Myriam Hamou-Segarra1, Laura Zamorano1, Grishma Vadlamani2, Mitchell Chu2, Irina Sanchez-Diener1, Carlos Juan1, Jesús Blazquez3, Mitchell Hattie4, Keith A Stubbs4, Brian L Mark2, Antonio Oliver5. 1. Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Palma (IdISPa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 2. Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 3. Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain. 4. School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. 5. Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Palma (IdISPa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain antonio.oliver@ssib.es.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interconnection between peptidoglycan (PG) recycling, fosfomycin susceptibility and synergy between fosfomycin and β-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa METHODS: Fosfomycin MICs were determined by broth microdilution and Etest for a panel of 47 PAO1 mutants defective in several components of PG recycling and/or AmpC induction pathways. PAO1 fosfomycin MICs were also determined in the presence of a 5 mM concentration of the NagZ inhibitor PUGNAc. Population analysis of fosfomycin susceptibility and characterization of the resistant mutants that emerged was also performed for selected strains. Finally, fosfomycin, imipenem and fosfomycin + imipenem killing curves were assessed. RESULTS: Mutants defective in AmpG, NagZ or all three AmpD amidases showed a marked increase in fosfomycin susceptibility (at least two 2-fold dilutions with respect to WT PAO1). Moreover, PAO1 fosfomycin MICs were consistently reduced from 48 to 24 mg/L in the presence of a 5 mM concentration of PUGNAc. Fosfomycin hypersusceptibility of the ampG, nagZ and triple ampD mutants was also clearly confirmed in the performed population analysis, although the emergence of resistant mutants, through GlpT mutations, was not avoided. Synergy between fosfomycin and imipenem was evidenced for the WT strain, the AmpC-hyperproducing strain (triple AmpD mutant) and the NagZ and AmpG mutants in killing curves. Moreover, regrowth of resistant mutants was not evidenced for the combination. CONCLUSIONS: PG recycling inhibitors are envisaged as useful adjuvants in the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections with β-lactams and fosfomycin and therefore further development of these molecules is encouraged.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interconnection between peptidoglycan (PG) recycling, fosfomycin susceptibility and synergy between fosfomycin and β-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa METHODS:Fosfomycin MICs were determined by broth microdilution and Etest for a panel of 47 PAO1 mutants defective in several components of PG recycling and/or AmpC induction pathways. PAO1 fosfomycin MICs were also determined in the presence of a 5 mM concentration of the NagZ inhibitor PUGNAc. Population analysis of fosfomycin susceptibility and characterization of the resistant mutants that emerged was also performed for selected strains. Finally, fosfomycin, imipenem and fosfomycin + imipenem killing curves were assessed. RESULTS: Mutants defective in AmpG, NagZ or all three AmpD amidases showed a marked increase in fosfomycin susceptibility (at least two 2-fold dilutions with respect to WT PAO1). Moreover, PAO1 fosfomycin MICs were consistently reduced from 48 to 24 mg/L in the presence of a 5 mM concentration of PUGNAc. Fosfomycin hypersusceptibility of the ampG, nagZ and triple ampD mutants was also clearly confirmed in the performed population analysis, although the emergence of resistant mutants, through GlpT mutations, was not avoided. Synergy between fosfomycin and imipenem was evidenced for the WT strain, the AmpC-hyperproducing strain (triple AmpD mutant) and the NagZ and AmpG mutants in killing curves. Moreover, regrowth of resistant mutants was not evidenced for the combination. CONCLUSIONS: PG recycling inhibitors are envisaged as useful adjuvants in the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections with β-lactams and fosfomycin and therefore further development of these molecules is encouraged.
Authors: María Díez-Aguilar; María Isabel Morosini; Emin Köksal; Antonio Oliver; Miquel Ekkelenkamp; Rafael Cantón Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Elise T Zeiser; Scott A Becka; Steven Park; Brigid M Wilson; Marisa L Winkler; Roshan D'Souza; Indresh Singh; Granger Sutton; Derrick E Fouts; Liang Chen; Barry N Kreiswirth; Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse; George L Drusano; David S Perlin; Robert A Bonomo Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: James Albiero; Josmar Mazucheli; Juliana Pimenta Dos Reis Barros; Marcia Maria Dos Anjos Szczerepa; Sheila Alexandra Belini Nishiyama; Floristher Elaine Carrara-Marroni; Serubbabel Sy; Matthew Fidler; Sherwin K B Sy; Maria Cristina Bronharo Tognim Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: G L Drusano; M N Neely; W M Yamada; Brandon Duncanson; David Brown; Michael Maynard; Michael Vicchiarelli; Arnold Louie Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Gabriel Torrens; Marcelo Pérez-Gallego; Bartolomé Moya; Marta Munar-Bestard; Laura Zamorano; Gabriel Cabot; Jesús Blázquez; Juan A Ayala; Antonio Oliver; Carlos Juan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gabriel Torrens; Isabel M Barceló; Marcelo Pérez-Gallego; Maria Escobar-Salom; Sara Tur-Gracia; Marta Munar-Bestard; María Del Mar González-Nicolau; Yoandy José Cabrera-Venegas; Estefany Nayarith Rigo-Rumbos; Gabriel Cabot; Carla López-Causapé; Estrella Rojo-Molinero; Antonio Oliver; Carlos Juan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 4.379