| Literature DB >> 28004748 |
A Muthurasu1,2, V Ganesh1,2.
Abstract
Biomolecules assisted preparation of fluorescent gold nanoparticles (FL-Au NPs) has been reported in this work using glucose oxidase enzyme as both reducing and stabilizing agent and demonstrated their application through multimodal sensing strategy for selective detection of cysteine (Cys). Three different methods namely fluorescence turn OFF-ON strategy, naked eye detection and electrochemical methods are used for Cys detection by employing FL-Au NPs as a common probe. In case of fluorescence turn-OFF method a strong interaction between Au NPs and thiol results in quenching of fluorescence due to replacement of glucose oxidase by Cys at neutral pH. Second mode is based on fluorescence switch-ON strategy where initial fluorescence is significantly quenched by either excess acid or base and further addition of Cys results in appearance of rosy-red and green fluorescence respectively. Visual colour change and fluorescence emission arises due to etching of Au atoms on the surface by thiol leading to formation of Au nanoclusters. Finally, electrochemical sensing of Cys is also carried out using cyclic voltammetry in 0.1 M PBS solution. These findings provide a suitable platform for Cys detection over a wide range of pH and concentration levels and hence the sensitivity can also be tuned accordingly.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28004748 PMCID: PMC5177922 DOI: 10.1038/srep39452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Pictorial representation of tuning the optical and fluorescence properties of enzyme stabilized Au NPs using pH and utilization of this strategy for multimodal detection of Cys.
Figure 2TEM images of as-prepared GOx–Au NPs (A) and GOx–FL Au NPs (B) obtained upon neutralization. (C) UV–Visible spectra of as-prepared GOx stabilized Au NPs (a) and GOx–FL Au NPs (b). Inset shows the photographs of GOx–FL Au NPs exhibiting a bright yellowish green fluorescence emission (i) and GOx–Au NPs (no fluorescence emission, ii) upon exposure to UV light.
Figure 3(A) PL emission spectra of GOx–FL Au NPs recorded in presence of various concentrations of Cys namely (a) 0 mM, (b) 0.1 mM, (c) 0.2 mM, (d) 0.3 mM, (e) 0.4 mM, (f) 0.5 mM and (g) 0.6 mM respectively. Arrow indicates the direction of increasing concentration of Cys. (B) A plot of relative change in fluorescence intensity (F0/F) of GOx–FL Au NPs vs. concentration of Cys. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent measurements. (C) Comparison of fluorescence quenching efficiency of GOx–FL Au NPs in presence of Cys and various other potential interferences. (D) Photographs of GOx–FL Au NPs solution with the addition of fixed concentration (0.1 mM) of different amino acids and other potentially interfering bio-molecules before and after illumination under UV (365 nm) lamp.
Figure 4Fluorescence emission spectra recorded using GOx–FL Au NPs under neutral (pH = 7) (a), acidic (pH = 5) (b) and basic (pH = 10) (c) conditions before the addition of Cys. Similarly fluorescence spectra recorded for GOx–FL Au NPs under acidic (d) and basic (e) conditions after the addition of a fixed concentration of Cys are also provided. Inset shows the emission spectra recorded under basic condition for GOx–FL Au NPs before (c) and after the addition (e) of Cys.
Figure 5(A) Fluorescence emission spectra of GOx–FL Au NPs recorded at an excitation wavelength of 360 nm under acidic (pH = 5) condition for the addition of different concentrations of Cys namely (a) 0 mM, (b) 1 mM, (c) 2 mM, (d) 3 mM, (e) 4 mM, (f) 5 mM, (g) 6 mM and (h) 7 mM respectively. Arrow indicates the direction of increasing concentration of Cys addition. (B) A plot of relative change in fluorescence intensity (F0/F) of GOx–FL Au NPs as a function of added Cys concentration. Error bars indicate the standard deviation calculated from three independent measurements.
