Literature DB >> 27999423

Characterization of community-associated Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft-tissue infections: a multicenter study in China.

Ying Liu1, Zhe Xu1, Zhou Yang1, Juan Sun1, Lin Ma1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the epidemiological and molecular features of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) from children and adult patients with skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) in China. Prospective community-acquired S. aureus SSTI surveillance was conducted in 23 hospitals over a 24-month period. Susceptibility to 16 antimicrobials was evaluated using the agar dilution method. StatApriori was used to determine statistically significant association trends. The genotypic characteristics of CA-MRSA isolates were tested by staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing, and multilocus sequence typing. The presence of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl) genes was determined. Overall, 71.6% (1946/2716) of cases were community-associated S. aureus. CA-MRSA accounted for 2.6% (51). Out of 1895 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus strains, 97.3% were resistant to erythromycin, 96.6% to penicillin and 89.1% to clindamycin. No S. aureus strains were resistant to vancomycin. Thirteen sequence types (STs) and 17 spa types were detected among the CA-MRSA strains. The most prevalent sequence type was ST121 (19/51, 37.3%), followed by ST59 (13/51, 25.5%). In addition, t437 was predominant, accounting for 43.1% (22/51). Only five (9.8%) of the CA-MRSA strains harbored pvl genes. There were no significant differences in antibiotic sensitivity profiles between ST121 and non-ST121 MRSA isolates. However, ST121 strains tended to be more resistant to cefazolin, whereas non-ST121 strains were more resistant to chloramphenicol. In conclusion, CA-MRSA infections are rare among Chinese SSTI patients. MRSA strains in China have diverse genetic backgrounds, with ST121 being the predominant clone. Fusidic acid and mupirocin remain effective for topical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27999423      PMCID: PMC5180372          DOI: 10.1038/emi.2016.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect        ISSN: 2222-1751            Impact factor:   7.163


INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a significant human pathogen worldwide, particularly in healthcare settings. It has long been recognized as an important causative agent of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs), which range from folliculitis to life-threatening conditions such as necrotizing fasciitis. The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and its ability to resist multiple drugs has posed a serious challenge.[1] Hospital-associated MRSA has been extensively investigated, with a high prevalence of MRSA (52.3%–76.9%) in mainland China.[2] However, considering China's vast territory, the data on SSTIs caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) are limited. Despite the importance of MRSA, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) is among the most common causative agents of SSTIs.[3] The epidemiological surveillance of MRSA and MSSA is critical for the development and implementation of infection control programs. This study focused on an expanded sample of SSTI cases to obtain accurate molecular characteristics of CA-MRSA in mainland China and to produce a more comprehensive national description of the molecular epidemiology and resistance profiles of CA-MRSA in children and adults in China. Although previous studies reported on S. aureus biogeography and virulence,[4] to our knowledge, this is the first study to compare contemporaneous CA-MRSA of SSTIs from adults and children and the first such study carried out in mainland China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient enrollment

This was a laboratory-based multicenter study involving the voluntary participation of 23 hospitals (including 13 children's hospitals and ten adult hospitals) in six geographical regions (Northeast, North China, Northwest, East China, South Central China and Southwest) located throughout China. The inclusion criteria for these institutions were: (i) at least one children's hospital and one adult hospital located in five regions, but only one children's hospital in the Northeast area; and (ii) certified as a rank A tertiary hospital by the Ministry of Health of China. Clinical data were collected from outpatients with SSTIs in the Department of Dermatology of each hospital during a 24-month period from October 2009 to September 2011.

Clinical data collection

Eligible patients were those with at least one sample from any site that was culture positive for S. aureus who met the following criteria for community-associated S. aureus: (i) a culture sample was obtained during an outpatient visit or within 48 h of hospitalization; (ii) the patient had not been admitted to a hospital, nursing home or any other long-term care facility within the past year; and (iii) the patient had no history within the past year of known risk factors for MRSA, including current intravenous drug use, surgery, dialysis, an indwelling catheter or a percutaneous medical device. A case report form was completed for each patient who included demographic information, clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, type of infection diagnosed, all antibiotic use and clinical outcome.

