Literature DB >> 28007409

Sensitivity of Cytology Specimens From Bronchial Aspirate or Washing During Bronchoscopy in the Diagnosis of Lung Malignancies: An Update.

Philippe Girard1, Raffaele Caliandro2, Agathe Seguin-Givelet3, Stéphane Lenoir4, Dominique Gossot2, Pierre Validire5, Jean-Baptiste Stern2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine collection of cytology specimens from bronchial aspirate or washing is thought to increase the sensitivity of bronchoscopy for diagnosing malignant lung lesions. However, the added value of this practice has not been reappraised in a context of changing epidemiology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective monocenter study, all cytology specimens from bronchial aspirate or washing collected between May 2011 and December 2014 and the corresponding patients' files were reviewed. The final diagnosis of malignancy was based on all available pathologic information.
RESULTS: Bronchoscopy was performed in 2750 patients, and bronchial cytology specimens were collected during 667 procedures, including 474 aspirate or washing cytology specimens collected during conventional (n = 366) or ultrasound-guided (EBUS) (n = 108) bronchoscopy in 455 patients with malignant lung lesion(s). The predominant histologic types were lung adenocarcinoma (43.9%) and squamous cell carcinoma (25.2%), and 271 tumors (59.6%) were endoscopically visible. At least 1 endoscopic sample (bronchial cytology and/or biopsies and/or endobronchial ultrasound-guided samples) was positive for malignancy during 329 (69.4%) of the 474 endoscopies, including 79 samples obtained in nonvisible lesions. Only 67 bronchial cytology specimens proved positive (sensitivity, 14.7%; 95% confidence interval, 11.8%-18.3%), and only 1 specimen (0.2%) produced a diagnosis not made by other samples during the same procedure.
CONCLUSION: In contrast with older studies, the added value of collecting cytology specimens from bronchial aspirate or washing during bronchoscopy in this series proved negligible, reflecting mainly the increasing prevalence of adenocarcinomas. Abandoning this technique could be considered in centers with similar expertise and patient populations.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic yield; Futility of diagnostic test; Lung cancer; Lung metastases; Pathology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28007409     DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.785


  2 in total

1.  PCDHGA12 methylation biomarker in bronchial washing specimens as an adjunctive diagnostic tool to bronchoscopy in lung cancer.

Authors:  In Beom Jeong; Yoo Sang Yoon; Shin Young Park; Eun Jung Cha; Moon Jun Na; Sun Jung Kwon; Ji Hye Kim; Tae Jeong Oh; Sungwhan An; Chang Ryul Park; Young Jin Kim; Dong Ho Park; Ji Woong Son
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Multivariate Analysis Of The Diagnostic Yield Of Conventional Bronchoscopy In Peripheral Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Cuiyun Li; Hui Wang; Ping Han; Yunqiang Nie
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.989

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.