Figure 6(A) Fluorescence emission spectra of GOx–FL Au NPs recorded at an excitation wavelength of 360 nm under basic (pH = 10) condition for the addition of different concentrations of Cys namely (a) 0 μM, (b) 10 μM, (c) 20 μM, (d) 30 μM, (e) 40 μM, (f) 50 μM and (g) 60 μM respectively. Arrow indicates the direction of increasing concentration of Cys addition. (B) A plot of relative change in fluorescence intensity (F0/F) of GOx–FL Au NPs as a function of added Cys concentration at basic pH. Error bars indicate the standard deviation value obtained from three independent measurements.
Figure 7(A) CVs corresponding to GOx–FL Au NPs modified GC electrode in different pH solutions (0.1 M PBS) namely pH = 5 (a), 6 (b), 7 (c) and 8 (d) respectively consisting of 1.0 mM Cys at a fixed scan rate of 50 mV/s. (B) Plots of Ip (a) and Ep (b) corresponding to electrochemical oxidation of Cys vs. pH. Data points are obtained from Figure A. (C) CVs of GOx–FL Au NPs modified GC electrode in 0.1 M PBS solution at a potential scan rate of 50 mV/s for addition of various concentrations of Cys viz., (b) 0.016 mM, (c) 0.033 mM, (d) 0.049 mM, (e) 0.065 mM, (f) 0.082 mM, (g) 0.098 mM, (h) 0.11 mM, (i) 0.12 mM, (j) 0.145 mM and (k) 0.15 mM respectively. For comparison similar CV recorded in the absence of Cys (a) is also shown. (D) A plot of variation in current with respect to added Cys concentrations. Data points are obtained from Figure C.
Comparison of limit of detection (LOD) and sensitivity values obtained in the present work using GOx–FL Au NPs as a probe for Cys detection with that of the other reported materials and methods.
| Colorimetric method | LOD | Sensitivity | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citrate Au NPs | 10 nM | — |
|
| Ag NPRs | 25 nM | — |
|
| Au–CEQC | 40 nM | — |
|
| CMC–Au NPs | 80 μM | — |
|
| FSN–capped Au NPs | 66.7 μM | — |
|
| Au NPs | 0.01 ppm | — |
|
| GOx–FL Au NPs | 37 μM | — | Present work |
|
|
|
|
|
| SG–Hg2+− MSD | 0.0034 μM | — |
|
| GSH–Ag NCs | 10 nM | — |
|
| PMAA–Ag clusters | 20 nM | — |
|
| AIE materials | 0.5 μM | — |
|
| GOx–FL Au NPs | 50 μM | — | Present work |
|
|
|
|
|
| PFS–Au NPs | 25 nM | — |
|
| BSA–Pt–Au NCs | 0.4 μM | — |
|
| y−CDs and Ag+ | 0.25 μM | — |
|
| Au @ C-dot | 50 nM |
| |
| GOx–FL Au NPs (Green FL emission) | 6.8 μM | — | Present work |
| GOx–FL Au NPs (Red FL emission) | 89 μM | — | Present work |
|
|
|
|
|
| BCNT/GC | 0.26 ± 0.01 M | 25.3 ± 1.2 nA/mM |
|
| Au NPs/SG –PEDOT/GC Electrode | 0.02 μM | — |
|
| OMC/GC Electrode | 2.0 nM | 23.6 μA/mM |
|
| Pt/CNTs/graphite | 0.3 μM | — |
|
| FePc–Au NPs/GP | 0.27 μM | 11.24 mA/mM |
|
| GOx–FL Au NPs/GC Electrode | 1.5 μM | 0.037 μA/mM | Present work |
Ag NPRs–Silver Nanoprisms.
CEQC–Carboxyl ethyl quaternized cellulose.
CMC–Carboxymethyl Cellulose.
FSN–Fluorosurfactant.
SG−Hg2+− MSD–Sybre Green- Mercury-Specific DNA.
PMAA–Polymethyl(methacrylic acid).
AIE–Aggregation-induced emission.
BSA–Bovine serum albumin.
y−CDs–Yellow-Emissive N-doped Carbon Dots.
C−dot–Carbon Dot.
BCNT–Boron-doped carbon nanotube.
GC–Glassy Carbon.
SG−PEDOT–Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)- sulfonated grapheme.
OMC–Ordered mesoporous carbon.
CNTs–Carbon nanotubes.
FePc–Iron phthalocyanine.