Bacterial strains

Specimens were collected from infection sites of every patient enrolled and cultured on blood agar. Preliminary identification was performed based on bacterial morphology, Gram staining, hemolysis, and catalase tests at the central laboratory. Then, Slidex Staph Plus (bioMérieux, Marcy I'Etoile, France) latex agglutination was performed for the rapid detection of S. aureus. To avoid overrepresentation, we included only the first isolate from each patient. MRSA isolates were initially identified using the oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentration method and confirmed for the presence of the mecA gene by PCR as previously described.[5]

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The minimum inhibitory concentrations of penicillin, oxacillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, rifampicin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin, fusidic acid and mupirocin were determined by agar dilution method in accordance with the 2010 guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes.[6] All antibiotics were from Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA except mupirocin from GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, London. Fusidic acid minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined according to the European Committee on Susceptibility Testing guidelines (EUCAST, version 1.3, 2010, Basel, Switzerland). The S. aureus strain ATCC 29213 was used as a control.

Molecular typing methods

Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing, and multilocus sequence typing were performed using PCR as previously described for all CA-MRSA isolates.[5, 7, 8] The presence of Panton–Valentine leukocidin (pvl) genes, such as lukS-PV and lukF-PV, was also determined by PCR as previously described.[9]

Statistical analysis

A χ2-test or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze quantitative variables. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 13.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. All susceptibility data and molecular test results were analyzed using WHONET software, version 5.6. StatApriori (WHO, Geneva, Switzerland) was used for searching statistically significant association rules.

RESULTS

Patient demographics

A total of 2716 patients were identified during the study period. Out of these patients, 71.6% (1946) fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study, 2.6% (51) met the definition of CA-MRSA infection and the rest were classified as having MSSA infection. The incidence of S. aureus from children's hospitals (82.6%, 1705/2046) was much higher than from adult hospitals (36.96%, 241/652). Common lesions in children included impetigo (81.9%, 1397/1705), staphylococcal scald skin syndrome (4.8%, 82/1705), and secondary infection of eczema (4.3%, 74/1705), whereas in adults, common lesions included secondary infection of eczema (24%, 58/241), impetigo (20%, 48/241) and folliculitis (11%, 27/241). Demographic and clinical features of all patients are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical features of patients from children and adults with skin and soft-tissue infections

VariablesChildrenAdults
General information
 Total patients (n)2046670
 Male to female ratio1.25:11.24:1
 Age (mean±SD, years)3.69±2.6729.43±22.25
 Range1 d to 18 y19–93 y
 MSSA (n)1705241
 MRSA (n)447
 
Types of skin and soft-tissue infection (n) (SA/MRSA)
 Diseases
  Impetigo1397/2848/1
  SSSS82/20/0
  Secondary infection of eczema74/258/1
  Abscess28/513/3
  Secondary infection of urticaria-like papules27/00/0
  Folliculitis21/127/0
  Furuncle10/114/1
  Cellulitis9/22/0
  Paronychia4/10/0
  Trauma4/08/1
  Omphalitis2/10/0
  Necrotizing fasciitis1/00/0
  Other secondary infections46/171/0
RegionHospital(n) (patient/SA/MRSA)
Source and distribution of patients
 NortheastHBCH187/142/6
 CCCH23/10/2
 DLCH9/8/0
 North ChinaPPH35/8/0
 PTH30/11/0
 PFH71/28/2
 BJCH826/787/9
 SXCH90/69/1
 TJCH5/5/0
 East ChinaHSH18/6/0
 XZCH204/163/2
 FDPH35/26/1
 NorthwestXJH94/34/1
 UFH89/52/1
 XJFH50/33/1
 SouthwestWCH90/17/1
 SWH94/46/0
 CQCH116/102/9
 South Central ChinaWHH66/11/1
 XYH83/28/1
 ZZCH196/153/3
 HNCH131/82/2
 GZCC174/125/8

Abbreviations: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA; methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, MSSA; Staphylococcus aureus, SA.

Three letter abbreviations for adult's hospital and four letter abbreviations for children's hospital: Beijing Children's Hospital, BJCH; Children's Hospital of Changchun, CCCH; Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, CQCH; Dalian Children's Hospital of Dalian Medical University, DLCH; The Paediatric Hospital of Fudan University, FDPH; Harbin Children's Hospital, HBCH; Hunan Children's Hospital, HNCH; Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, HSH; Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, GZCC; Peking University First Hospital, PFH; Peking University; People's Hospital, PPH; Peking University Third Hospital, PTH; The First People's Hospital of Urumqi, UFH; Southwest Hospital, SWH; Children's Hospital of Shanxi, SXCH; Tianjin Children's Hospital, TJCH; West China Hospital, WCH; Wuhan No.1 Hospital, WHH; The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, XJFH; Xijing Hospital, XJH; The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, XYH; Xuzhou Children's Hospital, XZCH; Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, ZZCH.

