Literature DB >> 28008336

MICADo - Looking for Mutations in Targeted PacBio Cancer Data: An Alignment-Free Method.

Justine Rudewicz1, Hayssam Soueidan2, Raluca Uricaru2, Hervé Bonnefoi3, Richard Iggo3, Jonas Bergh4, Macha Nikolski2.   

Abstract

Targeted sequencing is commonly used in clinical application of NGS technology since it enables generation of sufficient sequencing depth in the targeted genes of interest and thus ensures the best possible downstream analysis. This notwithstanding, the accurate discovery and annotation of disease causing mutations remains a challenging problem even in such favorable context. The difficulty is particularly salient in the case of third generation sequencing technology, such as PacBio. We present pan class="Chemical">MICADo, a de Bruijn graph based method, implemented in python, that makes possible to distinguish between patient specific mutations and other alterations for targeted sequencing of a cohort of patients. MICADo analyses NGS reads for each sample within the context of the data of the whole cohort in order to capture the differences between specificities of the sample with respect to the cohort. MICADo is particularly suitable for sequencing data from highly heterogeneous samples, especially when it involves high rates of non-uniform sequencing errors. It was validated on PacBio sequencing datasets from several cohorts of patients. The comparison with two widely used available tools, namely VarScan and GATK, shows that MICADo is more accurate, especially when true mutations have frequencies close to backgound noise. The source code is available at http://github.com/cbib/MICADo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; code:python; de Bruijn graphs; patients' cohort; targeted sequencing; third generation sequencing

Year:  2016        PMID: 28008336      PMCID: PMC5143680          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


  35 in total

1.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel C Koboldt; Qunyuan Zhang; David E Larson; Dong Shen; Michael D McLellan; Ling Lin; Christopher A Miller; Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  TP53 status for prediction of sensitivity to taxane versus non-taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00): a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Hervé Bonnefoi; Martine Piccart; Jan Bogaerts; Louis Mauriac; Pierre Fumoleau; Etienne Brain; Thierry Petit; Philippe Rouanet; Jacek Jassem; Emmanuel Blot; Khalil Zaman; Tanja Cufer; Alain Lortholary; Elisabet Lidbrink; Sylvie André; Saskia Litière; Lissandra Dal Lago; Véronique Becette; David A Cameron; Jonas Bergh; Richard Iggo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  TP53 mutations in human cancers: origins, consequences, and clinical use.

Authors:  Magali Olivier; Monica Hollstein; Pierre Hainaut
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Computational approaches to identify functional genetic variants in cancer genomes.

Authors:  Abel Gonzalez-Perez; Ville Mustonen; Boris Reva; Graham R S Ritchie; Pau Creixell; Rachel Karchin; Miguel Vazquez; J Lynn Fink; Karin S Kassahn; John V Pearson; Gary D Bader; Paul C Boutros; Lakshmi Muthuswamy; B F Francis Ouellette; Jüri Reimand; Rune Linding; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Alfonso Valencia; Adam Butler; Serge Dronov; Paul Flicek; Nick B Shannon; Hannah Carter; Li Ding; Chris Sander; Josh M Stuart; Lincoln D Stein; Nuria Lopez-Bigas
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  The origin of the Haitian cholera outbreak strain.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; Jon Sorenson; Jason B Harris; William P Robins; Richelle C Charles; Roger R Jean-Charles; James Bullard; Dale R Webster; Andrew Kasarskis; Paul Peluso; Ellen E Paxinos; Yoshiharu Yamaichi; Stephen B Calderwood; John J Mekalanos; Eric E Schadt; Matthew K Waldor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  The role of replicates for error mitigation in next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Kimberly Robasky; Nathan E Lewis; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  A statistical method for the detection of variants from next-generation resequencing of DNA pools.

Authors:  Vikas Bansal
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Miriam Smith; Paul Coupland; Thomas D Otto; Simon R Harris; Thomas R Connor; Anna Bertoni; Harold P Swerdlow; Yong Gu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  MindTheGap: integrated detection and assembly of short and long insertions.

Authors:  Guillaume Rizk; Anaïs Gouin; Rayan Chikhi; Claire Lemaitre
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  How to apply de Bruijn graphs to genome assembly.

Authors:  Phillip E C Compeau; Pavel A Pevzner; Glenn Tesler
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Alignment-free sequence comparison: benefits, applications, and tools.

Authors:  Andrzej Zielezinski; Susana Vinga; Jonas Almeida; Wojciech M Karlowski
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  SSAW: A new sequence similarity analysis method based on the stationary discrete wavelet transform.

Authors:  Jie Lin; Jing Wei; Donald Adjeroh; Bing-Hua Jiang; Yue Jiang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.