Background: Anxiety is prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Screening measures are used to identify symptoms of anxiety, but the optimal measure to screen for anxiety disorders in MS has not been established. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES Full Text, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from database inception until August 7, 2015. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full-text reports for study inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We included studies that evaluated the criterion validity of anxiety screening tools when measuring anxiety in individuals with well-documented MS, as measured by sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results: Of the 3181 abstracts screened, 18 articles were reviewed in full text, of which 4 met the inclusion criteria. The criterion validity of three screening tools was assessed: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The HADS-A was validated against the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) interview, and the BAI. The BAI was validated against the SCAN, and the GAD-7 was validated against the HADS-A. The HADS-A had higher measures of sensitivity and specificity than did the BAI and the GAD-7. Conclusions: Based on this small sample, the HADS-A shows promise as an applicable measure for people with MS. Screening scales used to identify anxiety in MS must be validated against appropriate reference standards.
Background: Anxiety is prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Screening measures are used to identify symptoms of anxiety, but the optimal measure to screen for anxiety disorders in MS has not been established. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES Full Text, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from database inception until August 7, 2015. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full-text reports for study inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We included studies that evaluated the criterion validity of anxiety screening tools when measuring anxiety in individuals with well-documented MS, as measured by sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results: Of the 3181 abstracts screened, 18 articles were reviewed in full text, of which 4 met the inclusion criteria. The criterion validity of three screening tools was assessed: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The HADS-A was validated against the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) interview, and the BAI. The BAI was validated against the SCAN, and the GAD-7 was validated against the HADS-A. The HADS-A had higher measures of sensitivity and specificity than did the BAI and the GAD-7. Conclusions: Based on this small sample, the HADS-A shows promise as an applicable measure for people with MS. Screening scales used to identify anxiety in MS must be validated against appropriate reference standards.
Authors: K M Fiest; J R Walker; C N Bernstein; L A Graff; R Zarychanski; A M Abou-Setta; S B Patten; J Sareen; J M Bolton; J J Marriott; J D Fisk; A Singer; R A Marrie Journal: Mult Scler Relat Disord Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan J Deeks; Constantine Gatsonis; Patrick M M Bossuyt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kirsten Sjonnesen; Sandy Berzins; Kirsten M Fiest; Andrew G M Bulloch; Luanne M Metz; Brett D Thombs; Scott B Patten Journal: Postgrad Med Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Bernd Löwe; Oliver Decker; Stefanie Müller; Elmar Brähler; Dieter Schellberg; Wolfgang Herzog; Philipp Yorck Herzberg Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: G Johnson; P W Burvill; C S Anderson; K Jamrozik; E G Stewart-Wynne; T M Chakera Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Ana Jerković; Ana Proroković; Meri Matijaca; Jelena Vuko; Ana Poljičanin; Angela Mastelić; Ana Ćurković Katić; Vana Košta; Lea Kustura; Krešimir Dolić; Zoran Ðogaš; Maja Rogić Vidaković Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-11-30
Authors: Barbara Seebacher; Birgit Helmlinger; Daniela Pinter; Rainer Ehling; Harald Hegen; Stefan Ropele; Gernot Reishofer; Christian Enzinger; Christian Brenneis; Florian Deisenhammer Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Aleksandra Nikolovski; Lara Gamgoum; Arshpreet Deol; Shea Quilichini; Ethan Kazemir; Jonathan Rhodenizer; Ana Oliveira; Dina Brooks; Sanaa Alsubheen Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-09-22
Authors: Ruth Ann Marrie; Lesley Graff; John R Walker; John D Fisk; Scott B Patten; Carol A Hitchon; Lisa M Lix; James Bolton; Jitender Sareen; Alan Katz; Lindsay I Berrigan; James J Marriott; Alexander Singer; Renée El-Gabalawy; Christine A Peschken; Ryan Zarychanski; Charles N Bernstein Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-01-17