Literature DB >> 27998738

What Is Important for Confirming Negative Margins When Resecting Mandibular Ameloblastomas?

Zachary S Peacock1, Yisi D Ji2, William C Faquin3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of intraoperative radiographs and frozen sections in achieving negative margins and preventing recurrence of mandibular ameloblastomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent resection (≥1 cm) of mandibular ameloblastomas from 2005 through 2015. Patients were included if they had at least 1-year follow-up and complete records. Demographic variables included age, gender, and type of resection (segmental vs marginal). Predictor variables were type of margin assessment: 1) frozen section, 2) intraoperative ex vivo specimen radiograph, 3) both, or 4) none. The outcome variables were final margin status and recurrence rate. Accuracy of intraoperative radiographic margins was determined by comparison with histologic margin distance. Descriptive statistics were conducted with the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 35 patients (47.5 ± 20.4 yr old; 16 men) who underwent 25 segmental and 10 marginal resections. Ten had frozen sections only, 3 had ex vivo specimen radiographs only, 10 had no intraoperative measurements, and 12 had both. There were no positive frozen sections. One patient had a positive posterior bony margin at final pathology despite negative frozen section histology. There was no difference in recurrence rate at latest follow-up among cohorts. The anterior radiographic margin was 11.8 ± 5.9 mm compared with 11.5 ± 7.5 mm by histology (P = .124). The posterior radiographic margin was 12.3 ± 5.3 mm compared with 9.8 ± 6.5 mm histologically (P = .546). Margin distances that were at least 5 mm when measured with specimen radiographs had histologic margin distances of at least 5 mm in 25 of 30 resection margins (83.3%).
CONCLUSION: Resection of ameloblastoma with planned margins of at least 1 cm is sufficient to prevent recurrence of ameloblastoma. Achieving a radiographic margin of at least 5 mm provided a histologic margin of at least 5 mm 83.3% of the time.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27998738     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  1 in total

1.  Recurrent Ameloblastoma: A Surgical Challenge.

Authors:  Chithra Aramanadka; Abhay Taranath Kamath; Adarsh Kudva
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-02-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.