OBJECTIVES: Although many service members successfully cope with exposure to stress and traumatic experiences, others have symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety; contextual factors may account for the variability in outcomes from these experiences. This work sought to understand mechanisms through which social support influences the mental health of service members and whether dyadic functioning mediates this relationship. METHODS: We collected cross-sectional data as part of a larger study conducted in 2013; 321 military personnel who had at least 1 deployment were included in these analyses. Surveys were completed online; we collected data on demographic characteristics, social support, mental health measures (depression, PTSD, and anxiety), and dyadic functioning. We performed process modeling through mediation analysis. RESULTS: The direct effects of social support on the mental health of military personnel were limited; however, across all types of support networks, greater social support was significantly associated with better dyadic functioning. Dyadic functioning mediated the relationships between social support and depression/PTSD only when social support came from nonmilitary friends or family; dyadic functioning mediated social support and anxiety only when support came from family. We found no indirect effects of support from military peers or military leaders. CONCLUSION: Findings here highlight the need to continue to explore ways in which social support, particularly from family and nonmilitary-connected peers, can bolster healthy intimate partner relationships and, in turn, improve the well-being of military service members who are deployed.
OBJECTIVES: Although many service members successfully cope with exposure to stress and traumatic experiences, others have symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety; contextual factors may account for the variability in outcomes from these experiences. This work sought to understand mechanisms through which social support influences the mental health of service members and whether dyadic functioning mediates this relationship. METHODS: We collected cross-sectional data as part of a larger study conducted in 2013; 321 military personnel who had at least 1 deployment were included in these analyses. Surveys were completed online; we collected data on demographic characteristics, social support, mental health measures (depression, PTSD, and anxiety), and dyadic functioning. We performed process modeling through mediation analysis. RESULTS: The direct effects of social support on the mental health of military personnel were limited; however, across all types of support networks, greater social support was significantly associated with better dyadic functioning. Dyadic functioning mediated the relationships between social support and depression/PTSD only when social support came from nonmilitary friends or family; dyadic functioning mediated social support and anxiety only when support came from family. We found no indirect effects of support from military peers or military leaders. CONCLUSION: Findings here highlight the need to continue to explore ways in which social support, particularly from family and nonmilitary-connected peers, can bolster healthy intimate partner relationships and, in turn, improve the well-being of military service members who are deployed.
Entities:
Keywords:
PTSD; anxiety; depression; dyadic functioning; reintegration; social support
Authors: Charles W Hoge; Carl A Castro; Stephen C Messer; Dennis McGurk; Dave I Cotting; Robert L Koffman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Charles Nelson; Kate St Cyr; Bradley Corbett; Elisa Hurley; Shannon Gifford; Jon D Elhai; J Donald Richardson Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Shira Maguen; David D Luxton; Nancy A Skopp; Gregory A Gahm; Mark A Reger; Thomas J Metzler; Charles R Marmar Journal: J Anxiety Disord Date: 2011-01-22
Authors: George A Bonanno; Anthony D Mancini; Jaime L Horton; Teresa M Powell; Cynthia A Leardmann; Edward J Boyko; Timothy S Wells; Tomoko I Hooper; Gary D Gackstetter; Tyler C Smith Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Susan V Eisen; Mark R Schultz; Dawne Vogt; Mark E Glickman; A Rani Elwy; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Princess E Osei-Bonsu; James Martin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Bethany Easterbrook; Andrea Brown; Heather Millman; Sherry Van Blyderveen; Ruth Lanius; Alex Heber; Margaret McKinnon; Charlene O'Connor Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 2.725