| Literature DB >> 28004791 |
Wenyao Wang1, Haixia Guan2, Wei Fang3, Kuo Zhang1, A Martin Gerdes4, Giorgio Iervasi5, Yi-Da Tang1.
Abstract
Thyroid dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis in heart failure, but theories of mechanisms are mainly based on animal experiments, not on human level. We aimed to explore the relation between thyroid function and myocardial injuries in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). Myocardial fibrosis was detected by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI, and myocardial perfusion/metabolism was evaluated by 99mTc-MIBI SPECT /18F-FDG PET imaging. Across the quartiles of FT3, decreased percentage of segments with LGE and perfusion/metabolism abnormalities were found. As for FT4 and TSH levels, no significant distribution trend of myocardial injuries could be detected. In logistic analysis, FT3 was independently associated with the presence of LGE (OR: 0.140, 95% CI: 0.035-0.567), perfusion abnormalities (OR: 0.172, 95% CI: 0.040-0.738) and metabolism abnormalities (OR: 0.281, 95% CI: 0.081-0.971). After a median follow-up of 46 months, LGE-positive and FT3 < 2.77 pg/mL was identified as the strongest predictor of cardiac events (HR: 8.623, 95% CI: 3.626-16.438). Low FT3 level is associated with myocardial fibrosis and perfusion/metabolism abnormalities in patients with IDCM. The combination of FT3 level and LGE provides useful information for assessing the prognosis of IDCM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28004791 PMCID: PMC5177909 DOI: 10.1038/srep39811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Representative examples of LGE-positive and perfusion/metabolism abnormality images.
The typical LGE pattern in DCM is mid-wall enhancement in the interventricular septum (A,B). A diffuse pattern was observed in 5 out of 31 LGE-positive patients (C,D). Severely reduced uptake of 99mTc-MIBI in apex, anterior and inferior wall (E) while 18F-FDG PET imaging showed normal FDG uptake (F) in corresponding areas, which was defined as a perfusion/metabolism mismatch pattern. Reduced uptake in anterior, mildly to moderately reduced uptake in lateral and inferior wall in both 99mTc-MIBI SPECT (G) and 18F-FDG PET imaging (H), which was defined as a severe perfusion/metabolism match pattern in anterior and mild-to-moderate match pattern in lateral and inferior wall.
Baseline Characteristics of Study Population by Quartiles of FT3 Level.
| Quartiles of FT3 level (pg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <2.53n = 20 | 2.53–2.76n = 16 | 2.77–3.19n = 18 | >3.19n = 17 | ||
| Age (year) | 57 (46–63) | 48 (36–60) | 56 (49–66) | 54 (49–59) | 0.112 |
| Female (n, %) | 10 (50.0%) | 6 (37.5%) | 5 (27.8%) | 3 (17.6%) | 0.017 |
| Smoking, (n, %) | 4 (20.0%) | 6 (37.5%) | 7 (38.9%) | 9 (52.9%) | 0.024 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.2 (3.79) | 24.91 (5.89) | 24.63 (1.7) | 25.87 (2.92) | 0.635 |
| Blood pressure | |||||
| Systolic (mmHg) | 112 (18) | 107 (18) | 119 (19) | 117 (14) | 0.231 |
| Diastolic (mmHg) | 70 (9) | 71 (11) | 71 (11) | 76 (11) | 0.268 |
| NYHA III–IV class, (n, %) | 18 (90.0%) | 11 (68.7% | 13 (72.2%) | 13 (76.5%) | 0.411 |
| Comorbidities (n, %) | |||||
| Atrial fibrillation | 4 (20.0%) | 4 (25.0%) | 2 (11.1%) | 2 (11.8%) | 0.026 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 5 (25.0%) | 2 (12.5%) | 3 (16.7%) | 1 (5.9%) | 0.439 |
