Literature DB >> 27999624

Complete genome sequence of new bacteriophage phiE142, which causes simultaneously lysis of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica.

Luis Amarillas1, Cristobal Chaidez2, Arturo González-Robles3, Josefina León-Félix4.   

Abstract

The emergence of antibiotic-resistant foodborne bacteria is a global health problem that requires immediate attention. Bacteriophages are a promising biotechnological alternative approach against bacterial pathogens. However, a detailed analysis of phage genomes is essential to assess the safety of the phages prior to their use as biocontrol agents. Therefore, here we report the complete genome sequence of bacteriophage phiE142, which is able to lyse Salmonella and multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains. Bacteriophage phiE142 belongs to the Myoviridae family due to the presence of long non-flexible tail and icosahedral head. The genome is composed of 121,442 bp and contains 194 ORFs, and 2 tRNAs. Furthermore, the phiE142 genome does not contain any genes coding for food-borne allergens, antibiotics resistance, virulence factors, or associated with lysogenic conversion. The bacteriophage phiE142 is characterized by broad host range and compelling genetic attributes making them potential candidates as a biocontrol agent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterobacteriaceae bacteriophage; Genome sequence; Potential biocontrol agent; Short genome report; phiE142

Year:  2016        PMID: 27999624      PMCID: PMC5154165          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0211-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Foodborne diseases are an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, therefore are a serious public health problem [1]. Bacteria cause the majorities of foodborne illnesses; and are among the most common foodborne pathogens that affect millions of people annually [2]. Furthermore, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and strains makes more difficult its control [3]. Hence, novel control methods for reducing the risk of bacterial food contamination, which are both environmental friendly, are urgently needed. In this context, bacteriophages have several potential applications in the food industry; these killing-bacteria viruses are alternatives to conventional antimicrobials method for the control of pathogenic bacteria and have great potential in the improvement of food safety [4-6]. Bacteriophages suitable for biocontrol purposes must be genetically sequenced to ensure that are strictly lytic (always lyse infected cells host), does not encode any bacterial virulence factors or proteins with a potential to cause allergenicity [7, 8]. The primary aim of our research group is increase knowledge of phage biodiversity and contribute to the understanding of different types of phages in several regions of Sinaloa, an important agricultural region in Northwestern Mexico. Recently, a new bacteriophage, designated as phiE142, one of phages isolated, exhibits a high potential as a biocontrol agent [9]. However, information about genome of phage phiE142 is still limited; therefore, to further understand the phage biology, the genome was sequenced.

Organism information

Classification and features

The bacteriophage phiE142 was previously isolated in Food and Environmental Microbiology Laboratory at the Research Center for Food and Development from animal feces samples collected on a farm in Northwestern Mexico. An strain EC-48 (bacterial used for bacteriophage propagation and titration), was also isolated from the same geographical region two years before the isolation of the phage [10]. Phage phiE142 produced clear plaques of 2 to 3 mm in diameter on the EC-48 lawn; the plaques were already visible after four to six hours of incubation time at 37 °C. We analyzed the lytic host range of phage using spot tests assays of different bacterial, including 48 strains and 33 strains (Additional file 1: Table S1). Based upon spot testing results, the phage phiE142 had lytic activity against 76% of the strains and 29% of strains tested. These results indicate that bacteriophage phiE142 has the potential to be evaluated as an alternative strategy to biocontrol of and . The phiE142 phage was stained with 2% uranyl acetate and examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and classified into its appropriate viral morphotype according to Ackermann’s classification [11]. The analysis suggests that phage phiE142 belongs to the order Caudovirales and family Myoviridae based on the presence of almost isometric head with an average diameter of ∼ 58 nm, long non-flexible contractile tail about 120 nm in length (Fig. 1) [12]. Phage phiE142 has a genome of 121,442 bp, with a coding region of 94.4%, GC content of 37.4%, and the gene density is 1.60. It contains 194 coding sequences ranging from 102 bp to 3,300 bp, with 53 genes on the positive strand and 141 genes on the negative strand. Phylogenetic characteristics of this phage are indicated in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of bacteriophage phiE142, which exhibits an icosahedral head, long and non-flexible tail. This morphology corresponds to the Myoviridae family

