Literature DB >> 27996963

Genome resequencing and comparative variome analysis in a Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea collection.

Feng Cheng1, Jian Wu1, Chengcheng Cai1, Lixia Fu1, Jianli Liang1, Theo Borm2, Mu Zhuang1, Yangyong Zhang1, Fenglan Zhang3, Guusje Bonnema2, Xiaowu Wang1.   

Abstract

The closely related species Brassica rapa and B. oleracea encompass a wide range of vegetable, fodder and oil crops. The release of their reference genomes has facilitated resequencing collections of B. rapa and B. oleracea aiming to build their variome datasets. These data can be used to investigate the evolutionary relationships between and within the different species and the domestication of the crops, hereafter named morphotypes. These data can also be used in genetic studies aiming at the identification of genes that influence agronomic traits. We selected and resequenced 199 B. rapa and 119 B. oleracea accessions representing 12 and nine morphotypes, respectively. Based on these resequencing data, we obtained 2,249,473 and 3,852,169 high quality SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms), as well as 303,617 and 417,004 InDels for the B. rapa and B. oleracea populations, respectively. The variome datasets of B. rapa and B. oleracea represent valuable resources to researchers working on evolution, domestication or breeding of Brassica vegetable crops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27996963      PMCID: PMC5170593          DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Data        ISSN: 2052-4463            Impact factor:   6.444


Background & Summary

Many important crops have been domesticated and are cultivated from the genus Brassica, including those used as oilseeds, condiments, fodder, or vegetables. The ‘triangle of U’[1] describes the relationships between the six economically important Brassica species. Three of the six species are diploids (A genome, Brassica rapa, n=10; B genome, B. nigra, n=8; and C genome, B. oleracea, n=9), while the other three species are allotetraploids resulting from interspecific hybridization between the diploids (AB genomes, B. juncea, n=18; AC genomes, B. napus, n=19; BC genomes, B. carinata, n=17). These different crops are characterized by their specialized development of organs[2], and are referred to as morphotypes. Interestingly, similar morphotypes are often selected for in two or more Brassica species, clearly illustrating convergent crop domestication. This includes the leafy heads in Chinese cabbage (B. rapa) and cabbage (B. oleracea) and tubers at stems or hypocotyls/roots in kohlrabi’s (B. oleracea), swede’s (B. napus) and turnips (B. rapa), enlarged stems in marrow stem kale (B. oleracea) and also broccoletto (B. rapa), enlarged inflorescences in cauliflower and broccoli’s (B. oleracea), the many axillary shoots in Brussels sprouts (B. oleracea) and mizuna/mibuna’s (B. rapa) and the increased numbers of enlarged seedpods in oilseed (B. rapa and B. napus). In recent years, the genomes of B. rapa and B. oleracea have been assembled and released[3-5]. Brassicaceae comparative genomics provided 24 genomic blocks (GBs) as the framework for genome studies in Brassicas[6]. With the GBs system, the comparative genomic analysis of B. rapa, B. oleracea, and A. thaliana revealed the whole genome triplication (WGT) event that is shared by all Brassicas[7-9], and made it possible to deduce and reconstruct the diploid ancestor for the Brassiceae tribe[10]. Further studies reported the phenomenon of sub-genome dominance among the three sub-genomes in Brassicas[8,9], and found that the biased distribution of small RNA-targeted TEs plays an important role in this phenomenon[11,12]. Furthermore, the release of the genome sequences has also contributed to the mapping, cloning and functional studies of agronomic genes in Brassica crops, such as two clubroot resistance genes[13,14], two blackleg resistance genes[15,16], as well as two key genes regulating the time of flowering[17-19]. The availability of these reference genomes also made it possible to build variome datasets by resequencing populations of B. rapa and B. oleracea, to investigate domestication of the diverse morphotypes. Here, we selected 199 B. rapa and 119 B. oleracea accessions representing the 12 and nine morphotypes from these two species, respectively (Fig. 1, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). These accessions originate from a wide geographic range, from North till South Asia and Europe[20]. Whole genome resequencing data of these 199 B. rapa and 119 B.oleracea accessions was generated using the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform, with paired-end reads from 350 bp insert libraries. After filtering low-quality or duplicated reads, totally, we produced 982.87 Gb resequencing data for the 199 B. rapa accessions and 742.35 Gb for the 119 B. oleracea accessions, which is about on average 10× coverage for accessions of both B. rapa and B. oleracea, ranging from 1.67× till 19.8× coverage. These reads were then mapped to the reference genomes of B. rapa version V1.5 and B. oleracae V1.0, respectively. Finally, we called out 2,249,473 and 3,852,169 reliable SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms), as well as 303,617 and 417,004 InDels for the B. rapa and B. oleracea populations, respectively. With these datasets, we have identified genomic selection signals for traits of leaf-heading and tuberous organs in both B. rapa and B. oleracea, and found that sub-genome parallel selection was associated with morphotype diversification and convergent crop domestication in the two Brassica species[21].
Figure 1