Comparison of resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates

Overall, CA-MRSA accounted for 2.6% (51) of 1946 S. aureus strains. Of 1895 MSSA strains isolated, 97.3% strains were resistant to erythromycin, followed by 96.6% to penicillin, 89.1% to clindamycin, 42.0% to tetracycline and 14.4% to chloramphenicol. None of the S. aureus strains were resistant to vancomycin. The antimicrobial susceptibilities of MRSA isolates were compared with MSSA isolates (Table 2). CA-MRSA isolates demonstrated a higher rate of resistance to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone and cefixime (31.4% vs. 14.4%, 13.7% vs. 6.3%, 23.5% vs. 0.9% and 19.6% vs. 2.5%, respectively). The susceptibility profiles of MRSA to other antimicrobial agents were similar to those of MSSA. All CA-MRSA and MSSA isolates tested were sensitive to vancomycin. Significant differences in antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of isolates from children and adults were also observed (P<0.05) (Table 2). S. aureus isolates obtained from children were more likely to be susceptible to chloramphenicol, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fusidic acid, mupirocin and cephalosporin than those from adults.
Table 2

Results of the susceptibility testing of the strains

AgentsChildren (n=1705)Adults (n=241)PMRSA (n=51)MSSA (n=1895)P
 %R%R %R%R 
Penicillin G96.887.9P≤0.0510096.60.412
Erythromycin96.886.6P≤0.059897.31
Clindamycin89.370.7P≤0.0586.389.10.528
Tetracycline38.831.80.04149420.317
Chloramphenicol15.124.8P≤0.0531.414.4P≤0.05
Gentamicin9.629.3P≤0.055.99.90.339
Ciprofloxacin6.220.4P≤0.0513.76.3P≤0.05
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole3.67.60.0047.84.50.291
Oxacillin2.61.90.6391000/
Fusidic acid1.87P≤0.0501.41
Rifampin1.72.70.1943.92.40.351
Cefazolin1.46.4P≤0.053.91.60.204
Mupirocin1.35.8P≤0.053.90.70.057
Ceftriaxone1.14.5P≤0.0523.50.9P≤0.05
Cefixime0.55.7P≤0.0519.62.5P≤0.05
Vancomycin00/00/

Abbreviations: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA; methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, MSSA.

Molecular characteristics of CA-MRSA isolates

High genetic diversity was observed among the 51 CA-MRSA isolates: 13 STs and 17 spa types harbored two SCCmec types (Table 3). Surprisingly, the most prevalent ST was ST121 (19/51, 37.3%), followed by ST59 (13/51, 25.5%). Among them, t437 was predominant, which accounted for 43.1% (22/51) of all CA-MRSA isolates, followed by t2086, t1425 and t127. Only SCCmec type IV was found in North China. Interestingly, strains ST121, ST59 and t437 were uncommon in East China. Some spatial variations were observed in the distribution of spa types (e.g., t437 occurred in 66.7% and 55.6% isolates from Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and Beijing Children's Hospital, respectively). However, such differences were not significant. No other clinical or spatial associations were observed in the distribution of spa types or STs with regard to infection type, sex, region or hospital of origin.
Table 3

