Literature DB >> 27998703

Rural-Urban Differences in Awareness and Use of Family Planning Services Among Adolescent Women in California.

Jennifer Yarger1, Martha J Decker2, Mary I Campa3, Claire D Brindis4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare awareness and use of family planning services by rural and urban program site among a sample of adolescent women before participation in the federal Personal Responsibility Education Program in California.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of survey data collected from youth before participation in California's Personal Responsibility Education Program. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for a sample of 4,614 females ages 14-18 years to compare awareness and use of family planning services between participants at rural and urban program sites, controlling for the program setting and participant demographic, sexual, and reproductive characteristics.
RESULTS: Overall, 61% of participants had heard of a family planning provider in their community, and 24% had visited a family planning provider. Awareness and use of family planning services were lower among rural participants than urban participants. After adjusting for the program setting and participant characteristics, rural participants were less likely to know about a family planning provider in their community (odds ratio, .64; 95% confidence interval, .50-.81) or receive family planning services (odds ratio, .76; 95% confidence interval, .58-.99) than urban participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that adolescents in rural areas face greater barriers to accessing family planning services than adolescents in urban areas. Targeted efforts to increase awareness and use of family planning services among adolescents in rural areas and among other underserved populations are needed.
Copyright © 2016 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Awareness; Family planning services; Rural; Urban

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27998703     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  4 in total

1.  Dispersion of contraceptive access policies across the United States from 2006 to 2021.

Authors:  Whitney S Rice; Sara K Redd; Alina A Luke; Kelli Komro; Kimberly Jacob Arriola; Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Rural-urban residence and emergency contraception use, access, and counseling in the United States, 2006-2017.

Authors:  Carly M Milkowski; Erika C Ziller; Katherine A Ahrens
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2021-02-08

3.  Association between history of abortion and current use of contraceptives among Mongolian Women.

Authors:  Yohane V A Phiri; Gunchmaa Nyam; Yuniar Wardani; Doreen Phiri; Kun-Yang Chuang; Hsing Jasmine Chao; Owen Nkoka
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Predictors of Bacterial Vaginosis among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinic at Tertiary Care Hospital in Tanzania: A Cross Sectional Study.

Authors:  Afrin F Shaffi; Belinda Balandya; Mtebe Majigo; Said Aboud
Journal:  East Afr Health Res J       Date:  2021-06-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.