Images of the different morphotypes of Brassica vegetables.

(a) ten images show representative morphotypes of B. rapa; (b) seven images show representative morphotypes of B. oleracea.

The whole genome resequencing data and variome datasets for the B. rapa and B. oleracea populations are valuable resources to researchers studying evolution, domestication or trait discovery, and to breeders of Brassica crops. These data can be exploited to develop genetic markers, and chip arrays for gene mapping and functional studies.

Methods

These methods are expanded versions of descriptions in our related work[21].

Sample collection of B. rapa and B. oleracea

Accessions representing the 12 morphotypes of B. rapa and nine morphotypes of B. oleracea were collected (Tables 1 and 2). Almost all morphotypes from the two Brassica species were included in this collection (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). The 199 B. rapa accessions included 46 Chinese cabbage accessions (B. rapa ssp. pekinensis) (Table 1), 54 turnip accessions (B. rapa ssp. rapa), 25 pak choi accessions (B. rapa ssp. chinensis), 30 caixin accessions (B. rapa ssp. parachinensis), 13 zicaitai accessions (B. rapa ssp. chinensis var. purpurea Bailey), 14 oil seed accessions (B. rapa ssp. oleifera), four taicai accessions (B. rapa ssp. chinensis var. tai-tsai Lin), seven wutacai accessions (B. rapa ssp. narinosa), one edible flower accession (B. rapa ssp. broccoletto) and one yellow sarson (B. rapa ssp. tricolaris), as well as two accessions each of komatsuna (B. rapa ssp. perviridis) and mizuna (B. rapa ssp. nipposinica). This B. rapa population includes 75 DH (doubled haploid) lines, 18 inbred lines, and 106 germplasm lines (Supplementary Table 1). The 119 B. oleracea accesions included 45 cabbage accessions (B. oleracea var. capitata) (Table 2), 19 kohlrabi accessions (B. oleracea var. gongylodes), 20 cauliflower accessions (B. oleracea var. botrytis), 23 broccoli accessions (B. oleracea var. italica), four Chinese kale accessions (B. oleracea var. alboglabra), as well as two accessions each of kale (B. oleracea var. acephala), Brussels sprouts (B. oleracea var. gemmifera), curly kale (B. oleracea var. sabellica), and wild B. oleracea. This B. oleracea population included 69 DH or inbred lines, 44 germplasm lines (inbred lines from genebank accessions), and six genebank accessions (Supplementary Table 2).
Table 1

Summary of the number of accessions per B. rapa morphotype.

IndexNameEnglish name morphotypeNumber
1ssp. pekinensisChinese cabbages46
2ssp. rapaturnip54
3ssp. chinensispak choi25
4ssp. parachinensiscaixin30
5ssp. chinensis var. purpurea Baileyzicaitai13
6ssp. oleiferaoil seeds14
7ssp. chinensis var. tai-tsai Lintaicai4
8ssp. narinosawutacai7
9ssp. broccolettoedible flower1
10ssp. tricolarisyellow sarson1
11ssp. perviridiskomatsuna2
12ssp. nipposinicamizuna2
Total//199
Table 2

Overview of the numbers of accessions per B. oleracea morphotype.

IndexNameEnglish name morphotypeNumber
1var. capitatacabbage45
2var. gongylodeskohlrabi19
3var. botrytiscauliflower20
4var. italicabroccoli23
5var. alboglabraChinese kale4
6var. acephalakale2
7var. gemmiferabrussels sprouts2
8var. sabellicacurly kale2
9wild typewild2
Total//119
We have grown all the 199 B. rapa accessions with three replicates in the green house during autumn 2014 to confirm their morphotypes. The phenotypes of these accessions were investigated till their maturity.

