Literature DB >> 28002546

Use of Risk Models to Predict Death in the Next Year Among Individual Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure.

Larry A Allen1, Daniel D Matlock2, Susan M Shetterly3, Stanley Xu3, Wayne C Levy4, Laura B Portalupi5, Colleen K McIlvennan6, Jerry H Gurwitz7, Eric S Johnson8, David H Smith8, David J Magid9.   

Abstract

Importance: The clinical practice guidelines for heart failure recommend the use of validated risk models to estimate prognosis. Understanding how well models identify individuals who will die in the next year informs decision making for advanced treatments and hospice. Objective: To quantify how risk models calculated in routine practice estimate more than 50% 1-year mortality among ambulatory patients with heart failure who die in the subsequent year. Design, Setting, and Participants: Ambulatory adults with heart failure from 3 integrated health systems were enrolled between 2005 and 2008. The probability of death was estimated using the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) and the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk calculator. Baseline covariates were collected from electronic health records. Missing covariates were imputed. Estimated mortality was compared with actual mortality at both population and individual levels. Main Outcomes and Measures: One-year mortality.
Results: Among 10 930 patients with heart failure, the median age was 77 years, and 48.0% of these patients were female. In the year after study enrollment, 1661 patients died (15.9% by life-table analysis). At the population level, 1-year predicted mortality among the cohort was 9.7% for the SHFM (C statistic of 0.66) and 17.5% for the MAGGIC risk calculator (C statistic of 0.69). At the individual level, the SHFM predicted a more than 50% probability of dying in the next year for 8 of the 1661 patients who died (sensitivity for 1-year death was 0.5%) and for 5 patients who lived at least a year (positive predictive value, 61.5%). The MAGGIC risk calculator predicted a more than 50% probability of dying in the next year for 52 of the 1661 patients who died (sensitivity, 3.1%) and for 63 patients who lived at least a year (positive predictive value, 45.2%). Conversely, the SHFM estimated that 8496 patients (77.8%) had a less than 15% probability of dying at 1 year, yet this lower-risk end of the score range captured nearly two-thirds of deaths (n = 997); similarly, the MAGGIC risk calculator estimated a probability of dying of less than 25% for the majority of patients who died at 1 year (n = 914). Conclusions and Relevance: Although heart failure risk models perform reasonably well at the population level, they do not reliably predict which individual patients will die in the next year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28002546     DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  15 in total

1.  Referral Criteria to Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yuchieh Kathryn Chang; Holland Kaplan; Yimin Geng; Li Mo; Jennifer Philip; Anna Collins; Larry A Allen; John A McClung; Martin A Denvir; David Hui
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 2.  Role of Palliative Care in the Outpatient Management of the Chronic Heart Failure Patient.

Authors:  Sarah Chuzi; Esther S Pak; Akshay S Desai; Kristen G Schaefer; Haider J Warraich
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-12

3.  Non-Concordance between Patient and Clinician Estimates of Prognosis in Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Laura P Gelfman; Harriet Mather; Karen McKendrick; Angela Y Wong; Mathew D Hutchinson; Rachel J Lampert; Hannah I Lipman; Daniel D Matlock; Keith M Swetz; Sean P Pinney; R Sean Morrison; Nathan E Goldstein
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 6.592

4.  Pathological alterations in liver injury following congestive heart failure induced by volume overload in rats.

Authors:  Mohammed Shaqura; Doaa M Mohamed; Noureddin B Aboryag; Lama Bedewi; Lukas Dehe; Sascha Treskatsch; Mehdi Shakibaei; Michael Schäfer; Shaaban A Mousa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Machine Learning Methods Improve Prognostication, Identify Clinically Distinct Phenotypes, and Detect Heterogeneity in Response to Therapy in a Large Cohort of Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Tariq Ahmad; Lars H Lund; Pooja Rao; Rohit Ghosh; Prashant Warier; Benjamin Vaccaro; Ulf Dahlström; Christopher M O'Connor; G Michael Felker; Nihar R Desai
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Machine learning-based mortality prediction of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: the SEMMELWEIS-CRT score.

Authors:  Márton Tokodi; Walter Richard Schwertner; Attila Kovács; Zoltán Tősér; Levente Staub; András Sárkány; Bálint Károly Lakatos; Anett Behon; András Mihály Boros; Péter Perge; Valentina Kutyifa; Gábor Széplaki; László Gellér; Béla Merkely; Annamária Kosztin
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Predictive Value of the Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score in Unselected Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Melissa Lyle; Siu-Hin Wan; Dennis Murphree; Courtney Bennett; Brandon M Wiley; Gregory Barsness; Margaret Redfield; Jacob Jentzer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Risk Assessment in Patients With Diabetes With the TIMI Risk Score for Atherothrombotic Disease.

Authors:  Brian A Bergmark; Deepak L Bhatt; Eugene Braunwald; David A Morrow; Ph Gabriel Steg; Yared Gurmu; Avivit Cahn; Ofri Mosenzon; Itamar Raz; Erin Bohula; Benjamin M Scirica
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic (MAGGIC) Heart Failure Risk Score: Validation of a Simple Tool for the Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rich; Jacob Burns; Benjamin H Freed; Mathew S Maurer; Daniel Burkhoff; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Use of the Palliative Performance Scale to estimate survival among home hospice patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Ruth Masterson Creber; David Russell; Frances Dooley; Lizeyka Jordan; Dawon Baik; Parag Goyal; Scott Hummel; Ellen K Hummel; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.