Literature DB >> 28006729

Can observing a Necker cube make you more insightful?

Ruben E Laukkonen1, Jason M Tangen2.   

Abstract

It is a compelling idea that an image as simple as a Necker cube, or a duck-rabbit illusion, can reveal something about a person's creativity. Surprisingly, there are now multiple examples showing that people who are better at discovering 'hidden' images in a picture, are also better at solving some creative problems. Although this idea goes back at least a century, little is known about how these two tasks-that seem so different on the surface-are related to each other. At least some forms of creativity (and indeed scientific discoveries) may require that we change our perspectives in order to discover a novel solution to a problem. It's possible that such problems involve a similar cognitive process, and perhaps the same cognitive capacities, as switching perspectives in an ambiguous image. We begin by replicating previous work, and also show metacognitive similarities between the sudden appearance of hidden images in consciousness, and the sudden appearance of solutions to verbal insight problems. We then show that simply observing a Necker cube can improve subsequent creative problem-solving and lead to more self-reported insights. We speculate that these results may in part be explained by Conflict Monitoring Theory.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bistable images; Conflict monitoring; Insight; Problem-solving

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28006729     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  5 in total

1.  How to Detect Insight Moments in Problem Solving Experiments.

Authors:  Ruben E Laukkonen; Jason M Tangen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 2.  Bistable perception: neural bases and usefulness in psychological research.

Authors:  Guillermo Andrés Rodríguez-Martínez; Henry Castillo-Parra
Journal:  Int J Psychol Res (Medellin)       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec

3.  Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true.

Authors:  Ruben E Laukkonen; Benjamin T Kaveladze; John Protzko; Jason M Tangen; William von Hippel; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evaluating the predictive validity of four divergent thinking tasks for the originality of design product ideation.

Authors:  Abbey K Erwin; Khue Tran; Wilma Koutstaal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Oculometric signature of switch into awareness? Pupil size predicts sudden insight whereas microsaccades predict problem-solving via analysis.

Authors:  Carola Salvi; Claudio Simoncini; Jordan Grafman; Mark Beeman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 6.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.