Literature DB >> 28000268

Implants for elderly patients.

Martin Schimmel, Frauke Müller, Valérie Suter, Daniel Buser.   

Abstract

In the developed world, the large birth cohorts of the so-called baby boomer generation have arrived in medical and dental practices. Often, elderly patients are 'young-old' baby boomers in whom partial edentulism is the predominant indication for implant therapy. However, the generation 85+ years of age represents a new challenge for the dental profession, as their lives are frequently dominated by dependency, multimorbidity and frailty. In geriatric implant dentistry, treatment planning is highly individualized, as interindividual differences become more pronounced with age. Nevertheless, there are four typical indications for implant therapy: (i) avoidance of removable partial prostheses; (ii) preservation of existing removable partial prostheses; (iii) stabilization of Kennedy Class I removable partial prostheses; and (iv) stabilization of complete prostheses. From a surgical point of view, two very important aspects must be considered when planning implant surgery in elderly patients: first, the consistent strive to minimize morbidity; and, second, the fact that coexisting medical risk factors are significantly more common in elderly patients. Modern three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography imaging is often indicated in order to plan minimally invasive implant surgery. Computer-assisted implant surgery might allow flapless implant surgery, which offers a low level of postoperative morbidity and a minimal risk of postsurgical bleeding. Short and reduced-diameter implants are now utilized much more often than a decade ago. Two-stage surgical procedures should be avoided in elderly patients. Implant restorations for elderly patients should be designed so that they can be modified to become low-maintenance prostheses, or even be removed, as a strategy to facilitate oral hygiene and comfort in the final stage of life.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28000268     DOI: 10.1111/prd.12166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Periodontol 2000        ISSN: 0906-6713            Impact factor:   7.589


  15 in total

1.  Interspecies Comparison of Alveolar Bone Biology, Part I: Morphology and Physiology of Pristine Bone.

Authors:  I Pilawski; U S Tulu; P Ticha; P Schüpbach; H Traxler; Q Xu; J Pan; B R Coyac; X Yuan; Y Tian; Y Liu; J Chen; Y Erdogan; M Arioka; M Armaro; M Wu; J B Brunski; J A Helms
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2020-07-13

2.  A Comparative Assessment of Implant Site Viability in Humans and Rats.

Authors:  C-H Chen; X Pei; U S Tulu; M Aghvami; C-T Chen; D Gaudillière; M Arioka; M Maghazeh Moghim; O Bahat; M Kolinski; T R Crosby; A Felderhoff; J B Brunski; J A Helms
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  [Research advances in the use of digital surgical guides in implantology].

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Wang; Ai-Peng Liu; Wen-Zheng Deng
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

4.  An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Oded Bahat; Xing Yin; Stefan Holst; Ion Zabalegui; Eva Berroeta; Javier Pérez; Peter Wöhrle; Norbert Sörgel; John Brunski; Jill A Helms
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Associations among the anterior maxillary dental arch form, alveolar bone thickness, and the sagittal root position of the maxillary central incisors in relation to immediate implant placement: A cone-beam computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Suttikiat Somvasoontra; Wichit Tharanon; Pravej Serichetaphongse; Atiphan Pimkhaokham
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Menchini-Fabris; Simone Marconcini; Enrica Giammarinaro; Antonio Barone; Paolo Toti; Ugo Covani
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  Current Trends in Research on Bone Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Xu Liu; Yuli Shang; Feng Qiao; Gang Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Considerations for the Prosthetic Dental Treatment of Geriatric Patients in Germany.

Authors:  Ina Nitschke; Anja Wendland; Sophia Weber; Julia Jockusch; Bernd Lethaus; Sebastian Hahnel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Implant treatment in ultra-aged society.

Authors:  Yuji Sato; Noboru Kitagawa; Akio Isobe
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  How old is old for implant therapy in terms of early implant losses?

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Maria Ebner; Marianne Knibbe; Nikolaos Pandis; Ulrike Kuchler; Christian Ulm; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 8.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.