Table 1

Classification and general features of Enterobacteria phage phiE142 according to the MIGS recommendation [29]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain: viruses, dsDNA viruses, no RNA stageTAS [11]
Phylum: unassigned
Class: unassigned
Order: Caudovirales TAS [11]
Family: Myoviridae TAS [11]
Genus: unassigned
Species: unassigned
Strain: phiE142
Gram stainNot-applicate
Particle shapeIcosahedral head with long contractile tailIDA
MotilityNot-applicateIDA
SporulationNot-applicateIDA
Temperature rangeNot-reported
Optimum temperatureNot-reported
pH range; OptimumNot-reported
Carbon sourceNot-applicate
MIGS-6HabitatEquine gutIDA
MIGS-6.3SalinityNot-reported
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementNot-applicate
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipIntracellular parasite of E. coli strain EC-48IDA
MIGS-14PathogenicityLytic phage of E. coli strain EC-48IDA
MIGS-4Geographic locationElota, Sinaloa, MéxicoIDA
MIGS-5Sample collectionMarch 04, 2014IDA
MIGS-4.1Latitude23°54′35.8″NIDA
MIGS-4.2Longitude106°54′28.2″WIDA
MIGS-4.3Depth0 mIDA
MIGS-4.4Altitude20 mIDA

a Evidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement. These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [30]

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of bacteriophage phiE142, which exhibits an icosahedral head, long and non-flexible tail. This morphology corresponds to the Myoviridae family Classification and general features of Enterobacteria phage phiE142 according to the MIGS recommendation [29] a Evidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement. These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [30] The sequence of DNA polymerase has become a commonly-used marker for constructing phylogenetic analysis, therefore the phylogenetic tree was performed based of DNA polymerase deduced amino acid sequences. According to the phylogenetic tree, the phage phiE142 and others eight phages that infect the bacterial family were clustered in the same group (Figs. 2 and 3). All of these phages are members of the Tevenvirinae subfamily and are strictly lytic (Based on PHACTS program server). Considering the close relationship among these phages, it is likely that phiE142 also belongs to this genus. This result confirms the findings obtained by electron microscopy.
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree based on the predicted amino acid sequences of the DNA polymerase of 17 bacteriophages. Phylogenetic tree was performed in MEGA 6.0 version by the neighbor joining method with the Jukes Cantor model. The percentages of bootstrap samples (of 1,000) are indicated for each internal branch. The scale bar indicates the proportion of substitutions per site

Fig. 3

Diagram of bacteriophage genome. The arrows indicated open reading frame (ORF), the orientation of which shows the direction of transcription. Putative genes are colored according to the predicted functions of their products: Phage structural proteins (blue arrows), DNA regulation module (green arrows), packaging module (pink arrows), host lysis proteins (red arrows), and hypothetical proteins (gray arrows)

Phylogenetic tree based on the predicted amino acid sequences of the DNA polymerase of 17 bacteriophages. Phylogenetic tree was performed in MEGA 6.0 version by the neighbor joining method with the Jukes Cantor model. The percentages of bootstrap samples (of 1,000) are indicated for each internal branch. The scale bar indicates the proportion of substitutions per site Diagram of bacteriophage genome. The arrows indicated open reading frame (ORF), the orientation of which shows the direction of transcription. Putative genes are colored according to the predicted functions of their products: Phage structural proteins (blue arrows), DNA regulation module (green arrows), packaging module (pink arrows), host lysis proteins (red arrows), and hypothetical proteins (gray arrows)

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The bacteriophage phiE142 is one of the first genome to be completely sequenced publicly available for a phage infecting and strains isolated from environmental sources in Northwest Mexico. The analysis of more genomes of bacteriophages is necessary to increase our understanding of the genetic diversity of bacteriophages, phage biology, basic molecular mechanisms, and provide a deeper insight into the relationship of phages with their hosts. Furthermore, analysis of phage genomes may reveal novel antimicrobial peptides and enzymes with bactericidal activity. In addition, the genome well understood is an essential requisite to ensure the safety of the phages prior to their use as biocontrol agents. Therefore, the genome project was deposited in the Genomes On Line Database (GOLD). The genome sequence of bacteriophage phiE142 was deposited in GenBank under accession number KU255730. The summary of genome project is available in the Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityFinishing
MIGS-28Libraries usedStandard Illumina paired-end
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina HiSeq
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage~10,000×
MIGS 30AssemblersVelvet-Geneious R8
MIGS 32Gene calling methodGeneious R8
Locus TagphiE142_
Genbank IDKU255730.1
GenBank Date of ReleaseJanuary 19, 2016
GOLD IDGp0128385
BIOPROJECTNAa
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierNAa
Project relevanceBacteriophage candidate as a biological control agent
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

