Literature DB >> 28007513

[Delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants born before 37 weeks of gestation: A prospective observational study].

O Dicky1, V Ehlinger2, B Guyard-Boileau3, C Assouline4, C Arnaud2, C Casper4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: Many international studies have demonstrated that delayed umbilical cord clamping reduces neonatal morbidity. However, in France, delayed umbilical cord clamping is still not performed in many neonatal units. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of developing a protocol of delayed umbilical cord clamping in the maternity ward of the Toulouse university hospital and to evaluate the impact of this new protocol on neonatal mortality.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study including 123 preterm infants born before 37 weeks of gestation between June 2012 and June 2013 and hospitalized at birth. Delayed cord clamping was performed for at least 30s after birth; otherwise, it was evaluated as early cord clamping. We excluded twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, congenital abnormalities, alloimmunization, and perinatal asphyxia. We analyzed the reasons why delayed umbilical cord clamping was not performed and then neonatal morbidity in our population.
RESULTS: Delayed umbilical cord clamping was performed on 79 infants and 44 infants had early umbilical cord clamping. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. Preterm infants in the delayed cord-clamping group had a higher level of hemoglobin during the first 24h of life (17.9g/dL versus 16.6g/dL, P=0.005), fewer of them required transfusion (14% versus 35%, P=0.03), and fewer presented late-onset sepsis (8% versus 26%, P=0.02) or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (9% versus 26%, P=0.03). There was no statistically significant increase of hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Implanting a new protocol of delayed umbilical cord clamping in our maternity ward proved to be possible without difficulty. The advantages of delayed umbilical cord clamping were observed in this prospective study. Today, delayed cord clamping has become a common practice in our maternity unit.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28007513     DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2016.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr        ISSN: 0929-693X            Impact factor:   1.180


  4 in total

1.  Implementation of Delayed Cord Clamping in public health facilities: a case study from India.

Authors:  Archana Chowdhury; Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi; Ved Prakash; Nilam Patel; Kunal Pawar; Vinay Kumar Koparde; Anupriya Shukla; Sangeeta Karmakar; Smitha Chekanath Parambath; Sarah Rowe; Homero Martinez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  The effects of umblical cord clamping time on lymphocyte subgroups in term and late preterm infants.

Authors:  Nilgün Bahar; Mehmet Satar; Mustafa Yılmaz; Selim Büyükkurt; Ferda Özlü; Hacer Yapıcıoğlu Yıldızdaş; Akgün Yaman
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2018-12-01

Review 3.  Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yiyu Qian; Xinxin Ying; Peixin Wang; Zhe Lu; Ying Hua
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  MRI Imaging Omics and Risk Factors Analysis of PWMD in Premature Infants Based on Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Yuewen Hao; Huan Sun; Chao Chen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.009

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.