Sample preparation and resequencing

Plants of the 199 B. rapa accessions were grown in a greenhouse, each accession with five replicates. At the six-leaf stage, the two youngest leaves were collected from one of the five plants and DNA was extracted from these leaves. For B. oleracea, the DNA of the 44 germplasm lines and six genebank accessions was extracted as described for B. rapa. However for the DH and inbred lines, 50–100 seedlings per genotype were grown on moist filter paper. Cotyledons and hypocotyls were harvested after 12 days and DNA was then extracted. DNA libraries with approximately 350 bp insert sizes were constructed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina GAII) and paired-end resequencing reads were generated by commercial Illumina HiSeq 2000 service provided by Biomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, and BGI, Shenzhen.

Raw data were filtered before alignment

We filtered the raw reads before alignment to the corresponding reference genomes of B. rapa[3] or B. oleracea[5]. First, low quality reads were filtered based on the following three rules. If one end of a paired-end read had >5% ‘N’ bases, then the paired-end read was removed. Secondly, for each paired-end read pair, if one of two reads had an average base-quality less than 20 (Phred-like score), then both reads were removed. Thirdly, for each read, we trimmed its 3’ bases if the quality scores are below 13. The trimming was stopped at the base with quality score ≥13. After trimming, if the remaining read was less than 40, the paired-end reads were removed. Moreover, considering that the duplicates of paired-end reads were generated from a single amplicon, we further removed redundant duplicated reads and only kept a single pair. We completed this raw read filtering process using an in-house made Perl script.

Alignment and variants calling

Filtered reads of each re-sequenced sample were mapped onto the corresponding reference genomes using the software Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA version 0.7.5a-r405)[22]. We used the B. rapa genome version 1.5 and B. oleracae V1.0 as the references for the two species[4]. The reference genomes were first indexed by using commands as ‘bwa index reference.fa’ and ‘samtools faidx reference.fa’. The clean reads of each accession were then mapped to the indexed reference genomes one by one with the algorithm ‘mem’ of BWA. The command line was ‘bwa mem reference.fa sample_1.fq sample_2.fq>sample.sam’. It generated a sam file ‘sample.sam’ as the mapping output for each accession. This sam file can be handled by Samtools[23] to call variants. Samtools was used to call SNPs and InDels for each resequenced Brassica accession from the mapping results reported by BWA. Samtools (version 0.1.19–44428 cd)[23] was first used to transfer the sam file to bam file by command ‘samtools view -bS sample.sam sample.bam’. The bam file was then sorted by ‘samtools sort sample.bam sample.sorted.bam’. After index the sorted bam file with ‘samtools index sample.sorted.bam’, candidate genomic variants were called out by using the algorithm ‘mpileup’ of Samtools. The full command was ‘samtools mpileup -q 20 -Q 30 -ugf reference.index sample.sorted.bam | bcftools view -p 0.9 -cg ->candidateVariants.list’. We set ‘-q 20’ to use nucleotides with Phred-like quality scores higher than 20 as reliable nucleotides of a read to report variants. ‘-Q 30’ denotes that mapping quality of reads should be higher than 30 to be considered as a reliable mapping. Bcftools was used to transfer the vcf file generated by ‘mpileup’ and reported candidate variants in an output file[23]. We used ‘-p 0.9’ to ask Bcftools to report variants at a locus with more than 10% reads showing a different genotype to that of the reference. We further filtered the candidate variant list for reliable variants. For each accession, we screened its variations one by one. Here, we called the genotype that is the same as the reference ‘reference allele’, while the one that is different to the reference as ‘alternative allele’. For each variant, only alleles that were covered by sufficient reads (≥3 reads) were considered as confident alleles, and the variant was kept as a reliable variant. We performed this process for all Brassica accessions. This removed potentially false variants produced by sequencing errors. Since most of the Brassica samples (except six genebank accessions of B. oleracea) are from homozygous or almost homozygous accessions, we filtered our data further by retaining the variant calls that were homozygous in individual homozygous accessions (loci were considered as heterozygous if 0.2>DR/(DA+DR)>0.8, where DR denotes the number of reads with the reference allele, and DA denotes the number of reads with the alternative allele). We developed in-house Perl scripts to complete the candidate variants filtering processes. In order to remove rare SNPs and use common SNPs to scan for selection signals, we filtered out SNPs that had a MAF (minor allele frequency)<0.05 in both B. rapa and B. oleracea. Totally, we obtained 2,249,473 SNPs and 303,617 InDels for the B. rapa population, as well as 3,852,169 SNPs and 417,004 InDels for the B. oleracea population. For the two accessions with lowest re-sequencing depth in B. rapa and B. oleracea, we still obtained genotypes of 1,577,624 and 2,690,136 SNPs, respectively. We plotted genomic heterozygosity, density of SNPs and InDels along with the gene density to show the distribution features of these variants in the two Brassica genomes (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