Standard double-layer agar plate method was used to obtain high-titer stocks of the phage phiE142 [13], with some modifications. Briefly, 100 μl of phage stock and 1 ml of overnight culture of strain EC-48 were mixed with 3 ml TSB with 0.4% agarose, spread on TSA plates, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. After, phage was subsequently collected by adding 6 ml of SM buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4, 0.01% gelatin) to the surface of each plate and the soft agar was scraped off the surface of the agar plates. Cell debris was removed by subsequent centrifugation at 5,500 × g for 10 min, the supernatant was filtered with 0.22 μm syringe filters, and phage particles were precipitated by centrifugation at 40,000 × g at 4 ° C for 2 h. The phage pellet was suspended in SM buffer and stored at 4°C. Bacteriophage DNA was isolated by the method of proteinase K and phenolchloroform as previously described [14], with minor modifications. One milliliter of purified phage suspension was treated with 1 μg/ml of DNaseI and RNaseA (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, sodium dodecyl sulfate (final concentration, 0.5%), EDTA (20 mM, pH 8.0), and proteinase K (final concentration, 25 μg/ml) were added, and the suspension was incubated at 56 °C for 1 h. After proteins were removed by an equal volume of phenol-chloroform (1:1), and DNA was precipitated from the aqueous phase by cold ethanol. Following centrifugation at 15, 000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, the pellet was washed twice with 70% ethanol, centrifuged at the same conditions. Finally, the dried DNA pellet was suspended in nuclease-free water. Concentration of phage DNA was estimated with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE) and also the quality of extracted DNA was also tested visually with electrophoresis on a 1% agarose.

Genome sequencing and assembly

High-throughput DNA Sequencing of phage genomic DNA was performed using HiSeq 2000 technology (Illumina) to produce 100 bp paired-end reads, library construction and sequencing were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In total, about 18 million pair reads of 100 bases in length were obtained with a quality filter threshold of Q30. The reads were analyzed and quality checked using FastQC and Geneious software package R8 (Biomatters Ltd., New Zealand) was used to trim raw reads with a low quality score. The de novo assembly was conducted with Velvet (implemented in Geneious, running VelvetOptimiser for selection of k-mer), resulting in one final contig with coverage from approximately 10,000-fold. Additional manual functional annotation and genome map was performed using Geneious software.

Genome annotation

Open reading frames (ORFs) were identified using Glimmer 3.02 [15], GeneMark.hmm [16], and ORF Finder [17]. The putative functions of the ORFs were analyzed by protein BLASTp searches, with a cut off E value of 10−4. Predicted protein sequences were analyzed against InterProScan [18], Pfam [19] and TMHMM Server version 2.0 [20] for conservative domain identification. Signal peptides were predicted using SignalP 4.1. The search of putative tRNA encoding genes was done using ARAGORN [21] and tRNAscan-SE [22]. The origin of replication was predicted using a GC-skew plot generated by GenSkew [23]. Moreover, all identified ORFs were compared against the virulence factor database [24] and the ResFinder database [25]. Additionally, the predicted phage protein sequences were searched to identify proteins potentially allergenic using tools from the Food Allergy Research and Resource Programme [26]. The lifestyle of the phages was predicted using the PHACTS program [27]. Whole genome comparisons were carried out using Mauve [28].

Genome properties

The detailed annotation information for phage genome was summarized in Table 3. The phage has a DNA genome consisting of 121,442 bp with a GC content of 37.4%, which is significantly lower than that of the host (about 50% GC). Genome analysis of the phage revealed 194 putative open reading frames (94.4% of the genome consists of a coding region), with 26 oriented in a forward orientation and 168 in a reverse orientation, and two tRNA genes were identified. Based on BLAST results, functions were assigned to 95 of the genes; most of the annotated genes (98 genes) were hypothetical proteins, probably due to the enormous diversity of bacteriophages and the insufficient database information about the functional genes of phage. Only one gene product is hypothetical novel proteins (Additional file 2: Table S2). The distribution of the ORFs into COG functional categories is provided in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Totala
Genome size (bp)121,442100.00
DNA coding (bp)114,64294.40
DNA G + C (bp)45,41937.40
DNA scaffolds1100.00
Total genes196100.00
Protein coding genes19498.98
RNA genes21.02
Pseudo genes00.00
Genes in internal clusters00.00
Genes with function prediction9548.47
Genes assigned to COGs14875.51
Genes with Pfam domains6231.96
Genes with signal peptides52.57
Genes with transmembrane helices157.73
CRISPR repeats00.00

aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue% of Totala Description
J52.55Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.51RNA processing and modification
K31.53Transcription
L178.67Replication, recombination and repair
B00.00Chromatin structure and dynamics
D21.02Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V00.00Defense mechanisms
T63.06Signal transduction mechanisms
M00.00Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N00.00Cell motility
U00.00Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O63.06Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C00.00Energy production and conversion
G00.00Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E126.12Amino acid transport and metabolism
F115.61Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H52.55Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I00.00Lipid transport and metabolism
P00.00Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q00.00Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R2010.20General function prediction only
S6030.61Function unknown
-4824.48Not in COGs

aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Genome statistics aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

The results of BLAST revealed that the genome of phage phiE142 has a high similarity (query coverage, 94%; identity, 97%) with coliphage vB_EcoM_PhAPEC2, which belong to the Tevenvirinae subfamily of the genus T4-like viruses, an observation that is consistent with the analysis of the DNA polymerase. We therefore concluded that phiE142, based on sequence similarity, belong to the Tevenvirinae subfamily. However, some differences in genome organization were observed, because progressive Mauve genome alignment revealed one colinear block that is in the different order in both bacteriophages (Additional file 3: Figure S3). The principle region of genomic dissimilarity was located between 110,000 pb and 121,000 pb, this region includes a set of ORFs found to be associated with phage-host recognition, suggesting specific features of phage evolution. The phiE142 genome is functionally organized into four modules containing gene clusters for virion morphogenesis, DNA replication/regulation, DNA packaging, and host cell lysis. This modular organization of the genome is typical of bacteriophages. Thirty-one ORFs were found to encode proteins involved in the morphogenesis of virions. These include the ORFs 1–3, 170, 172, 175–185, and 187–194, which are proposed to be genes encoding the components of the tail fiber and baseplate. Databases homology searches suggested that ORFs encoding capsid protein are 46, 139, 142, and 174. Additionally, the proteins encoded by ORFs 185 and 186 are most similar in its amino acid sequence to neck protein. Overall, a total of 46 ORFs are associated with processing of the viral DNA. Our analysis of the phage genomes reveals several genes potentially involved in nucleotide metabolism, including ORFs 14–15, 38–39, 47, 64, 70, 96, 100–101, 125, and 171. In addition, genes that encode proteins involved in replication and transcription of its own DNA were identified in ORFs 5, 7, 12–13, 18, 20–21, 24–25, 28–29, 32, 34–35, 37, 49, 56, 59, 61, 66, 71, 73–76, 78, 81, 86, 102, 106, 130, 132, 141, 144, and 173. Two ORFs exhibit similarity to a gene involved in the host cell lysis, including endolysin and holin. The protein encoded by ORF 143 displays a high degree of identity with the endolysin. This ORF contained one glycohydrolase domain (hydrolyse the beta-1,4-glycosidic bond between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine), which indicates that this protein is probably an enzyme that degrades peptidoglycan. While the putative protein of ORF 4 was identified as a holin protein. Unusually, this ORF is not located adjacent to the endolysin ORF, in most genomes bacteriophages, the holin ORF is adjacent or overlaps a ORF encoding an endolysin. The deduced holin encoded by phiE142 phage has one putative transmembrane domain, and thus resembles class III holins. The phage lifestyle prediction result of PHACTS indicated that the phiE142 is a virulent phage, consistent with the results of genomic analysis, which revealed the absence of genes associated with the establishment and maintenance of lysogenic cycle. The DNA packaging module includes ORF 60, which encode the putative portal protein. However, it was not possible to identify the terminase subunits.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that phiE142 is a member of T4-like virus genus of the Myoviridae family and the Tevenvirinae subfamily. Interestingly, in silico analyses of phiE142 genome did not exhibit homology to known virulence-associated genes, genes involved in lysogeny nor to antibiotic resistance genes or potential immunoreactive allergens. These results indicate that phage phiE142 exhibits genetics properties suitable for evaluation as a biocontrol agent.
  23 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Application of bacteriophages for detection and control of foodborne pathogens.