| Dyslipidemia | 7 (35.0%) | 6 (37.5%) | 5 (27.8%) | 6 (35.3%) | 0.924 |
| Anemia | 3 (15.0%) | 4 (25.0%) | 2 (11.1%) | 1 (5.9%) | 0.473 |
| Renal dysfunction | 4 (20.0%) | 5 (31.3%) | 4 (22.2%) | 2 (11.8%) | 0.592 |
| Medications, (n, %) | |||||
| ACEi/ARB | 11 (55.0%) | 10 (62.5%) | 15 (83.3%) | 12 (70.6%) | 0.291 |
| Beta blocker | 18 (90.0%) | 13 (81.3%) | 18 (100.0%) | 12 (70.6%) | 0.078 |
| Aldosterone antagonists | 13 (65.0%) | 8 (50.0%) | 11 (61.1%) | 6 (35.3%) | 0.498 |
| Diuretics | 19 (95.0%) | 15 (93.8%) | 17 (94.4%) | 14 (82.4%) | 0.482 |
| Cardiac MRI measurements | |||||
| LVEF (%) | 23 (6) | 24 (8) | 28 (9) | 28 (7) | 0.009 |
| LVEDV index (mL/m2) | 170.5 (72.1) | 162.2 (70.5) | 145.3 (61.7) | 132.5 (50.6) | 0.032 |
| LVESV index (mL/m2) | 137.1 (56.2) | 120.6 (60.4) | 129.3 (49.1) | 105.7 (53.5) | 0.073 |
| LV mass (g) | 142 (7) | 146 (9) | 149 (7) | 147 (8) | 0.154 |
| Presence of LGE | 13 (65.0%) | 10 (62.5%) | 7 (38.8%) | 3 (17.6%) | 0.015 |
| Presence of perfusion abnormality | 14 (70.0%) | 9 (56.2%) | 13 (72.2%) | 6 (35.3%) | 0.098 |
| Presence of metabolism abnormality | 10 (50.0%) | 7 (43.8%) | 3 (16.7%) | 3 (17.6%) | 0.058 |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 1.55 (0.89–3.5) | 2.32 (1.44–2.93) | 2.19 (1.52–3.1) | 0.86 (0.6–1.43) | 0.444 |
| FT4 (ng/dlL) | 1.25 (1.05–1.39) | 1.22 (1.13–1.27) | 1.21 (1.10–1.43) | 1.27 (1.09–1.43) | 0.291 |
| FT3 (pg/mL) | 2.29 (1.92–2.46) | 2.65 (2.60–2.70) | 3.01 (2.88–3.13) | 3.38 (3.24–3.61) | <0.001 |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index; NYHA, New York Heart Association; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; LV, left ventricle; EF, ejection fraction; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; FT4, free thyroxin; FT3, free triiodothyronine. The data are presented as n (%), median (first quartile, third quartile) or mean (SD).
Segments Analysis of LGE and Myocardial Perfusion/Metabolism Patterns by Quartiles of FT3 level.
| Quartiles of FT3 level (pg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <2.53 (No. of segments: 340) | 2.53–2.76 (No. of segments: 272) | 2.77–3.19 (No. of segments: 306) | >3.19 (No. of segments: 289) | ||
| Cardiac MRI measurements (No. of segments, %) | |||||
| Total segments with LGE | 80 (23.53%) | 45 (16.54%) | 16 (5.22%) | 9 (3.11%) | <0.001 |
| Mid-wall | 55 (16.18%) | 22 (8.09%) | 14 (4.58%) | 8 (2.77%) | <0.001 |
| Trans-murual | 25 (7.35%) | 23 (8.46%) | 2 (0.65%) | 1 (0.35%) | <0.001 |
| 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/18F-FDG PET imaging (No. of segments, %) | |||||
| Segments with perfusion abnormalities | 71 (20.88%) | 45 (16.54%) | 43 (14.05%) | 28 (9.69%) | <0.001 |
| Segments with metabolism abnormalities | 30 (8.82%) | 20 (7.35%) | 5 (1.63%) | 14 (4.84%) | 0.022 |
| Perfusion/metabolism match pattern | |||||
| Normal | 269 (79.12%) | 227 (83.46%) | 264 (86.27%) | 261 (90.31%) | <0.001 |
| Mismatch | 41 (12.06%) | 25 (9.19%) | 38 (12.42%) | 14 (4.84%) | 0.016 |
| Mild-moderate match | 22 (6.47%) | 12 (4.41%) | 2 (0.65%) | 7 (2.42%) | 0.005 |
| Severe match | 8 (2.35%) | 8 (2.94%) | 3 (0.98%) | 7 (2.42%) | 0.635 |
*P value for trend estimated by using Cochran-Armitage trend test between FT3 quartiles and percentage of LGE.
Predictors of LGE and Perfusion/Metabolism Abnormalities by Logistic Regression.