The distribution of genomic variations on chromosomes of the resequenced populations of 199 B. rapa and 119 B. oleracea accessions.

(a) The genomic information of the B. rapa population; : the ten chromosomes of B. rapa, the physical positions are indicated in units of million bases; : the genomic heterozygosity of the B. rapa population. Area charts quantify : functional SNPs/InDels, : InDels, : SNPs. : heat map for gene density. : subgenome partition of the B. rapa genome, red, green, and blue corresponding to subgenomes LF, MF1, and MF2, respectively[10]. : The triplicated 24 genomic blocks in B. rapa[10]. (b) The genomic information of the B. oleracea population; : the nine chromosomes of B. oleracea; : the genomic heterozygosity of the B. oleracea population. Area charts quantify : functional SNPs/InDels, : InDels, : SNPs. : heat map for gene density. : subgenome partition in B. oleracea genome, red, green, and blue corresponding to subgenomes LF, MF1, and MF2, respectively[5]. : The triplicated 24 genomic blocks in B. oleracea[5]. LF denotes the least fractionated subgenome, MF1 and MF2 denote for more fractionated sub-genomes 1 and 2 (ref. 3).

Functional annotation of genomic variants

The variants identified in the two Brassica genomes were further annotated into different groups (Table 3 and Table 4). According to the genomic positions of SNPs and InDels relevant to predicted gene models, we first separated them into 1) variants located at genic regions and 2) at inter-genic regions. Variants located at genic regions were further separated into three subgroups: a) variants in coding sequences (CDs), b) in introns and c) in untranslated regions (UTRs). The SNPs and InDels located at CDs (1a) were classified into two subgroups: the subgroup causing changes to the coding amino acids, including non-synonymous SNPs and frame shift InDels, and the subgroup causing no changes to the amino acids, including synonymous SNPs and InDels that do not cause frame-shifts. Intronic variants (1b) were also separated into two subgroups: causing (8 bp to the splice site) or not causing splice site mutations; UTR variants (1c) are divided into two subgroups: variants in 5′ or 3′UTR regions (Fig. 3a,b). The results show that among these 2,249,473 SNPs and 303,617 InDels in B. rapa, 161,319 SNPs (nonsynonymous and splice site) and 16,905 InDels (CDS and splice site) respectively, introduced changes to the protein sequences (Table 3); for the 3,852,169 SNPs and 417,004 InDels in B. oleracea, 154,863 SNPs and 16,687 InDels respectively introduced changes to the protein sequences (Table 4). Additionally, we analyzed the length distribution of InDels, and found that 1 bp deletions or insertions are the dominant InDels (Fig. 3c) in both Brassica populations. The length distribution of InDels located in coding regions of genes was also investigated, and it was found that InDels of three or fold changes of three nucleotides are clearly the dominant types (Fig. 3d). These InDels will not introduce frame-shift mutations to genes, thus are under less stringent selection compared to InDels that don’t correspond to fold changes of three.
Table 3

The distribution of SNPs in the 199 B. rapa and 119 B. oleracea accessions.

 Genic
IntergenicTotal     
 CDS
 Intron
UTR
  
 nonSynSynspliceintron5UTR3UTR  
Abbreviations: CDS for coding sequences; nonSyn for non-synonymous; Syn for synonymous; UTR for untranslated region.        
B. rapa160,639298,671680320,898402,207297,313769,0652,249,473
B. oleracea154,038176,338825270,474474,953373,3032,402,2383,852,169
Table 4

The distribution of InDels in the 199 B. rapa and 119 B. oleracea accessions.