Authors:  Steven Hagens; Martin J Loessner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Phage classification and characterization.

Authors:  Hans-W Ackermann
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

4.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting Salmonella spp.

Authors:  Gwyneth V Carey-Smith; Craig Billington; Angela J Cornelius; J Andrew Hudson; Jack A Heinemann
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 6.  The global burden of foodborne parasitic diseases: an update.

Authors:  Paul R Torgerson; Nilanthi R de Silva; Eric M Fèvre; Fumiko Kasuga; Mohammad B Rokni; Xiao-Nong Zhou; Banchob Sripa; Neyla Gargouri; Arve Lee Willingham; Claudia Stein
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2013-12-03

7.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors.

Authors:  Lihong Chen; Zhaohui Xiong; Lilian Sun; Jian Yang; Qi Jin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  InterProScan: protein domains identifier.

Authors:  E Quevillon; V Silventoinen; S Pillai; N Harte; N Mulder; R Apweiler; R Lopez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genotypic analyses of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 and non-O157 recovered from feces of domestic animals on rural farms in Mexico.

Authors:  Bianca A Amézquita-López; Beatriz Quiñones; Michael B Cooley; Josefina León-Félix; Nohelia Castro-del Campo; Robert E Mandrell; Maribel Jiménez; Cristóbal Chaidez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Isolation, Characterisation and Complete Genome Sequence of a Tequatrovirus Phage, Escherichia phage KIT03, Which Simultaneously Infects Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Nguyen Huan Pham-Khanh; Hirofumi Sunahara; Hanako Yamadeya; Miho Sakai; Tetsuya Nakayama; Hiromi Yamamoto; Van Truong Thi Bich; Kazuhiko Miyanaga; Kaeko Kamei
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Isolation and identification of Salmonella pullorum bacteriophage YSP2 and its use as a therapy for chicken diarrhea.

Authors:  Kunyuan Tie; Yuyu Yuan; Shiqing Yan; Xi Yu; Qiuyang Zhang; Huihui Xu; Yang Zhang; Jingmin Gu; Changjiang Sun; Liancheng Lei; Wenyu Han; Xin Feng
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  Investigation of Phages Infecting Escherichia coli Strains B and C, and Enterobacter cloacae in Sewage and Ebrié Lagoon, Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Ameyo Yayra Audrey Addablah; Solange Kakou-Ngazoa; Eric Essoh Akpa; Fred M'Bourou Ndombi; Emmanuella Adioumani; Aristide Koudou; David Coulibaly N'Golo; Mireille Kouame Sina; Stephane Kan Kouassi; Serge Aoussi; Mireille Dosso
Journal:  Phage (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-09-17

Review 4.  How Broad Is Enough: The Host Range of Bacteriophages and Its Impact on the Agri-Food Sector.

Authors:  Karen Fong; Catherine W Y Wong; Siyun Wang; Pascal Delaquis
Journal:  Phage (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-06-16

5.  Riding the wave of genomics to investigate aquatic coliphage diversity and activity.

Authors:  Slawomir Michniewski; Tamsin Redgwell; Aurelija Grigonyte; Branko Rihtman; Maria Aguilo-Ferretjans; Joseph Christie-Oleza; Eleanor Jameson; David J Scanlan; Andrew D Millard
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.491

6.  The complete genome and comparative analysis of the phage phiC120 infecting multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella strains.

Authors:  Luis Amarillas; Claudia Villicaña; Luis Lightbourn-Rojas; Arturo González-Robles; Josefina León-Félix
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 7.  Biocontrol Approaches against Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Foods.

Authors:  Pradeep Puligundla; Seokwon Lim
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-05

8.  Bacteriophage cocktail for biocontrol of Escherichia coli O157:H7: Stability and potential allergenicity study.

Authors:  Karina Ramirez; Carmina Cazarez-Montoya; Hector Samuel Lopez-Moreno; Nohelia Castro-Del Campo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Novel Polyvalent Bacteriophage vB_EcoM_swi3 Infects Pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis.

Authors:  Bingrui Sui; Lili Han; Huiying Ren; Wenhua Liu; Can Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.