| Literature DB >> 27999453 |
Adriana Antônia da Cruz Furini1, Gustavo Capatti Cassiano2, Marcela Petrolini Capobianco3, Sidney Emanuel Batista Dos Santos4, Ricardo Luiz Dantas Machado5.
Abstract
Polymorphisms in cytokine genes can alter the production of these proteins and consequently affect the immune response. The trihybrid heterogeneity of the Brazilian population is characterized as a condition for the use of ancestry informative markers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of -1031T>C, -308G>A and -238G>A TNFA, +874 A>T IFNG and -819C>T, and -592C>A IL10 gene polymorphisms and their association with malaria vivax and genomic ancestry. Samples from 90 vivax malaria-infected individuals and 51 noninfected individuals from northern Brazil were evaluated. Genotyping was carried out by using ASO-PCR or PCR/RFLP. The genomic ancestry of the individuals was classified using 48 insertion/deletion polymorphism biallelic markers. There were no differences in the proportions of African, European, and Native American ancestry between men and women. No significant association was observed for the allele and genotype frequencies of the 6 SNPs between malaria-infected and noninfected individuals. However, there was a trend toward decreasing the frequency of individuals carrying the TNF-308A allele with the increasing proportion of European ancestry. No ethnic-specific SNPs were identified, and there was no allelic or genotype association with susceptibility or resistance to vivax malaria. Understanding the genomic mechanisms by which ancestry influences this association is critical and requires further study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27999453 PMCID: PMC5143728 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5168363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Characteristics of the study population.
| Characteristic | Mild | Noninfected ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, malea | 74.4 | 56.9 | 0.03 |
| Age (years)b | 32.5 (23.75–43.5) | 37.0 (26.0–45.0) | 0.62 |
| Genetic ancestryc | |||
| European | 0.442 ± 0.130 | 0.449 ± 0.130 | 0.76 |
| African | 0.318 ± 0.120 | 0.295 ± 0.112 | 0.26 |
| Native American | 0.240 ± 0.094 | 0.256 ± 0.111 | 0.35 |
| Previous malaria episodesb | 5.0 (2.0–7.0) | 2.0 (0–6.0) | 0.06 |
| Previous history of malariaa | 91.1 | 68.6 | <0.01 |
aPercentage.
bMedian (IQR).
cMean ± SD.
Distribution of the genotypes between vivax malaria-infected and noninfected individuals.
| Gene | SNP | Genotype | Malaria | Noninfected |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| MAF | HWE |
| MAF | HWE | ||||
|
|
|
| 39 (48.7) | 0.30 | 0.91 | 17 (34.0) | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.22 |
|
| 34 (42.5) | 29 (58.0) | |||||||
|
| 7 (8.8) | 4 (8.0) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| 51 (56.7) | 0.28 | 0.11 | 24 (47.1) | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.53 |
|
| 37 (41.1) | 25 (49.0) | |||||||
|
| 2 (2.2) | 2 (3.9) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| 69 (76.7) | 0.12 | 0.21 | 35 (68.7) | 0.18 | 0.69 | 0.14 |
|
| 21 (23.3) | 14 (27.4) | |||||||
|
| 0 | 2 (3.9) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| 80 (88.9) | 0.06 | 0.22 | 46 (90.2) | 0.05 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
|
| 9 (10.0) | 5 (9.8) | |||||||
|
| 1 (1.1) | 0 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| 39 (43.3) | 0.34 | 0.87 | 19 (37.2) | 0.35 | 0.15 | 0.55 |
|
| 41 (45.6) | 28 (54.9) | |||||||
|
| 10 (11.1) | 4 (7.8) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| 41 (45.6) | 0.29 | 0.05 | 20 (39.2) | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.62 |
|
| 45 (50.0) | 27 (52.9) | |||||||
|
| 4 (4.4) | 4 (7.8) | |||||||
MAF: minor allele frequency; HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
p values were calculated from a chi-squared test.
Haplotype frequencies in the TNF and IL10 genes in vivax malaria-infected and noninfected individuals.
| Haplotype | Malaria | Noninfected | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| T/G/G | 0.632 | 0.555 | Reference | 0.11 |
| C/G/G | 0.195 | 0.220 | 0.63 (0.30–1.31) | 0.45 |
| T/A/G | 0.113 | 0.161 | 0.48 (0.20–1.13) | 0.17 |
| C/G/A | 0.037 | 0.049 | 0.62 (0.15–2.35) | 0.75 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| C/C | 0.642 | 0.647 | Reference | 0.94 |
| T/A | 0.291 | 0.343 | 0.80 (0.44–1.44) | 0.33 |
| T/C | 0.054 | 0.009 | 7.19 (0.89–57.7) | 0.06 |
Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI).
Haplotype frequency and its association with the proportions of African, European, and Native American ancestry.
| Haplotype | Frequency | African | European | Native American | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion | Difference (95% CI) |
| Proportion | Difference (95% CI) |
| Proportion | Difference (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| ||||||||||
| T/G/G | 0.615 | 0.31 | Reference | 0.44 | Reference | 0.25 | Reference | |||
| C/G/G | 0.191 | −0.01 (−0.05–0.03) | 0.61 | −0.01 (−0.06–0.03) | 0.57 | 0.01 (−0.02–0.05) | 0.49 | |||
| T/A/G | 0.121 | −0.05 (−0.10–0.00) | 0.05 | 0.06 (0.00–0.11) | 0.05 | −0.02 (−0.06–0.02) | 0.37 | |||
| C/G/A | 0.044 | −0.01 (−0.08–0.06) | 0.78 | −0.02 (−0.11–0.06) | 0.55 | 0.06 (−0.03–0.15) | 0.17 | |||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| C/C | 0.650 | 0.30 | Reference | 0.45 | Reference | 0.25 | Reference | |||
| T/A | 0.303 | −0.01 (−0.04–0.03) | 0.67 | 0.00 (−0.04–0.04) | 0.94 | 0.01 (−0.02–0.04) | 0.55 | |||
| T/C | 0.040 | 0.01 (−0.07–0.08) | 0.86 | −0.02 (−0.10–0.06) | 0.60 | 0.02 (−0.05–0.08) | 0.63 | |||
The effects of each haplotype were relative to the most frequent haplotype used as a reference. Δ% indicates relative change in the ancestry proportions compared to the reference haplotypes with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 1Binary logistic regression model used to evaluate the frequency of individuals carrying the mutant allele of all analyzed SNPs relative to the individual proportions of genetic ancestry. The shading around the lines represents the 95% confidence interval. The graph was constructed using the ggplot2 package in the R program.