 Genic
IntergenicTotal     
 CDS
 Intron
UTR
  
 FrameshiftNonframeshiftspliceintron5UTR3UTR  
Note: frameshift means an InDel variation that causes a frameshift mutation; abbreviations are the same as in Table 3.        
B. rapa4,46710,7281,71068,51481,77956,34182,441303,617
B. oleracea5,7249,5161,44757,42782,44759,386203,441417,004
Figure 3

The distribution of genomic variations (SNPs and InDels) determined from the resequenced accessions of B. rapa and B. oleracea.

The distribution of 2,148,937 and 3,471,818 SNPs (a), as well as 312,618 and 276,587 InDels (b) in genomes of B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively. The length distributions of total InDels (c), as well as 17,018 and 13,502 InDels located at coding regions (d) in genomes of B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively. On the X-axis of (c,d), ‘−’ denotes deletion variants in numbers of bases, while ‘+’ denotes insertion variants in numbers of bases.

We further investigated the genetic diversity within each morphotype group in both species with the annotated genomic variations. We performed the analysis by counting the number of polymorphic variants in each morphotype group. The results showed that groups of turnip (54) and Chinese cabbages (46) in B. rapa had most polymorphic loci based on both total SNPs as well as functional SNPs (non-synonymous SNPs or SNPs located at splicing sites) (Supplementary Table 3). Interestingly, the groups of turnip and pak choi had the most polymorphic loci based on total InDels and functional InDels (InDels located at coding sequences or splicing sites). For B. oleracea, groups of cabbage (45) and kohlrabi (19) had both most polymorphic loci of SNPs and InDels (Supplementary Table 4). The number of polymorphic variants reflects the genetic diversity in each group. However, the number of variants is also impacted by the numbers of samples studied.

Code availability

Custom perl scripts used to filter raw reads and candidate genomic variants can be downloaded through http://brassicadb.org/brad/datasets/pub/ReseqPars/codes/ in Brassica database BRAD, or are freely available when requested by email to the authors. Other tools used in this work including version details are BWA (version 0.7.5a-r405) and SAMtools (version 0.1.19–44428 cd). Command lines with details of parameters when using these tools are described in the method section.

Data Records

All the raw reads of 199 B. rapa and 119 B. oleracea accessions used in this work have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive with the accession ID SRP071086 (Data Citation 1). The SNP and InDel datasets identified on the resequencing data and related vcf files are public available in Brassica Database BRAD (Data Citation 2).

Technical Validation

In order to measure the quality of variants called out from the resequencing data, we selected five SNPs (Table 5), and genotyped 95 out of the 199 B. rapa accessions for these SNPs using the method of KASP (kompetitive allele specific PCR). With the same method, we also test the polymorphic level of five SNPs determined from 119 B. oleracea accessions in another group of 281 B. oleracea accessions. KASP is a homogeneous, fluorescence-based endpoint SNP genotyping platform (LGC Genomics LLC, Beverly, MA, USA). The five selected SNPs satisfied the following criteria of KASP experiments: 1) No other genomic matches were found for the 50 bp sequences flanking the two sides of each candidate SNP; 2) There are no other SNPs or InDels located at the 50 bp flanking regions of the candidate SNP.
Table 5

Genotype verification of five SNP loci in 95 B. rapa accessions.

LociChromosomePosition#SamplesRatio of correction
1A01827840295100%
2A05565562795100%
3A08814967595100%
4A08802897395100%
5A10161057295100%
Total//475100%
For each SNP, two allele-specific primers A1 and A2 and one common reverse primer C were designed by LGC Genomics. The PCR reaction mixture had a total volume of 5 μl and included 2.5 μl DNA, 2.5 μl 2×master mix with 0.07 μl primer mix according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Three no-template controls were included for each SNP locus. The amplification process was ran in Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems) using the following program: 94 °C for 15 min followed by 10 touchdown cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 61–55 °C for 60 s (decreasing by 0.6 °C per cycle), followed by 26 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 55 °C for 60 s. Fluorescence detection was then performed in a 7900 HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), and the results were analysed using SDS2.3 Software (supplied by Applied Biosystems). We further compared the genotypes of the five SNPs in the 95 samples that were called out by resequencing data, with the genotypes of these loci that were reported by the KASP experiments. Results show that all the 475 loci analyzed have consistent genotypes between the two methods of resequencing and the KASP experiment (Table 5), supporting the fact that the genomic variants are of high quality. The polymorphism level of the five SNPs in B. oleracea is shown in Supplementary Table 5.

