| Literature DB >> 27999340 |
Jiannan Cui1,2, Yongkun Zhao3,4, Hualei Wang5,6, Boning Qiu7, Zengguo Cao8, Qian Li9, Yanbo Zhang3, Feihu Yan10, Hongli Jin11, Tiecheng Wang12,13, Weiyang Sun14,15, Na Feng16,17, Yuwei Gao18,19, Jing Sun20, Yanqun Wang21, Stanley Perlman22, Jincun Zhao23, Songtao Yang24,25, Xianzhu Xia26,27.
Abstract
West Nile virus (WNV) is prevalent in Africa, Europe, the Middle East, West Asia, and North America, and causes epidemic encephalitis. To date, no effective therapy for WNV infection has been developed; therefore, there is urgent need to find an efficient method to prevent WNV disease. In this study, we prepared and evaluated the protective efficacy of immune serum IgG and pepsin-digested F(ab')₂ fragments from horses immunized with the WNV virus-like particles (VLP) expressing the WNV M and E proteins. Immune equine F(ab')₂ fragments and immune horse sera efficiently neutralized WNV infection in tissue culture. The passive transfer of equine immune antibodies significantly accelerated the virus clearance in the spleens and brains of WNV infected mice, and reduced mortality. Thus, equine immunoglobulin or equine neutralizing F(ab')₂ passive immunotherapy is a potential strategy for the prophylactic or therapeutic treatment of patients infected with WNV.Entities:
Keywords: F(ab′)2 fragments; West Nile virus; equine immunoglobulin; mice
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27999340 PMCID: PMC5192393 DOI: 10.3390/v8120332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1ELISA titers of West Nile virus (WNV) EDIII (structural domain III of the E protein)-specific antibody in immunized horse sera. Horses (n = 2, labeled as 21# and 56#) were intramuscularly immunized with WNV-VLP (virus-like particles) and boosted every two weeks for an additional four cycles. The sera were collected 2 weeks after each immunization.
Figure 2Generation and purification of IgG and F(ab′)2. A saturated solution of ammonium sulfate was added to the serum to precipitate the IgG, and F(ab′)2 was generated by digesting the IgG with pepsin followed by Protein-A/G chromatography. (A) SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining of the purified IgG and F(ab′)2; (B) The purity of the F(ab′)2 fragment was determined by a thin slice scan.
Figure 3Neutralization assay for WNV using immune horse serum, purified IgG, and F(ab′)2 in vitro. The “21” and “56” are the horse ID numbers. The “21–7”, “56–7” and the “21–25”, “56–25” represent the sera that were collected after the fourth or fifth immunization, respectively. (A,B) Serum or (C,D) antibody samples from “56–25” were serially diluted in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and mixed 1:1 with 80 PFU (Plaque Forming Unit) WNV. After a 1-h incubation at 37 °C, the mixture was added to Vero cells for an additional 1 h. After absorption, the cells were then overlaid with 1.2% agarose. After a further incubation for 3 days, the agarose plugs were removed. The plaques were visualized by 0.1% crystal violet staining; (B) The dilutions; and (D) Concentrations for 50% of the maximal neutralizing effect are shown. * p < 0.05. Normal horse IgG was used as the control.
Figure 4Immune purified IgG and F(ab’)2 transfer protected WNV infected mice. Eight to twelve-week-old wild type (WT) C57BL/6 mice (A,B) or Mavs mice (C–E) were infected with 100 PFU WNV in the footpad (s.c.), and 500 μg of the purified horse immune IgG (hIgG) or the purified horse immune F(ab’)2 (hF(ab’)2) was injected (i.p.) into infected mice one day before (A,C) or after infection (B,D), or on both days (E). The mice were monitored for morbidity and mortality daily. The mice that received normal horse IgG were used as the controls. (A) n = 10, Control; n = 5, hIgG; n = 5, hF(ab′)2; (B) n = 10, Control; n = 5, hIgG; n = 5, hF(ab′)2; (C) n = 7, Control; n = 8, hIgG; n = 5, hF(ab′)2; (D) n = 7, Control; n = 6, hIgG; n = 5, hF(ab′)2; (E) n = 5, Control; n = 10, hIgG; n = 8, hF(ab′)2. For Figure 4C, p = 0.009 when Control group compared to hIgG group. p = 0.0123 when Control group compared to F(ab′)2 group. For Figure 4E, p = 0.0009 when Control group compared to hIgG group. p = 0.0291 when Control group compared to F(ab′)2 group.
Figure 5Immune purified IgG and F(ab′)2 transfer reduced the WNV load in the mice. Eight to twelve-week-old WT (A,B) and Mavs mice; (C,D) were infected with 100 PFU WNV in the footpad (s.c.), and 500 μg of the purified horse immune IgG (hIgG) or the purified horse immune F(ab′)2 (hF(ab′)2) was transferred (i.p.) one day before and one day after infection. To obtain the virus titers, the spleens (A,C) and brains (B,D) were homogenized at the indicated time points and titered using Vero cells. The titers are expressed as PFU/g tissue. n = 3–4 mice/group/time point. * p < 0.05. The mice that received normal horse IgG were used as the controls.