Clinical and molecular features of 51 cases with CA-MRSA infections

NumberCaseHospitalInfectionMLSTSPASCCmecPVL
1XZ40AXZCHImpetigost1t127V
2C490BJCHImpetigost121t1425IV
3C668BJCHImpetigost121t2086IV
4C958BJCHImpetigost121t2086V
5C732BJCHImpetigost121t437V
6C1243BJCHImpetigost338t437V
7C871BJCHImpetigost448t1425IV
8C867BJCHParonychiast59t437IV
9C1252BJCHImpetigost59t437V
10C152BJCHImpetigost59t437IV
11CC18CCCHImpetigost121t2019IV
12CC16CCCHImpetigost573t1839V
13CCH40CQCHImpetigost121t1425V
14CCH42CQCHImpetigost211t437V
15CCH115CQCHAbscessst45t2086V
16CCH184CQCHAbscessst59t437IV
17CCH229CQCHImpetigost59t437V
18CCH118CQCHAbscessst121t2086IV+
19CCH302CQCHCellulitisst121t437IV+
20CCH193CQCHAbscessst59t437V+
21CCH117CQCHAbscessst121t437IV 
22EK16FDPHImpetigost8t008V
23GCH43GZCCImpetigost121t1425IV
24GCH36GZCCImpetigost121t2086IV
25GCH291GZCCImpetigost121t269IV
26GCH92GZCCImpetigost121t375V
27GCH268GZCCImpetigost121t8660V
28GCH52GZCCSecondary infection of herpes simplexst338t437V
29GCH101GZCCSSSSst448t437IV
30GCH35GZCCFurunclest338t437V+
31HCH37CHBCHImpetigost121t127IV
32HCH249HBCHSecondary infection of eczemast121t2086V
33HCH233HBCHSecondary infection of eczemast121t437V
34HCH68CHBCHImpetigost211t1425V
35HCH23HBCHImpetigost59t437IV
36HCH65CHBCHImpetigost59t437V
37HN104HNCHOmphalitisst19t30V
38HN133HNCHCellulitisst20t2919V 
39BHC108PFHImpetigost88t7637IV
40BHC123PFHAbscessst59t437IV+
41SX75SXCHImpetigost121t2086IV
42XJC41UFHImpetigost59t437IV
43CDL13WCHTraumast1t127IV
44WH54WHHAbscessst59t437IV
45XJH31XJFHFurunclest59t437IV
46XJ74XJHSecondary infection of eczemast121t114IV
47XYH34XYHAbscessst59t437V
48XZ107XZCHFolliculitisst88t325IV
49ZCH13CZZCHImpetigost1t127V
50ZCH03ZZCHImpetigost1t1784IV
51ZCH18AZZCHSSSSst93t202V

Abbreviations: community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, CA-MRSA; multilocus sequence typing, MLST; panton-valentine leukocidin, PVL; Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, SCCmec; staphylococcal protein A, SPA.

Of the isolates tested, only five (9.8%) of the CA-MRSA isolates harbored pvl genes. Four of the strains were isolated from children. Three patients suffered from abscesses, one from a furuncle and one from cellulitis. Four of the strains were t437. The clinical and molecular characteristics of the five CA-MRSA isolates are shown in Table 3.

Characteristics of ST121 CA-MRSA strains

The 19 ST121 strains were isolated from patients with impetigo (13/19), cellulitis (1/19), secondary infection of eczema (3/19) and abscess (2/19). These 19 strains comprised nine spa types; however, only t437 was found in ST59 strains. There was no significant difference in antibiotic sensitivities between ST121 and non-ST121 MRSA isolates. Thirty-six separate associations between the five antimicrobials (erythromycin, penicillin, tetracycline, clindamycin and cefazolin/chloramphenicol) were found. Moreover, ST121 CA-MRSA strains tended to be more resistant to cefazolin, whereas non-ST121 CA-MRSA strains tended to be more resistant to chloramphenicol (Figure 1). Two mupirocin-resistant strains were observed among non-ST121 CA-MRSA strains.
Figure 1

The association rule showed that there were 36 associations between the five antimicrobials in ST121 (A) and non-ST121 (B) CA-MRSA strains. Chloramphenicol, CHL; clindamycin, CLI; cefazolin, CZO; erythromycin, ERY; penicillin, PEN; tetracycline, TCY.