Usage Notes

All the resequencing datasets of this work are deposited in the NCBI database with the accession number SRP066057 (alias: PRJNA301642). Access to the plant materials (or DNA samples for materials provided from companies) described in this paper is possible for research purposes via a material transfer agreement with the material owners. Please contact Dr Xiaowu Wang (wangxiaowu@caas.cn) or Guusje Bonnema (guusje.bonnema@wur.nl).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Cheng, F. et al. Genome resequencing and comparative variome analysis in a Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea collection. Sci. Data 3:160119 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.119 (2016). Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  19 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of candidate Rlm4 blackleg resistance genes in Brassica napus using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Reece Tollenaere; Alice Hayward; Jessica Dalton-Morgan; Emma Campbell; Joanne R M Lee; Michal T Lorenc; Sahana Manoli; Jiri Stiller; Rosy Raman; Harsh Raman; David Edwards; Jacqueline Batley
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 9.803

2.  Deciphering the diploid ancestral genome of the Mesohexaploid Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Feng Cheng; Terezie Mandáková; Jian Wu; Qi Xie; Martin A Lysak; Xiaowu Wang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Epigenetic regulation of subgenome dominance following whole genome triplication in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Feng Cheng; Chao Sun; Jian Wu; James Schnable; Margaret R Woodhouse; Jianli Liang; Chengcheng Cai; Michael Freeling; Xiaowu Wang
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Subgenome parallel selection is associated with morphotype diversification and convergent crop domestication in Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea.

Authors:  Feng Cheng; Rifei Sun; Xilin Hou; Hongkun Zheng; Fenglan Zhang; Yangyong Zhang; Bo Liu; Jianli Liang; Mu Zhuang; Yunxia Liu; Dongyuan Liu; Xiaobo Wang; Pingxia Li; Yumei Liu; Ke Lin; Johan Bucher; Ningwen Zhang; Yan Wang; Hui Wang; Jie Deng; Yongcui Liao; Keyun Wei; Xueming Zhang; Lixia Fu; Yunyan Hu; Jisheng Liu; Chengcheng Cai; Shujiang Zhang; Shifan Zhang; Fei Li; Hui Zhang; Jifang Zhang; Ning Guo; Zhiyuan Liu; Jin Liu; Chao Sun; Yuan Ma; Haijiao Zhang; Yang Cui; Micheal R Freeling; Theo Borm; Guusje Bonnema; Jian Wu; Xiaowu Wang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The Brassica napus blackleg resistance gene LepR3 encodes a receptor-like protein triggered by the Leptosphaeria maculans effector AVRLM1.

Authors:  N J Larkan; D J Lydiate; I A P Parkin; M N Nelson; D J Epp; W A Cowling; S R Rimmer; M H Borhan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Xiaowu Wang; Hanzhong Wang; Jun Wang; Rifei Sun; Jian Wu; Shengyi Liu; Yinqi Bai; Jeong-Hwan Mun; Ian Bancroft; Feng Cheng; Sanwen Huang; Xixiang Li; Wei Hua; Junyi Wang; Xiyin Wang; Michael Freeling; J Chris Pires; Andrew H Paterson; Boulos Chalhoub; Bo Wang; Alice Hayward; Andrew G Sharpe; Beom-Seok Park; Bernd Weisshaar; Binghang Liu; Bo Li; Bo Liu; Chaobo Tong; Chi Song; Christopher Duran; Chunfang Peng; Chunyu Geng; Chushin Koh; Chuyu Lin; David Edwards; Desheng Mu; Di Shen; Eleni Soumpourou; Fei Li; Fiona Fraser; Gavin Conant; Gilles Lassalle; Graham J King; Guusje Bonnema; Haibao Tang; Haiping Wang; Harry Belcram; Heling Zhou; Hideki Hirakawa; Hiroshi Abe; Hui Guo; Hui Wang; Huizhe Jin; Isobel A P Parkin; Jacqueline Batley; Jeong-Sun Kim; Jérémy Just; Jianwen Li; Jiaohui Xu; Jie Deng; Jin A Kim; Jingping Li; Jingyin Yu; Jinling Meng; Jinpeng Wang; Jiumeng Min; Julie Poulain; Jun Wang; Katsunori Hatakeyama; Kui Wu; Li Wang; Lu Fang; Martin Trick; Matthew G Links; Meixia Zhao; Mina Jin; Nirala Ramchiary; Nizar Drou; Paul J Berkman; Qingle Cai; Quanfei Huang; Ruiqiang Li; Satoshi Tabata; Shifeng Cheng; Shu Zhang; Shujiang Zhang; Shunmou Huang; Shusei Sato; Silong Sun; Soo-Jin Kwon; Su-Ryun Choi; Tae-Ho Lee; Wei Fan; Xiang Zhao; Xu Tan; Xun Xu; Yan Wang; Yang Qiu; Ye Yin; Yingrui Li; Yongchen Du; Yongcui Liao; Yongpyo Lim; Yoshihiro Narusaka; Yupeng Wang; Zhenyi Wang; Zhenyu Li; Zhiwen Wang; Zhiyong Xiong; Zhonghua Zhang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  BRAD, the genetics and genomics database for Brassica plants.

