Literature DB >> 27999853

Nutritional Follow-Up after Discharge Prevents Readmission to Hospital - A Randomized Clinical Trial.

J Lindegaard Pedersen1, P U Pedersen, E M Damsgaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two individualized nutritional follow-up intervention strategies (home visit or telephone consultation) with no follow-up, with regard to acute readmissions to hospital at two points in time, 30 and 90 days after discharge from hospital.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with two intervention groups and one control group, and monitoring on readmission at 30 and 90 days after discharge.
SETTING: Intervention in the participants' homes after discharge from hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion: Malnourished geriatric patients and patients at risk of malnutrition (MNA<24), aged 75 years and older, living at home and alone. Exclusion: Nursing home residents and patients with terminal illnesses or cognitive impairment. Randomization: Upon discharge, the patients were stratified according to nutritional status (MNA), and assigned to one of three groups: 'home visit', 'telephone', or 'control' group. INTERVENTION: Individualized nutritional counselling of the patient and the patient's daily home carer by a clinical dietician one, two, and four weeks after discharge from hospital. The counselling was either in-person at the patient's homes, or over the telephone. All patients received a diet plan on discharge. The control group received standard care, but no follow-up after discharge. MEASUREMENTS: Information on readmissions to hospital and mortality at 30 and 90 days after discharge was obtained from electronic patient records. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were carried out.
RESULTS: Two-hundred and eight participants were randomized, 73 to home visits, 68 to the telephone consultation group, and 67 to the control group. The mean age of the participants was 86.1 years. Home visit participants had a lower risk of readmission to hospital compared to control participants at 30 days after discharge (HR=0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9, p=0.03) and 90 days after discharge (HR=0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.8, p<0.01). No significant difference was detected between the telephone consultation group and the control group, at either 30 days (HR=0.6, 95% CI: 0.3-1.3, p=0.18) or 90 days after discharge (HR=0.7, 95% CI: 0.4-1.3, p=0.23). The PP analysis revealed that the risk of readmission was significantly lower in the home visit group compared to the control group and the telephone consultation group compared to the control group, and this was evident at 30 days as well as at 90 days after discharge.
CONCLUSION: An individualized nutritional follow-up performed as home visits seems to reduce readmission to hospital 30 and 90 days after discharge. Intervention by telephone consultations may also prevent readmission, but only among participants who receive the full intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27999853     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-016-0745-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  32 in total

1.  Views of community-dwelling, old-old people on barriers and aids to nutritional health.

Authors:  Bonnie L Callen; Thelma J Wells
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.176

Review 2.  Oral nutritional support of older (65 years+) medical and surgical patients after discharge from hospital: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Anne Marie Beck; Mette Holst; Henrik Højgaard Rasmussen
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 3.  The consequences of malnutrition following discharge from rehabilitation to the community: a systematic review of current evidence in older adults.

Authors:  S Marshall; J Bauer; E Isenring
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 3.089

Review 4.  Nutrition in care homes and home care: recommendations - a summary based on the report approved by the Council of Europe.

Authors:  M Arvanitakis; P Coppens; L Doughan; A Van Gossum
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 5.  Individualised dietary counselling for nutritionally at-risk older patients following discharge from acute hospital to home: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Munk; U Tolstrup; A M Beck; M Holst; H H Rasmussen; K Hovhannisyan; T Thomsen
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.089

Review 6.  Risk factors for hospital readmissions in elderly patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  L García-Pérez; R Linertová; A Lorenzo-Riera; J R Vázquez-Díaz; B Duque-González; A Sarría-Santamera
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2011-05-10

Review 7.  A systematic review of compliance to oral nutritional supplements.

Authors:  Gary P Hubbard; Marinos Elia; Anne Holdoway; Rebecca J Stratton
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 8.  Identifying the elderly at risk for malnutrition. The Mini Nutritional Assessment.

Authors:  Yves Guigoz; Sylvie Lauque; Bruno J Vellas
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.076

9.  French Multicenter Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Admission to the Emergency Department of the Over-80s.

Authors:  E Menand; E Lenain; C Lazarovici; G Chatellier; O Saint-Jean; D Somme; A Corvol
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of oral nutritional supplements on hospital readmissions.

Authors:  Rebecca J Stratton; X Hébuterne; M Elia
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 10.895

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease-related malnutrition in adults.

Authors:  Christine Baldwin; Marian Ae de van der Schueren; Hinke M Kruizenga; Christine Elizabeth Weekes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-21

2.  Effect of nutritional interventions on discharged older patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tina Munk; Jonas Anias Svendsen; Anne Wilkens Knudsen; Tanja Bak Østergaard; Anne Marie Beck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Clinical Interventions to Improve Nutritional Care in Older Adults and Patients in Primary Healthcare - A Scoping Review of Current Practices of Health Care Practitioners.

Authors:  Sonja Lindner-Rabl; Valentina Wagner; Andreas Matijevic; Carolin Herzog; Christina Lampl; Julia Traub; Regina Roller-Wirnsberger
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Optimization of Nutrition And Medication (OptiNAM) for acutely admitted older patients: protocol for a randomized single-blinded controlled trial.

Authors:  Aino L Andersen; Morten B Houlind; Rikke L Nielsen; Lillian M Jørgensen; Charlotte Treldal; Morten Damgaard; Anne Kathrine Bengaard; Helle Gybel Juul-Larsen; Louise Bolvig Laursen; Esben Iversen; Marie Kruse; Anne M L Pedersen; Mads Hornum; Anne M Beck; Mette M Pedersen; Mikkel Z Ankarfeldt; Janne Petersen; Ove Andersen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Scoping review protocol: effectiveness of individualised nutritional care plans to reduce malnutrition during hospitalisation and up to 3 months after discharge.

Authors:  Kari Ingstad; Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt; Ingjerd Gåre Kymre; Conni Skrubbeltrang; Preben Ulrich Pedersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Effectiveness of individualised nutritional care plans to reduce malnutrition during hospitalisation and up to 3 months post-discharge: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Kari Ingstad; Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt; Ingjerd Gåre Kymre; Conni Skrubbeltrang; Preben Pedersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Towards developing a Core Outcome Set for malnutrition intervention studies in older adults: a scoping review to identify frequently used research outcomes.

Authors:  M Visser; N Mendonça; C Avgerinou; T Cederholm; A J Cruz-Jentoft; S Goisser; E Kiesswetter; H M Siebentritt; D Volkert; G Torbahn
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.