DISCUSSION

This study was conducted at 23 large, inner city, comprehensive medical teaching and research hospitals selected by the Chinese Ministry of Health to fill an important gap in the knowledge of community-associated S. aureus SSTIs in China. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale comparison of CA-MRSA clinical characteristics between children and adults with S. aureus SSTIs in mainland China. We present three major findings: (i) the prevalence of CA-MRSA was low among children and adults with SSTIs; (ii) CA-MRSA strains in China have diverse genetic backgrounds and there is no trend of an outbreak thus far; and (iii) ST121 is currently the predominant clone. The prevalence of CA-MRSA varies geographically, with a detection rate in patients with skin infections of 1–3% in France and up to 50% in the United States.[10] The incidence of CA-MRSA SSTIs in China is unclear because of the lack of systematic epidemiological studies. A few small studies demonstrated that the incidence of CA-MRSA with SSTIs was 1.1–4% in Beijing and other regions of China.[11, 12] In this study, we found the prevalence of CA-MRSA SSTIs to be surprisingly low, from 1.3% in North China to 6.1% in Southwest China. Furthermore, no MRSA infections were observed at two children's hospitals and four adult hospitals. A potential explanation for the differences in the prevalence of MRSA infections in distinct regions of China is most likely the vast size of the territories, along with disparities in economic development. Another explanation may be a data bias of fewer cases in these regions. The current absence of CA-MRSA outbreaks or reports on serious outcomes of CA-MRSA infections suggests that the low prevalence observed in this study may truly reflect the current situation in China. Antibiogram testing is a crucial step in MRSA screening and selection of the appropriate antibiotic for proper treatment of skin infections. Our study showed that most patients had MSSA (1 964/2 716 patients). On comparing the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates from children and adults, significant differences were found. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns therefore appear to depend mainly on bacterial strains, rather than type of skin infections. The majority of patients with SSTIs can be cured only using topical antibiotics; however, a small number of patients require systematic treatment. According to the results of antibiotic susceptibility tests in this study, penicillin and erythromycin are no longer appropriate agents, and cephalosporin may be the wiser choice. Although MRSA are generally resistant to all previously available beta-lactams, it was interesting that cephalosporin demonstrated potent activity against CA-MRSA. Indeed, traditional antistaphylococcal antibiotics (cephalosporin) have been associated with good clinical outcomes for CA-MRSA SSTIs. Recently, ceftaroline, which is a novel parenteral broad-spectrum cephalosporin, demonstrated bactericidal activity against Gram-positive organisms (including MRSA) and represented a bactericidal option for the treatment of MRSA infections, including those caused by isolates with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and daptomycin.[13] Fusidic acid and mupirocin are effective topical antibacterial agents for the management of skin infections and S. aureus colonization in both patients and healthcare workers. In the past decade, there has been an increase in fusidic acid resistance in a number of countries. However, the fusidic acid resistance rates between MSSA and MRSA may differ. From 1998 to 2001, data from the United Kingdom showed that the resistance rates for fusidic acid in MSSA increased from 6.0% to 11.5%, whereas the resistance rates in MRSA were much lower and remained constant at ~2%.[14] In this study, we also found it interesting that only MSSA was resistant to fusidic acid (1.4%). In 1999, fusidic acid was first introduced in China and has been available as a topical cream since 2003. However, resistance to fusidic acid in China was reported after 2007.[15, 16] Therefore, selective pressure from antibiotic use likely led to increased resistance to fusidic acid. Similarly, initial reports on mupirocin-resistant S. aureus emerged shortly after the introduction of mupirocin into clinical practice.[17] However, the prevalence of mupirocin resistance has increased in settings where this agent is used extensively. It has been reported that more than 50% of community-associated S. aureus strains displayed high-level resistance to mupirocin in Canada.[18] In Beijing Children's Hospital, mupirocin ointment has been prescribed since 1993. However, only one strain was found to be resistant to mupirocin in 2005.[15] In this study, the number of mupirocin-resistant S. aureus isolates clearly increased, but remained low compared with rates observed in other countries. Mupirocin therefore remains an effective therapy for the elimination of staphylococci in China. It has been reported that five major CA-MRSA clones are disseminating worldwide. For example, the ST1 clone is observed in Asia, Europe, and the United States; the ST8 clone in Europe and the United States; the ST30 clone in Australia, Europe and South America; the ST59 clone in Asia and the United States; and the ST80 clone in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East.[19] In 2007, Schefold et al.[20] first reported a sepsis case of a 51-year-old male caused by S. aureus ST121. Thereafter, ST121 MSSA isolates were found to be distributed in 15 out of the 19 surveyed countries, namely Paraguay, New Caledonia, Togo, France, Czech Republic, Germany, Turkey, the United States, French West Indies, United Kingdom, Polynesia, Switzerland, Spain, Algeria and The Netherlands.[21] A small study performed in mainland China demonstrated that ~8.3% (1/12) of SSTIs[22] and 30.6% of asymptomatically colonized children in kindergartens[23] were associated with ST121 isolates. These findings suggest that most ST121 strains are MSSA. The ST121 clone is rarely dominant in MRSA clinical infections. It has been reported that 11.8% of MRSA strains belonged to ST121 in Cambodia,[24] 7.1% in Japan,[25] 5.4% in Portugal[26] and 0.3% in Spain.[27] The important finding from the present study is that ST121 (35.3%), which had been previously documented in only two isolates (3.5%) among MRSA causing SSTIs in 2015,[28] was more prevalent than ST59 (25.5%). Moreover, ST121 isolates have disseminated in seven hospitals located in five regions in mainland China. Interestingly, neither ST121 nor ST59 was observed in East China hospitals, an area of relatively rapid economic development. In addition, predominant spa type t437, which comprised 43.2% of all CA-MRSA, was also not observed in East China. There were also no significant differences in antibiotic sensitivities between MRSA and MSSA. MSSA has evolved as MRSA through the acquisition of SCCmec,[29, 30] and therefore, some MSSA genotypes are the same as some popular CA-MRSA genotypes. Baines et al.[31] found that ST5 MRSA clone has emerged from locally circulating ST5 MSSA strains in New Zealand. In addition, Stegger et al.[32] determined that a single descendant of a PVL-positive methicillin-sensitive ancestor circulating in sub-Saharan Africa rose to become the dominant CA-MRSA clone in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The findings in this study indicate that the genetic background of CA-MRSA found in mainland China is complex. We will next probe more deeply into the genotyping of MSSA and expect to find clues of MRSA 'conversion' from MSSA in China. The role of PVL in the pathogenesis of staphylococcal infections remains controversial. However, PVL has been closely associated with CA-MRSA infections, and there is a strong epidemiological association between carriage of pvl genes and successful CA-MRSA lineages. PVL-positive S. aureus strains are more frequently associated with cellulitis and abscesses than with impetigo.[33] Although highly virulent CA-MRSA strains carrying pvl genes are known to prevail worldwide, the prevalence of PVL-positive MRSA strains from SSTIs in China was reported to range from 12.5% to 19.1%.[28, 34] Compared with a previous study, the overall positivity rates of pvl genes in the present study was lower (9.8%), indicating a decreased prevalence of pvl genes among S. aureus SSTI isolates in China. Five patients with PVL-positive CA-MRSA infections were able to perform daily activities and had no identifiable risk factors. All five patients were empirically treated with cephalosporin and good outcomes were achieved. In summary, this study provided information on the epidemiological and molecular characteristics of community-acquired S. aureus SSTIs among Chinese populations. The low prevalence of CA-MRSA is positive news. Interestingly, ST121 was the predominant clone among CA-MRSA strains. Moreover, there were no clear regional variations. To fully understand the epidemiology of S. aureus clone ST121, the continued systematic surveillance of both hospital- and community-associated isolates is required.
  32 in total

