Andrea H Weinberger1, Philip H Smith, Allison P Funk, Shayna Rabin, Jonathan Shuter. 1. *Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY; †Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; ‡Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, CUNY School of Medicine, New York, NY; §Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY; ‖Stern College for Women, Yeshiva University, New York, NY; and ¶AIDS Center and Division of Infectious Diseases, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH) smoke at higher rates than other adults and experience HIV-related and non-HIV-related adverse smoking consequences. This study conducted a systematic review to synthesize current knowledge about sex differences in smoking behaviors among PLWH. METHODS: Over 3000 abstracts from MEDLINE were reviewed and 79 publications met all the review inclusion criteria (ie, reported data on smoking behaviors for PLWH by sex). Sufficient data were available to conduct a meta-analysis for one smoking variable: current smoking prevalence. RESULTS: Across studies (n = 51), the meta-analytic prevalence of current smoking among female PLWH was 36.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.0% to 45.4%) and male PLWH was 50.3% (95% CI: 44.4% to 56.2%; meta-analytic odds ratio = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.29 to 2.45). When analyses were repeated just on the US studies (n = 23), the prevalence of current smoking was not significantly different for female PLWH (55.1%, 95% CI: 47.6% to 62.5%) compared with male PLWH (55.5%, 95% CI: 48.2% to 62.5%; meta-analytic odds ratio = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.26). Few studies reported data by sex for other smoking variables (eg, quit attempts, noncigarette tobacco product use) and results for many variables were mixed. DISCUSSION: Unlike the general US population, there was no difference in smoking prevalence for female versus male PLWH (both >50%) indicating that HIV infection status was associated with a greater relative increase in smoking for women than men. More research is needed in all areas of smoking behavior of PLWH to understand similarities and differences by sex to provide the best interventions to reduce the high smoking prevalence for all sexes.
BACKGROUND:Persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH) smoke at higher rates than other adults and experience HIV-related and non-HIV-related adverse smoking consequences. This study conducted a systematic review to synthesize current knowledge about sex differences in smoking behaviors among PLWH. METHODS: Over 3000 abstracts from MEDLINE were reviewed and 79 publications met all the review inclusion criteria (ie, reported data on smoking behaviors for PLWH by sex). Sufficient data were available to conduct a meta-analysis for one smoking variable: current smoking prevalence. RESULTS: Across studies (n = 51), the meta-analytic prevalence of current smoking among female PLWH was 36.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.0% to 45.4%) and male PLWH was 50.3% (95% CI: 44.4% to 56.2%; meta-analytic odds ratio = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.29 to 2.45). When analyses were repeated just on the US studies (n = 23), the prevalence of current smoking was not significantly different for female PLWH (55.1%, 95% CI: 47.6% to 62.5%) compared with male PLWH (55.5%, 95% CI: 48.2% to 62.5%; meta-analytic odds ratio = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.26). Few studies reported data by sex for other smoking variables (eg, quit attempts, noncigarette tobacco product use) and results for many variables were mixed. DISCUSSION: Unlike the general US population, there was no difference in smoking prevalence for female versus male PLWH (both >50%) indicating that HIV infection status was associated with a greater relative increase in smoking for women than men. More research is needed in all areas of smoking behavior of PLWH to understand similarities and differences by sex to provide the best interventions to reduce the high smoking prevalence for all sexes.
Authors: Till Neumann; T Woiwod; A Neumann; B Ross; C Von Birgelen; L Volbracht; Norbert H Brockmeyer; G Gerken; R Erbel Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2004-02-27 Impact factor: 2.175
Authors: Vicente Estrada; José Ignacio Bernardino; Mar Masiá; José Antonio Iribarren; Alejandra Ortega; Fernando Lozano; Celia Miralles; Julián Olalla; Jesús Santos; María Jesús Pérez Elías; Pere Domingo; Arturo Fernández Cruz Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2015-01-22
Authors: Israel T Agaku; Brian A King; Corinne G Husten; Rebecca Bunnell; Bridget K Ambrose; S Sean Hu; Enver Holder-Hayes; Hannah R Day Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Julian J Weiss; Laura Sanchez; Jane Hubbard; Janet Lo; Steven K Grinspoon; Kathleen V Fitch Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: D R Bailey Miles; Usama Bilal; Heidi E Hutton; Bryan Lau; Catherine R Lesko; Anthony Fojo; Mary E McCaul; Jeanne Keruly; Richard D Moore; Geetanjali Chander Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2019
Authors: Andrea H Weinberger; Elizabeth K Seng; Joseph W Ditre; Melody Willoughby; Jonathan Shuter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea H Weinberger; Raina D Pang; Elizabeth K Seng; Jacob Levin; Hannah Esan; Kate S Segal; Jonathan Shuter Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Sally B Coburn; Jodie Dionne-Odom; Maria L Alcaide; Caitlin A Moran; Lisa Rahangdale; Elizabeth T Golub; Leslie Stewart Massad; Dominika Seidman; Katherine G Michel; Howard Minkoff; Kerry Murphy; Todd T Brown; Kala Visvanathan; Bryan Lau; Keri N Althoff Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Krishna P Reddy; Chung Yin Kong; Emily P Hyle; Travis P Baggett; Mingshu Huang; Robert A Parker; A David Paltiel; Elena Losina; Milton C Weinstein; Kenneth A Freedberg; Rochelle P Walensky Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 44.409