Authors:  Feng Cheng; Shengyi Liu; Jian Wu; Lu Fang; Silong Sun; Bo Liu; Pingxia Li; Wei Hua; Xiaowu Wang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Fine mapping of the clubroot resistance gene CRb and development of a useful selectable marker in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Takeyuki Kato; Katsunori Hatakeyama; Nobuko Fukino; Satoru Matsumoto
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Biased gene fractionation and dominant gene expression among the subgenomes of Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Feng Cheng; Jian Wu; Lu Fang; Silong Sun; Bo Liu; Ke Lin; Guusje Bonnema; Xiaowu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Omics-Facilitated Crop Improvement for Climate Resilience and Superior Nutritive Value.

Authors:  Tinashe Zenda; Songtao Liu; Anyi Dong; Jiao Li; Yafei Wang; Xinyue Liu; Nan Wang; Huijun Duan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  From landrace to modern hybrid broccoli: the genomic and morphological domestication syndrome within a diverse B. oleracea collection.

Authors:  Zachary Stansell; Thomas Björkman
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.793

3.  Inferring the Demographic History of Inbred Species from Genome-Wide SNP Frequency Data.

Authors:  Paul D Blischak; Michael S Barker; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  IntroMap: a signal analysis based method for the detection of genomic introgressions.

Authors:  Daniel J Shea; Motoki Shimizu; Namiko Nishida; Eigo Fukai; Takashi Abe; Ryo Fujimoto; Keiichi Okazaki
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 5.  Current Status and Challenges in Identifying Disease Resistance Genes in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Ting Xiang Neik; Martin J Barbetti; Jacqueline Batley
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Population Structure and Phylogenetic Relationships in a Diverse Panel of Brassica rapa L.

Authors:  Kevin A Bird; Hong An; Elodie Gazave; Michael A Gore; J Chris Pires; Larry D Robertson; Joanne A Labate
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Long noncoding RNAs in Brassica rapa L. following vernalization.

Authors:  Daniel J Shea; Namiko Nishida; Satoko Takada; Etsuko Itabashi; Satoshi Takahashi; Ayasha Akter; Naomi Miyaji; Kenji Osabe; Hasan Mehraj; Motoki Shimizu; Motoaki Seki; Tomohiro Kakizaki; Keiichi Okazaki; Elizabeth S Dennis; Ryo Fujimoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Genome Size Variation and Comparative Genomics Reveal Intraspecific Diversity in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Julien Boutte; Loeiz Maillet; Thomas Chaussepied; Sébastien Letort; Jean-Marc Aury; Caroline Belser; Franz Boideau; Anael Brunet; Olivier Coriton; Gwenaëlle Deniot; Cyril Falentin; Virginie Huteau; Maryse Lodé-Taburel; Jérôme Morice; Gwenn Trotoux; Anne-Marie Chèvre; Mathieu Rousseau-Gueutin; Julie Ferreira de Carvalho
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla Genotypes.

Authors:  Peter Hempel; Annette Hohe; Conny Tränkner
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Genome re-sequencing, SNP analysis, and genetic mapping of the parental lines of a commercial F1 hybrid cultivar of Chinese cabbage.

Authors:  Daniel J Shea; Motoki Shimizu; Etsuko Itabashi; Naomi Miyaji; Junji Miyazaki; Kenji Osabe; Makoto Kaji; Keiichi Okazaki; Ryo Fujimoto
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.