1.  Susceptibility to and resistance determinants of fusidic acid in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Chinese children with skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Yingchao Liu; Wenjing Geng; Yonghong Yang; Chuanqing Wang; Yaojie Zheng; Yunxiao Shang; Dejing Wu; Xiangmei Li; Lijuan Wang; Sangjie Yu; Kaihu Yao; Xuzhuang Shen
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-03

2.  Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements.

Authors: 
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of genetic backgrounds of methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Portuguese hospitals and the community.

Authors:  M Aires de Sousa; T Conceição; C Simas; H de Lencastre
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Epidemiological features, resistance genes, and clones among community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CO-MRSA) isolates detected in northern Spain.

Authors:  María González-Domínguez; Cristina Seral; Yolanda Sáenz; Soledad Salvo; María José Gude; Nerea Porres-Osante; Carmen Torres; Francisco Javier Castillo
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Biogeography and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Juan Fan; Min Shu; Ge Zhang; Wei Zhou; Yongmei Jiang; Yu Zhu; Guihua Chen; Sharon J Peacock; Chaomin Wan; Wubin Pan; Edward J Feil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Staphylococcus aureus ST121: a globally disseminated hypervirulent clone.

Authors:  Qing Rao; Weilong Shang; Xiaomei Hu; Xiancai Rao
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus as a predominantly healthcare-associated pathogen: a possible reversal of roles?

Authors:  Michael Z David; Susan Boyle-Vavra; Diana L Zychowski; Robert S Daum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characterization of community acquired Staphylococcus aureus associated with skin and soft tissue infection in Beijing: high prevalence of PVL+ ST398.

