Literature DB >> 2799903

From bad to worse: evaluation by Journal Impact.

P O Seglen.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2799903     DOI: 10.1016/0968-0004(89)90163-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci        ISSN: 0968-0004            Impact factor:   13.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

Review 1.  [The impact factor as an assessment criterion of scientific achievements--the right to equal chances].

Authors:  S Lehrl
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists: The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology.

Authors:  T Opthof; A A M Wilde
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Iron, zinc and copper in the Alzheimer's disease brain: a quantitative meta-analysis. Some insight on the influence of citation bias on scientific opinion.

Authors:  Matthew Schrag; Claudius Mueller; Udochukwu Oyoyo; Mark A Smith; Wolff M Kirsch
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  The impact factor of the Netherlands Heart Journal in 2013.

Authors:  T Opthof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Bibliometric data in clinical cardiology revisited. The case of 37 Dutch professors.

Authors:  T Opthof; A A M Wilde
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Impact factor 2013 of the Netherlands Heart Journal surpasses 2.0.

Authors:  T Opthof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Ronald Rousseau; Gunnar Sivertsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.