| Literature DB >> 27997562 |
Yuxin Song1, Lingyang Xu1, Yan Chen1, Lupei Zhang1, Huijiang Gao1, Bo Zhu1, Hong Niu1, Wengang Zhang1, Jiangwei Xia1, Xue Gao1, Junya Li1.
Abstract
Carcass traits of beef cattle have been genetically improved to increase yield of high quality meat. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a powerful method to identify genetic variants associated with carcass traits. For the 770K genotyped SNPs from 1141 Chinese Simmental cattle, we used the compressed mixed linear model (CMLM) to perform a genome-wide association study for knuckle, biceps and shank of beef carcass traits. Seventeen significantly associated SNPs were found, which are located on BTA6, BTA14 and BTA15. Interestingly, one pleiotropic quantitative trait nucleotide (QTN), named BovineHD1400007259 (p < 10-8) within the well-known gene region PLAG1-CHCHD7 on BTA14, was found to govern variation of the knuckle, biceps and shank traits. The QTN accounted for 8.6% of phenotypic variance for biceps. In addition, 16 more SNPs distributed on BTA14 were detected as being associated with the carcass traits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27997562 PMCID: PMC5172584 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Means (standard deviations), coefficients of variations, heritabilities and pairwise phenotypic correlations between traits knuckle, biceps and shank
| Trait | N | Mean (kg) | Coefficient of variation | Heritability | Knuckle | Biceps | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knuckle | 1141 | 9.26(1.47) | 6.30 | 0.44 | 1 | ||
| Biceps | 1136 | 1.07(0.30) | 3.57 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 1 | |
| Shank | 1141 | 8.07(1.19) | 6.78 | 0.51 | 0.87 | 0.45 | 1 |
Fig 1Principal component (PC) plot.
The second principal component (PC2) is plotted against the first principal component (PC1). The four separated groups are marked by circles with number 1,2,3 and 4.
SNPs identified for Knuckle, biceps and shank.
| Trait | Chromosome | QTN | FDR adjust | Located gene | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knuckle | 14 | 4.73E-08 | 0.0317 | ||
| 6 | 2.36E-07 | 0.0790 | |||
| 6 | 2.36E-07 | 0.1242 | |||
| 15 | 7.52E-07 | 0.1259 | |||
| Biceps | 14 | 2.76E-08 | 0.0071 | ||
| 6 | 4.85E-08 | 0.0071 | |||
| 6 | 5.07E-08 | 0.0071 | |||
| 6 | 5.40E-08 | 0.0071 | |||
| 6 | 6.26E-08 | 0.0071 | |||
| 6 | 7.06E-08 | 0.0071 | - | ||
| 6 | 5.45E-07 | 0.0367 | - | ||
| 6 | 1.90E-07 | 0.0165 | - | ||
| 6 | 4.71E-07 | 0.0357 | - | ||
| 6 | 7.27E-07 | 0.0441 | |||
| Shank | 14 | 9.48E-09 | 0.0064 | ||
| 14 | 7.82E-08 | 0.0262 | - | ||
| 14 | 6.88E-07 | 0.1537 | - |
Fig 2Manhattan plot of -log10 (p) from the beef cattle GWAS for three carcass traits (knuckle, biceps and shank).
Chromosomes 1–29 are color coded separately. The horizontal reference line indicated the genome-wise significance levels (–log10(p) = 7.07).