Literature DB >> 27997198

In Vivo Drug Delivery Performance of Lipiodol-Based Emulsion or Drug-Eluting Beads in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Elsa Lilienberg1, Ilse R Dubbelboer1, Amar Karalli2,3, Rimma Axelsson2,3, Torkel B Brismar2,3, Charlotte Ebeling Barbier4, Agneta Norén5, Frans Duraj5, Mikael Hedeland6, Ulf Bondesson6, Erik Sjögren1, Per Stål7,8, Rickard Nyman4, Hans Lennernäs1.   

Abstract

Doxorubicin (DOX) delivered in a lipiodol-based emulsion (LIPDOX) or in drug-eluting beads (DEBDOX) is used as palliative treatment in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo delivery performance of DOX from LIPDOX or DEBDOX in HCC patients using the local and systemic pharmacokinetics of DOX and its main metabolite doxorubicinol (DOXol). Urinary excretion of DOX and DOXol and their short-term safety and antitumor effects were also evaluated. In this open, prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study, LIPDOX (n = 13) or DEBDOX (n = 12) were injected into the feeding arteries of the tumor. Local (vena cava/hepatic vein orifice) and systemic (peripheral vein) plasma concentrations of DOX and DOXol were determined in samples obtained up to 6 h and 7 days after treatment. Tumor response was assessed using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The Cmax and AUC0-24 h for DOX were 5.6-fold and 2.4-fold higher in LIPDOX vs DEBDOX recipients, respectively (p < 0.001). After 6 h, the respective mean proportions of the dose remaining in the liver or drug-delivery system (DDS) were 49% for LIPDOX and 88% for DEBDOX. LIPDOX releases DOX faster than DEBDOX in HCC patients and provides more extensive local and systemic exposure (AUC) to DOX and DOXol initially (0-7 days). DEBDOX formulation has a release and distribution of DOX that is more restricted and rate controlled than LIPDOX.

Entities:  

Keywords:  doxorubicin; doxorubicinol; drug eluting beads; hepatocellular carcinoma; lipiodol; liver cancer; local delivery; local therapy; transarterial chemoembolization; transarterial infusion chemotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27997198     DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  Bench-to-clinic development of imageable drug-eluting embolization beads: finding the balance.

Authors:  Andrew L Lewis; Sean L Willis; Matthew R Dreher; Yiqing Tang; Koorosh Ashrafi; Bradford J Wood; Elliot B Levy; Karun V Sharma; Ayele H Negussie; Andrew S Mikhail
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Super-stable homogeneous iodinated formulation technology for improving the therapeutic effect of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Pan He; Furui Zhong; Bin Luo; Guosong Luo; Xuewen Wang; Xianming Xia; Bo Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-11

3.  Systematic Review and Pharmacokinetic Meta-analysis of Doxorubicin Exposure in Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Doxorubicin-Eluted Beads Chemoembolization for Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Zarisfi; Arta Kasaeian; Anna Wen; Eleni Liapi
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Porcine and Human In Vivo Simulations for Doxorubicin-Containing Formulations Used in Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment.

Authors:  Ilse R Dubbelboer; Erik Sjögren; Hans Lennernäs
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Limitations and Possibilities of Transarterial Chemotherapeutic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Charlotte Ebeling Barbier; Femke Heindryckx; Hans Lennernäs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.