Authors:  Chunjiang Zhao; Yingmei Liu; Mingze Zhao; Yali Liu; Yong Yu; Hongbin Chen; Qiuning Sun; Huawei Chen; Wei Jiang; Yudong Liu; Shaomei Han; Yingchun Xu; Minjun Chen; Bin Cao; Hui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Canada.

Authors:  Michael R Mulvey; Laura MacDougall; Brenda Cholin; Greg Horsman; Melanie Fidyk; Shirley Woods
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with pediatric infection in Cambodia.

Authors:  Kheng Chheng; Sarah Tarquinio; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Lina Sin; Janjira Thaipadungpanit; Premjit Amornchai; Ngoun Chanpheaktra; Sarinna Tumapa; Hor Putchhat; Nicholas P J Day; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

1.  Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Skin from Atopic-Dermatitis Patients Produces Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Y, Which Predominantly Induces T-Cell Receptor Vα-Specific Expansion of T Cells.

Authors:  Fatkhanuddin Aziz; Junzo Hisatsune; Liansheng Yu; Junko Kajimura; Yusuke Sato'o; Hisaya K Ono; Kanako Masuda; Mika Yamaoka; Siti Isrina Oktavia Salasia; Akio Nakane; Hiroki Ohge; Yoichiro Kusunoki; Motoyuki Sugai
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Survey of Staphylococcus aureus in a general pediatric population and focus on isolates with three clinically relevant toxin-encoding genes.

Authors:  Anne Filleron; Sarah Beauregard-Birba; Thibault Mura; Fabien Aujoulat; Anne Laure Michon; Michel Rodière; Tu Anh Tran; Eric Jeziorski; Hélène Marchandin
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  Management of superficial and deep-seated Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections in sub-Saharan Africa: a post hoc analysis of the StaphNet cohort.

Authors:  Abraham Alabi; Theckla Kazimoto; Marthe Lebughe; Delfino Vubil; Patrick Phaku; Inacio Mandomando; Winfried V Kern; Salim Abdulla; Alexander Mellmann; Lena Peitzmann; Markus Bischoff; Georg Peters; Mathias Herrmann; Martin P Grobusch; Frieder Schaumburg; Siegbert Rieg
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Clinical and molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Chinese children: association among the agr groups and genotypes, virulence genes and disease types.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Su-Yun Qian; Kai-Hu Yao; Fang Dong; Wen-Qi Song; Chen Sun; Xin Yang; Jing- Hui Zhen; Xi-Qing Liu; Zhi -Yong Lv; Xi Yang
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.764

5.  Dissemination of macrolides, fusidic acid and mupirocin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

Authors:  Xingmei Liu; Shanshan Deng; Jinwei Huang; Yaling Huang; Yu Zhang; Qin Yan; Yanhong Wang; Yanyue Li; Chengfu Sun; Xu Jia
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-22

6.  Comparison of community- and healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates at a Chinese tertiary hospital, 2012-2017.

Authors:  Haiying Peng; Dengtao Liu; Yuhua Ma; Wei Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Women and Children in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Bingshao Liang; Jialiang Mai; Yunfeng Liu; Yanmei Huang; Huamin Zhong; Yongqiang Xie; Qiulian Deng; Lianfen Huang; Shuwen Yao; Yanming He; Yan Long; Yiyu Yang; Sitang Gong; Hongling Yang; Zhenwen Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Molecular typing revealed the emergence of pvl-positive sequence type 22 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Urumqi, Northwestern China.

Authors:  Wenchang Yuan; Jianhua Liu; Youchao Zhan; Li Wang; Yanqiong Jiang; Yanling Zhang; Ning Sun; Ning Hou
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  A novel SigB(Q225P) mutation in Staphylococcus aureus retains virulence but promotes biofilm formation.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Weilong Shang; Zhen Hu; Ying Zheng; Jizhen Yuan; Qiwen Hu; Huagang Peng; Xinyu Cai; Li Tan; Shu Li; Junmin Zhu; Ming Li; Xiaomei Hu; Renjie Zhou; Xiancai Rao; Yi Yang
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 7.163

Review 10.  Prevalence and risk factors of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in Asia-Pacific region from 2000 to 2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Wh Wong; Margaret Ip; Arthur Tang; Vivian Wi Wei; Samuel Ys Wong; Steven Riley; Jonathan M Read; Kin On Kwok
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.