecutive days at 6 and 12 months after the baseline assessment. RESULTS: Feeling more energetic during physical activity was associated with performing more minutes of daily MVPA after both 6 and 12 months. Feeling less negative affect during physical activity was associated with engaging in more daily MVPA minutes after 12 months only. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated how EMA can be used to capture affective responses during free-living physical activity. Results found that feelings more energetic and less negative during physical activity were associated with more future physical activity, suggesting that positive emotional benefits may reinforce behavior.
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kathryn E Smith; Tyler B Mason; Leah M Schumacher; Christine A Pellegrini; Andrea B Goldschmidt; Jessica L Unick Journal: Psychol Sport Exerc Date: 2021-09-11
Authors: Genevieve F Dunton; Jonas T Kaplan; John Monterosso; Raina D Pang; Tyler B Mason; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Sandrah P Eckel; Adam M Leventhal Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2020-01-16
Authors: Elena D Koch; Heike Tost; Urs Braun; Gabriela Gan; Marco Giurgiu; Iris Reinhard; Alexander Zipf; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer; Markus Reichert Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2018-03-07
Authors: Ana M Abrantes; Sarah L Garnaat; Michael D Stein; Lisa A Uebelacker; David M Williams; Linda L Carpenter; Benjamin D Greenberg; Julie Desaulniers; Daniel Audet Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2022-08-20
Authors: Margot Heijmans; Jeroen G V Habets; Christian Herff; Jos Aarts; An Stevens; Mark L Kuijf; Pieter L Kubben Journal: NPJ Parkinsons Dis Date: 2019-09-30
Authors: Jet J C S Veldhuijzen van Zanten; Sally A M Fenton; Sophia Brady; George S Metsios; Joan L Duda; George D Kitas Journal: Mediterr J Rheumatol Date: 2020-09-21