S Jarius1, P Eichhorn2, D Franciotta3, H F Petereit4, G Akman-Demir5, M Wick2, B Wildemann6. 1. Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, Otto Meyerhof Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 350, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. sven.jarius@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany. 3. IRCCS, National Neurological Institute C. Mondino, Pavia, Italy. 4. Praxis rechts vom Rhein, Cologne, Germany. 5. Department of Neurology, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey. 6. Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, Otto Meyerhof Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 350, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has long been known that the majority of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) display an intrathecal, polyspecific humoral immune response to a broad panel of neurotropic viruses. This response has measles virus, rubella virus and varicella zoster virus as its most frequent constituents and is thus referred to as the MRZ reaction (MRZR). OBJECTIVE: Re-evaluation of the specificity of MRZR as a marker of MS. METHODS: Structured review of the existing English-, German- and Spanish-language literature on MRZR testing, with evaluation of MRZR in a cohort of 43 unselected patients with MS and other neurological diseases as a proof of principle. RESULTS: A positive MRZ reaction, defined as a positive intrathecal response to at least two of the three viral agents, was found in 78% of MS patients but only in 3% of the controls (p < 0.00001), corresponding to specificity of 97%. Median antibody index values were significantly lower in non-MS patients (measles, p < 0.0001; rubella, p < 0.006; varicella zoster, p < 0.02). The 30 identified original studies on MRZR reported results from 1478 individual MRZR tests. A positive MRZR was reported for 458/724 (63.3%) tests in patients with MS but only for 19/754 (2.5%) tests in control patients (p < 0.000001), corresponding to cumulative specificity of 97.5% (CI 95% 96-98.4), cumulative sensitivity of 63.3% (CI 95% 59.6-66.8) (or 67.4% [CI 95% 63.5-71.1] in the adult MS subgroup), a positive likelihood ratio of 25.1 (CI 95% 16-39.3) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.38 (CI 95% 0.34-0.41). Of particular note, MRZR was absent in 52/53 (98.1%) patients with neuromyelitis optica or MOG-IgG-positive encephalomyelitis, two important differential diagnoses of MS. CONCLUSION: MRZR is the most specific laboratory marker of MS reported to date. If present, MRZR substantially increases the likelihood of the diagnosis of MS. Prospective and systematic studies on the diagnostic and prognostic impact of MRZR testing are highly warranted.
BACKGROUND: It has long been known that the majority of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) display an intrathecal, polyspecific humoral immune response to a broad panel of neurotropic viruses. This response has measles virus, rubella virus and varicella zoster virus as its most frequent constituents and is thus referred to as the MRZ reaction (MRZR). OBJECTIVE: Re-evaluation of the specificity of MRZR as a marker of MS. METHODS: Structured review of the existing English-, German- and Spanish-language literature on MRZR testing, with evaluation of MRZR in a cohort of 43 unselected patients with MS and other neurological diseases as a proof of principle. RESULTS: A positive MRZ reaction, defined as a positive intrathecal response to at least two of the three viral agents, was found in 78% of MS patients but only in 3% of the controls (p < 0.00001), corresponding to specificity of 97%. Median antibody index values were significantly lower in non-MS patients (measles, p < 0.0001; rubella, p < 0.006; varicella zoster, p < 0.02). The 30 identified original studies on MRZR reported results from 1478 individual MRZR tests. A positive MRZR was reported for 458/724 (63.3%) tests in patients with MS but only for 19/754 (2.5%) tests in control patients (p < 0.000001), corresponding to cumulative specificity of 97.5% (CI 95% 96-98.4), cumulative sensitivity of 63.3% (CI 95% 59.6-66.8) (or 67.4% [CI 95% 63.5-71.1] in the adult MS subgroup), a positive likelihood ratio of 25.1 (CI 95% 16-39.3) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.38 (CI 95% 0.34-0.41). Of particular note, MRZR was absent in 52/53 (98.1%) patients with neuromyelitis optica or MOG-IgG-positive encephalomyelitis, two important differential diagnoses of MS. CONCLUSION: MRZR is the most specific laboratory marker of MS reported to date. If present, MRZR substantially increases the likelihood of the diagnosis of MS. Prospective and systematic studies on the diagnostic and prognostic impact of MRZR testing are highly warranted.
Authors: Sven Jarius; Klemens Ruprecht; Ingo Kleiter; Nadja Borisow; Nasrin Asgari; Kalliopi Pitarokoili; Florence Pache; Oliver Stich; Lena-Alexandra Beume; Martin W Hümmert; Marius Ringelstein; Corinna Trebst; Alexander Winkelmann; Alexander Schwarz; Mathias Buttmann; Hanna Zimmermann; Joseph Kuchling; Diego Franciotta; Marco Capobianco; Eberhard Siebert; Carsten Lukas; Mirjam Korporal-Kuhnke; Jürgen Haas; Kai Fechner; Alexander U Brandt; Kathrin Schanda; Orhan Aktas; Friedemann Paul; Markus Reindl; Brigitte Wildemann Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: M Andersson; J Alvarez-Cermeño; G Bernardi; I Cogato; P Fredman; J Frederiksen; S Fredrikson; P Gallo; L M Grimaldi; M Grønning Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Dean M Wingerchuk; Brenda Banwell; Jeffrey L Bennett; Philippe Cabre; William Carroll; Tanuja Chitnis; Jérôme de Seze; Kazuo Fujihara; Benjamin Greenberg; Anu Jacob; Sven Jarius; Marco Lana-Peixoto; Michael Levy; Jack H Simon; Silvia Tenembaum; Anthony L Traboulsee; Patrick Waters; Kay E Wellik; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Johannes Brettschneider; Hayrettin Tumani; Ulrike Kiechle; Rainer Muche; Gayle Richards; Vera Lehmensiek; Albert C Ludolph; Markus Otto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Isabel Brecht; Benedikt Weissbrich; Julia Braun; Klaus Viktor Toyka; Andreas Weishaupt; Mathias Buttmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: S Jarius; F Paul; O Aktas; N Asgari; R C Dale; J de Seze; D Franciotta; K Fujihara; A Jacob; H J Kim; I Kleiter; T Kümpfel; M Levy; J Palace; K Ruprecht; A Saiz; C Trebst; B G Weinshenker; B Wildemann Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Katelyn D Miller; Christine M Matullo; Katelynn A Milora; Riley M Williams; Kevin J O'Regan; Glenn F Rall Journal: J Virol Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Martin Stangel; Klemens Ruprecht; Brigitte Wildemann; Sven Jarius; Florence Pache; Peter Körtvelyessy; Ilijas Jelčić; Mark Stettner; Diego Franciotta; Emanuela Keller; Bernhard Neumann; Marius Ringelstein; Makbule Senel; Axel Regeniter; Rea Kalantzis; Jan F Willms; Achim Berthele; Markus Busch; Marco Capobianco; Amanda Eisele; Ina Reichen; Rick Dersch; Sebastian Rauer; Katharina Sandner; Ilya Ayzenberg; Catharina C Gross; Harald Hegen; Michael Khalil; Ingo Kleiter; Thorsten Lenhard; Jürgen Haas; Orhan Aktas; Klemens Angstwurm; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Jan Lewerenz; Hayrettin Tumani; Friedemann Paul Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 8.322