Literature DB >> 28002118

Hemodynamic response to primary prophylactic therapy with nonselective β-blockers is related to a reduction of first variceal bleeding risk in liver cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Annarein J C Kerbert1, Fang W T Chiang, Mark van der Werf, Theo Stijnen, Hilde Slingerland, Hein W Verspaget, Bart van Hoek, Minneke J Coenraad.   

Abstract

The current primary prophylaxis for esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients consists of nonselective β-blocker (NSBB) therapy. However, only approximately half of the patients achieve a sufficient hemodynamic response to NSBB therapy. Clinical application of hemodynamic response monitoring is still under debate. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the potential clinical value of monitoring the hemodynamic response to NSBB therapy using hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements in the primary prophylaxis for variceal bleeding. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the COCHRANE Library. Randomized-controlled trials and case series that included cirrhotic patients receiving primary prophylaxis for variceal bleeding with NSBBs and hemodynamic response monitoring using HVPG measurements were included for analysis. The primary outcome measure was variceal bleeding. A fixed-effect analysis was carried out using the Mantel-Haenszel method for relative risks. Six of the 1172 papers found were selected on the basis of stringent selection criteria. Hemodynamic response (HVPG ≤12 mmHg and/or a reduction of ≥20%, or ≥10% in one study, from baseline) to β-blocker therapy was associated significantly with a lower risk of variceal bleeding (relative risk=0.13, 95% confidence interval=0.06-0.29) compared with a nonresponse. Patients achieving a hemodynamic response to NSBB therapy have a lower risk of variceal bleeding than hemodynamic nonresponders. Hemodynamic monitoring in primary prophylaxis is of potential clinical value and requires further assessment in large cohort randomized-controlled trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28002118     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  4 in total

1.  Increase in Free Hepatic Venous Pressure Response to Beta-Blockers Predicts Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients.

Authors:  Huiwen Guo; Jiangqiang Xiao; Yi Wang; Ming Zhang; Yuzheng Zhuge; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Antibiotics and probiotics on hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhosis: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haonan Zhang; Jian Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Considerations of elderly factors to manage the complication of liver cirrhosis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Kenya Kamimura; Akira Sakamaki; Hiroteru Kamimura; Toru Setsu; Takeshi Yokoo; Masaaki Takamura; Shuji Terai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for Liver Cirrhosis 2020.

Authors:  Hitoshi Yoshiji; Sumiko Nagoshi; Takemi Akahane; Yoshinari Asaoka; Yoshiyuki Ueno; Koji Ogawa; Takumi Kawaguchi; Masayuki Kurosaki; Isao Sakaida; Masahito Shimizu; Makiko Taniai; Shuji Terai; Hiroki Nishikawa; Yoichi Hiasa; Hisashi Hidaka; Hiroto Miwa; Kazuaki Chayama; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Tooru Shimosegawa; Tetsuo Takehara; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 7.527

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.