Literature DB >> 28007759

Magnetic resonance perfusion image features uncover an angiogenic subgroup of glioblastoma patients with poor survival and better response to antiangiogenic treatment.

Tiffany T Liu1, Achal S Achrol1, Lex A Mitchell1, Scott A Rodriguez1, Abdullah Feroze1, Michael Iv1, Christine Kim1, Navjot Chaudhary1, Olivier Gevaert1, Josh M Stuart1, Griffith R Harsh1, Steven D Chang1, Daniel L Rubin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In previous clinical trials, antiangiogenic therapies such as bevacizumab did not show efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). This may be a result of the heterogeneity of GBM, which has a variety of imaging-based phenotypes and gene expression patterns. In this study, we sought to identify a phenotypic subtype of GBM patients who have distinct tumor-image features and molecular activities and who may benefit from antiangiogenic therapies.
METHODS: Quantitative image features characterizing subregions of tumors and the whole tumor were extracted from preoperative and pretherapy perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) images of 117 GBM patients in 2 independent cohorts. Unsupervised consensus clustering was performed to identify robust clusters of GBM in each cohort. Cox survival and gene set enrichment analyses were conducted to characterize the clinical significance and molecular pathway activities of the clusters. The differential treatment efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy between the clusters was evaluated.
RESULTS: A subgroup of patients with elevated perfusion features was identified and was significantly associated with poor patient survival after accounting for other clinical covariates (P values <.01; hazard ratios > 3) consistently found in both cohorts. Angiogenesis and hypoxia pathways were enriched in this subgroup of patients, suggesting the potential efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy. Patients of the angiogenic subgroups pooled from both cohorts, who had chemotherapy information available, had significantly longer survival when treated with antiangiogenic therapy (log-rank P=.022).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an angiogenic subtype of GBM patients may benefit from antiangiogenic therapy with improved overall survival.
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiogenesis; antiangiogenic therapy; patient stratification; quantitative perfusion-weighted imaging; radiogenomic analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28007759      PMCID: PMC5570189          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  26 in total

1.  Angiogenesis inhibition for glioblastoma at the edge: beyond AVAGlio and RTOG 0825.

Authors:  Michael Weller; W K Alfred Yung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Regional variation in histopathologic features of tumor specimens from treatment-naive glioblastoma correlates with anatomic and physiologic MR Imaging.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Joanna J Phillips; Rupa Parvataneni; Annette Molinaro; Emma Essock-Burns; Gabriela Bourne; Andrew T Parsa; Manish K Aghi; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Soonmee Cha; Susan M Chang; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Evaluation of different cerebral mass lesions by perfusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Bahattin Hakyemez; Cuneyt Erdogan; Naile Bolca; Nalan Yildirim; Gokhan Gokalp; Mufit Parlak
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Computational Identification of Tumor Anatomic Location Associated with Survival in 2 Large Cohorts of Human Primary Glioblastomas.

Authors:  T T Liu; A S Achrol; L A Mitchell; W A Du; J J Loya; S A Rodriguez; A Feroze; E M Westbroek; K W Yeom; J M Stuart; S D Chang; G R Harsh; D L Rubin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities.

Authors:  Haruka Itakura; Achal S Achrol; Lex A Mitchell; Joshua J Loya; Tiffany Liu; Erick M Westbroek; Abdullah H Feroze; Scott Rodriguez; Sebastian Echegaray; Tej D Azad; Kristen W Yeom; Sandy Napel; Daniel L Rubin; Steven D Chang; Griffith R Harsh; Olivier Gevaert
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Reproducibility of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Zhang; Mark D Pagel; Amanda F Baker; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

1.  Effect of angiotensin system inhibitors on survival in newly diagnosed glioma patients and recurrent glioblastoma patients receiving chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab.

Authors:  Victor A Levin; James Chan; Meenal Datta; Jennie L Yee; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Donghyun Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jae Ho Shin; Jeong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Imaging signatures of glioblastoma molecular characteristics: A radiogenomics review.

Authors:  Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Spyridon Bakas; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Vessel size and perfusion-derived vascular habitat refines prediction of treatment failure to bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastomas: validation in a prospective cohort.

Authors:  Minjae Kim; Ji Eun Park; Shin Kyo Yoon; Nakyoung Kim; Young-Hoon Kim; Jeong Hoon Kim; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Optimization of Acquisition and Analysis Methods for Clinical Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Using a Population-Based Digital Reference Object.

Authors:  N B Semmineh; L C Bell; A M Stokes; L S Hu; J L Boxerman; C C Quarles
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Contrast enhancing pattern on pre-treatment MRI predicts response to anti-angiogenic treatment in recurrent glioblastoma: comparison of bevacizumab and temozolomide treatment.

Authors:  Hye Hyeon Moon; Ji Eun Park; Young-Hoon Kim; Jeong Hoon Kim; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Revealing cancer subtypes with higher-order correlations applied to imaging and omics data.

Authors:  Kiley Graim; Tiffany Ting Liu; Achal S Achrol; Evan O Paull; Yulia Newton; Steven D Chang; Griffith R Harsh; Sergio P Cordero; Daniel L Rubin; Joshua M Stuart
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 8.  The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features.

Authors:  Michal R Tomaszewski; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Imaging-Genomics in Glioblastoma: Combining Molecular and Imaging Signatures.

Authors:  Dongming Liu; Jiu Chen; Xinhua Hu; Kun Yang; Yong Liu; Guanjie Hu; Honglin Ge; Wenbin Zhang; Hongyi Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Value of dynamic contrast perfusion MRI to predict early response to bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results from ACRIN 6686 multicenter trial.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmainda; Melissa A Prah; Helga Marques; Eunhee Kim; Daniel P Barboriak; Jerrold L Boxerman
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 13.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.