| Literature DB >> 28004829 |
Renwu Zhou1,2, Rusen Zhou3, Xianhui Zhang1,4, Jiangwei Li1, Xingquan Wang2,5, Qiang Chen1, Size Yang1, Zhong Chen1, Kateryna Bazaka2,6, Kostya Ken Ostrikov2,6.
Abstract
Atmospheric-pressure plasma and TiO2 photocatalysis have been widely investigated separately for the management and reduction of microorganisms in aqueous solutions. In this paper, the two methods were combined in order to achieve a more profound understanding of their interactions in disinfection of water contaminated by Escherichia coli. Under water discharges carried out by microplasma jet arrays can result in a rapid inactivation of E. coli cells. The inactivation efficiency is largely dependent on the feed gases used, the plasma treatment time, and the discharge power. Compared to atmospheric-pressure N2, He and air microplasma arrays, O2 microplasma had the highest activity against E. coli cells in aqueous solution, and showed >99.9% bacterial inactivation efficiency within 4 min. Addition of TiO2 photocatalytic film to the plasma discharge reactor significantly enhanced the inactivation efficiency of the O2 microplasma system, decreasing the time required to achieve 99.9% killing of E. coli cells to 1 min. This may be attributed to the enhancement of ROS generation due to high catalytic activity and stability of the TiO2 photocatalyst in the combined plasma-TiO2 systems. Present work demonstrated the synergistic effect of the two agents, which can be correlated in order to maximize treatment efficiency.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28004829 PMCID: PMC5177875 DOI: 10.1038/srep39552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The mechanism of TiO2 photocatalytic activity for microorganism inactivation, water treatment and air purification.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the well-aligned air microplasma jet array operating at atmospheric pressure.
Top view of the microplasma device (a) and cross-sectional view of single-discharge system without TiO2 (SD) (b), SD system with a circular TiO2 film (CTD) (c), and SD system with a plate-like TiO2 film (PTD) (d).
Figure 3Viability of E. coli cells treated using microplasma arrays fed with (a) N2, (b) He, (c) air, and (d) O2 gases as a function of treatment time. The plasma treatments have been performed at VP = 4.5 kV. (e) The comparison between empirical ln(C/C) and theoretical kinetic rate values (from Eq. 1).
Figure 4The comparison between the experimentally-obtained ln(C/C) and theoretically-predicted kinetic rate values (using Eq. 1) for different plasma discharge systems as a function of discharge energy (VP).
The kinetic rate at different V P values and under different O2 plasma discharge systems.
| Conditions | 3.0 kV | 4.5 kV | 6.0 kV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD | CTD | PTD | SD | CTD | PTD | SD | CTD | PTD | |
| Kinetic rate (s−1) | 0.031 | 0.046 | 0.037 | 0.076 | 0.110 | 0.089 | 0.150 | 0.300 | 0.200 |
| R2 | 0.998 | 0.997 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 1 | 1 | — |
Changes of ROS concentrations in aqueous solution with N2, He, air and O2 plasma treatments.
| Conditions | N2 microplasma | He microplasma | air microplasma | O2 microplasma | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 min | 3 min | 5 min | 1 min | 3 min | 5 min | 1 min | 3 min | 5 min | 1 min | 3 min | 5 min | |
| H2O2 (mg/L) | 0.352 | 0.863 | 1.463 | 0.782 | 1.349 | 2.036 | 1.325 | 3.892 | 5.644 | 3.947 | 8.764 | 14.013 |
| O3 (mg/L) | 0.022 | 0.036 | 0.047 | 0.033 | 0.057 | 0.080 | 0.536 | 0.612 | 0.700 | 0.620 | 0.678 | 0.758 |
| ·OH (mg/L) | 0.076 | 0.119 | 0.247 | 0.092 | 0.163 | 0.363 | 0.903 | 2.093 | 3.683 | 1.445 | 2.517 | 3.998 |
Changes of ROS concentrations in O2 plasma-treated solution under different plasma discharge systems.
| Conditions | 3.0 kV | 4.5 kV | 6.0 kV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD | CTD | PTD | SD | CTD | PTD | SD | CTD | PTD | |
| H2O2 (mg/L) | 1.126 | 5.865 | 3.652 | 14.013 | 16.304 | 15.392 | 15.494 | 17.985 | 16.909 |
| O3 (mg/L) | 0.226 | 0. 560 | 0. 344 | 0.758 | 0.845 | 0.786 | 0.837 | 0.989 | 0.865 |
| ·OH (mg/L) | 0.698 | 1.291 | 1.019 | 3.998 | 6.284 | 5.524 | 5.570 | 8.098 | 6.909 |
Figure 5Comparison of the E. coli inactivation performance of CTD and PTD O2 plasma systems containing original or used TiO2 films.
All O2 plasma treatments were performed at a V of 4.5 kV with different treatment time.
Figure 6The XRD patterns of original (a) TiO2 films and those re-used for six times in CTD (b) and PTD (c) O2 plasma systems.
Figure 7ROS concentrations in solutions treated with SD, PTD and CTD O2 plasma systems under different plasma discharge power of 12 W, 20 W and 50 W.
Figure 8Reaction mechanism of plasma discharge combined with TiO2 films.