K Bürger1,2, T Arzberger2,3,4, J Stephan1,3, J Levin2,5, D Edbauer6,7. 1. Institut für Schlaganfall und Demenzforschung, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland. 2. Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Feodor-Lynen-Str. 17, 81377, München, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland. 4. Zentrum für Neuropathologie und Prionforschung, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland. 5. Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland. 6. Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Feodor-Lynen-Str. 17, 81377, München, Deutschland. dieter.edbauer@dzne.de. 7. Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland. dieter.edbauer@dzne.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) includes a spectrum of heterogeneous clinical and neuropathological diseases. In a strict sense this includes the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and both variants can be associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FTD-ALS). In a broader sense FTLD also includes progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS). In recent years the strong genetic component of FTLD has become increasingly clear. OBJECTIVE: The association between clinical presentation, neuropathology, genetics and pathophysiological mechanisms of FTLD are presented. RESULTS: The diagnostic criteria and tools for the clinical differential diagnosis of FTLD are presented. At autopsy patients show neuronal and glial inclusions of Tau, TDP-43 or FUS. While Tau pathology is often associated with extrapyramidal symptoms, patients with TDP-43 and FUS inclusions often also show signs of ALS. Pathogenic mutations directly increase the aggregation propensity of these proteins or impair protein degradation through autophagy or the proteasome. Pathogenic mutations in most FTLD genes trigger cytoplasmic missorting and aggregation of the RNA-binding protein TDP-43 and thus lead to a nuclear loss of TDP-43 function. Microgliosis and mutations in GRN and TREM2 suggest an important role of neuroinflammation in FTLD. CONCLUSION: There is still no causal therapy for FTLD but preclinical studies focusing on pathogenic mutations in C9orf72, GRN and Tau may lead to clinical trials soon; therefore, establishing large well characterized patient cohorts is crucial for trial readiness.
BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) includes a spectrum of heterogeneous clinical and neuropathological diseases. In a strict sense this includes the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and both variants can be associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FTD-ALS). In a broader sense FTLD also includes progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS). In recent years the strong genetic component of FTLD has become increasingly clear. OBJECTIVE: The association between clinical presentation, neuropathology, genetics and pathophysiological mechanisms of FTLD are presented. RESULTS: The diagnostic criteria and tools for the clinical differential diagnosis of FTLD are presented. At autopsy patients show neuronal and glial inclusions of Tau, TDP-43 or FUS. While Tau pathology is often associated with extrapyramidal symptoms, patients with TDP-43 and FUS inclusions often also show signs of ALS. Pathogenic mutations directly increase the aggregation propensity of these proteins or impair protein degradation through autophagy or the proteasome. Pathogenic mutations in most FTLD genes trigger cytoplasmic missorting and aggregation of the RNA-binding protein TDP-43 and thus lead to a nuclear loss of TDP-43 function. Microgliosis and mutations in GRN and TREM2 suggest an important role of neuroinflammation in FTLD. CONCLUSION: There is still no causal therapy for FTLD but preclinical studies focusing on pathogenic mutations in C9orf72, GRN and Tau may lead to clinical trials soon; therefore, establishing large well characterized patient cohorts is crucial for trial readiness.
Authors: M L Gorno-Tempini; A E Hillis; S Weintraub; A Kertesz; M Mendez; S F Cappa; J M Ogar; J D Rohrer; S Black; B F Boeve; F Manes; N F Dronkers; R Vandenberghe; K Rascovsky; K Patterson; B L Miller; D S Knopman; J R Hodges; M M Mesulam; M Grossman Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Johannes Levin; Thomas H Bak; Axel Rominger; Erik Mille; Thomas Arzberger; Armin Giese; Nibal Ackl; Stefan Lorenzl; Benedikt Bader; Maximilian Patzig; Kai Bötzel; Adrian Danek Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-07-05 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: J C Morris; A Heyman; R C Mohs; J P Hughes; G van Belle; G Fillenbaum; E D Mellits; C Clark Journal: Neurology Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Keith A Josephs; Melissa E Murray; Jennifer L Whitwell; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Stephen D Weigand; Leonard Petrucelli; Amanda M Liesinger; Ronald C Petersen; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Heiko Braak; Irina Alafuzoff; Thomas Arzberger; Hans Kretzschmar; Kelly Del Tredici Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2006-08-12 Impact factor: 17.088