Literature DB >> 27999724

THE RELIABILITY OF FABER TEST HIP RANGE OF MOTION MEASUREMENTS.

Jennifer J Bagwell1, Lauren Bauer1, Marissa Gradoz1, Terry L Grindstaff1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Flexion ABduction External Rotation (FABER) test is typically used as a provocation special test, but has also been used as a measurement of combined hip range of motion (ROM). It is thought that limited ROM with this measurement may be indicative of hip pathology. To date, normative data, reliability, and minimal detectable change (MDC) of such measurements have not been established.
PURPOSE: To determine normative FABER height, assess inter- and intra-rater reliability and MDC for FABER, and compare traditional FABER measurements to methods which account for differences in thigh length. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory reliability study.
METHODS: Nineteen healthy participants without low back, hip, or knee pain in the preceding three months were recruited. Measurements were performed during two sessions (three to seven days between sessions) by three clinicians. FABER height and thigh length measurements were performed. Thigh length normalized FABER range of motion (ROM) and side-to-side FABER ROM symmetry were calculated. One tester also measured FABER with a digital inclinometer. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were calculated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and mean MDC values were calculated.
RESULTS: Mean values for FABER height and normalized FABER ROM were 12.4 ± 2.8 cm and 0.30 ± 0.07, respectively. Inter-rater reliability for FABER and normalized FABER were good (ICC 0.67-0.68) and between session intra-rater reliability were good to excellent (ICC 0.76-0.86). Mean FABER and normalized FABER ROM MDC were 3.7 cm and 0.04, respectively. Mean FABER ROM symmetry was 2.0 ± 0.9 cm with poor inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.20), poor to good intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.38-0.66), and mean MDC of 4.0 cm. FABER measured with a ruler, normalized FABER ROM, and inclinometry all resulted in excellent intra-rater reliability, with the highest ICC being demonstrated for inclinometry (ICC 0.86, 0.86, and 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, FABER measurements were reliable, whether normalized to thigh length or not. Furthermore, use of inclinometry may increase reliability. Reliability was poor to good when assessing symmetry between limbs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FABER; femoroacetabular impingement; hip; range of motion; reliability

Year:  2016        PMID: 27999724      PMCID: PMC5159634     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  13 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular labral tears of the hip: examination and diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  RobRoy L Martin; Keelan R Enseki; Peter Draovitch; Talia Trapuzzano; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  The diagnostic validity of hip provocation maneuvers to detect intra-articular hip pathology.

Authors:  Erin Maslowski; William Sullivan; Jeri Forster Harwood; Peter Gonzalez; Marla Kaufman; Armando Vidal; Venu Akuthota
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Prevalence of increased alpha angles as a measure of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement in youth ice hockey players.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Charles P Ho; Karen K Briggs; Justin Stull; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Reliability of hip examination tests for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Charles Ratzlaff; Jacqueline Simatovic; Hubert Wong; Linda Li; Allison Ezzat; Dolores Langford; John M Esdaile; Carol Kennedy; Patrick Embley; Darryl Caves; Trish Hopkins; Jolanda Cibere
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  In-vivo hip arthrokinematics during supine clinical exams: Application to the study of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Accuracy and feasibility of dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to quantify in vivo hip kinematics during clinical exams.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Steve A Maas; Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; R Brian Maxwell; Todd L Johnston; Mara Schenker; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Hip arthroscopy and femoroacetabular impingement in the pediatric patient.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Diana C Patterson; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Hip joint pathology: clinical presentation and correlation between magnetic resonance arthrography, ultrasound, and arthroscopic findings in 25 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Bruce Mitchell; Paul McCrory; Peter Brukner; John O'Donnell; Emma Colson; Robert Howells
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics?

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Inger Mechlenburg; John Gelineck; Lars Bolvig; Steffen Jacobsen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Ivan Urits; Aaron Burshtein; Medha Sharma; Lauren Testa; Peter A Gold; Vwaire Orhurhu; Omar Viswanath; Mark R Jones; Moises A Sidransky; Boris Spektor; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-03-11

2.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging study of the hip joint capsule in the flexion abduction external rotation position.

Authors:  Masahiro Tsutsumi; Isao Yamaguchi; Akimoto Nimura; Hajime Utsunomiya; Keiichi Akita; Shintarou Kudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Does This Patient Have Hip Osteoarthritis?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Metcalfe; Daniel C Perry; Henry A Claireaux; David L Simel; Cheryl K Zogg; Matthew L Costa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Posterior Extra-articular Ischiofemoral Impingement Can Be Caused by the Lesser and Greater Trochanter in Patients With Increased Femoral Version: Dynamic 3D CT-Based Hip Impingement Simulation of a Modified FABER Test.

Authors:  Till D Lerch; Sébastien Zwingelstein; Florian Schmaranzer; Adam Boschung; Markus S Hanke; Inga A S Todorski; Simon D Steppacher; Nicolas Gerber; Guodong Zeng; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-28

5.  Hip Joint Torsional Loading Before and After Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Hadi El Daou; Marcus J K Bankes; Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 6.202

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.