| Presence of LGE | Presence of perfusion abnormalities | Presence of metabolism abnormalities | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||||
| Univariate analysis | |||||||||
| FT3 | 0.180 | 0.059–0.550 | 0.003 | 0.380 | 0.146–0.991 | 0.048 | 0.338 | 0.126–0.910 | 0.032 |
| FT4 | 0.373 | 0.050–2.759 | 0.334 | 0.432 | 0.068–2.729 | 0.372 | 0.644 | 0.088–4.709 | 0.665 |
| Log-TSH | 0.982 | 0.930–1.038 | 0.524 | 1.067 | 0.67–1.699 | 0.785 | 1.073 | 0.661–1.743 | 0.774 |
| Age | 0.972 | 0.934–1.012 | 0.165 | 0.963 | 0.922–1.005 | 0.085 | 0.981 | 0.942–1.022 | 0.353 |
| Male | 0.808 | 0.302–2.164 | 0.671 | 1.053 | 0.388–2.858 | 0.920 | 0.707 | 0.251–1.993 | 0.512 |
| LVEF | 0.989 | 0.950–1.030 | 0.609 | 0.973 | 0.932–1.014 | 0.194 | 0.983 | 0.941–1.028 | 0.451 |
| BMI | 0.906 | 0.787–1.044 | 0.174 | 0.975 | 0.858–1.107 | 0.693 | 0.866 | 0.737–1.019 | 0.083 |
| Diabetes | 2.288 | 0.605–8.656 | 0.223 | 8.750 | 1.053–12.699 | 0.045 | 0.413 | 0.082–2.088 | 0.285 |
| Smoking | 0.767 | 0.290–2.029 | 0.593 | 1.169 | 0.436–3.137 | 0.756 | 0.889 | 0.315–2.510 | 0.824 |
| Hypertension | 0.481 | 0.175–1.321 | 0.156 | 0.500 | 0.184–1.361 | 0.175 | 0.242 | 0.071–0.828 | 0.024 |
| Anemia | 0.365 | 0.036–3.685 | 0.393 | 0.211 | 0.021–2.142 | 0.188 | 0.682 | 0.067–6.937 | 0.746 |
| Renal dysfunction | 0.500 | 0.151–1.651 | 0.255 | 0.257 | 0.077–0.859 | 0.027 | 0.450 | 0.113–1.785 | 0.256 |
| Dyslipidemia | 0.779 | 0.288–2.111 | 0.624 | 0.693 | 0.254–1.886 | 0.473 | 0.409 | 0.130–1.292 | 0.128 |
| Multivariate analysis* | |||||||||
| FT3 | 0.140 | 0.035–0.567 | 0.006 | 0.172 | 0.040–0.738 | 0.018 | 0.281 | 0.081–0.971 | 0.045 |
| Age | 0.914 | 0.854–0.978 | 0.009 | 0.946 | 0.891–1.004 | 0.070 | |||
| Diabetes | 5.925 | 1.005–14.944 | 0.049 | 9.504 | 0.922–17.957 | 0.059 | |||
| Renal dysfunction | 0.101 | 0.016–0.648 | 0.016 | ||||||
| Hypertension | 0.455 | 0.11–1.876 | 0.276 | ||||||
*Significant predictors selected by univariate analysis were just put in. Stepwise strategy was used for other factors, in which predictors with P value < 0.1 were kept.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curves comparing the probability of all-cause death.
The LGE-positive+ FT3 < 2.77 pg/mL group had the worst prognosis. Importantly, survival in the LGE-negative+ FT3 < 2.77 pg/mL group was intermediate, but comparable with that in the LGE-positive+ FT3 ≥ 2.77 pg/mL group (p = 0.637).
Multivariate Cox Survival Analysis Based on FT3 Level and Presence of LGE.
| Model 1* | Model 2† | Model 3‡ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
| Age (per 5 years) | 1.073 | 1.056–1.983 | 0.040 | 1.094 | 1.059–1.351 | 0.043 | 1.090 | 1.012–1.341 | 0.035 |
| Gender (male) | 1.629 | 0.968–2.217 | 0.091 | 1.492 | 0.453–2.381 | 0.136 | |||
| LVEF (per 5%) | 0.754 | 0.613–0.992 | 0.026 | 0.781 | 0.539–0.974 | 0.035 | 0.746 | 0.609–0.935 | 0.029 |
| Anemia | 3.712 | 1.203–10.020 | 0.049 | 3.519 | 1.197–8.356 | 0.022 | |||
| Renal Dysfunction | 2.642 | 1.136–4.184 | 0.039 | 2.216 | 0.972–3.923 | 0.065 | |||
| FT3 < 2.77 | 2.181 | 1.627–7.589 | 0.020 | ||||||
| Presence of LGE | 5.489 | 1.451–10.76 | 0.012 | ||||||
| LGE-negtive+ FT3 < 2.77 | 2.127 | 0.830–5.107 | 0.145 | ||||||
| LGE-positive+ FT3 ≥ 2.77 | 5.490 | 2.645–9.823 | 0.011 | 4.966 | 1.851–8.658 | 0.007 | |||
| LGE-positive+ FT3 < 2.77 | 7.908 | 2.433–14.908 | 0.002 | 8.623 | 3.626–16.438 | 0.001 | |||
*Multivariate Cox model selected by a stepwise method with factors that were significant in the univariate analysis and established risk factors for prognosis (age, gender, NYHA classification).
†Model with the combination of LGE and FT3 < 2.77, adjusted for predictors selected by Model 1.
‡Best predictive model in which predictors with P value < 0.1 were kept, adjusted for significant predictors selected by a stepwise Cox regression analysis based on Models 1 and 2.