Literature DB >> 27995826

Patient, staff, and clinician perspectives on implementing electronic communications in an interdisciplinary rural family health practice.

Feng Chang1, Thivaher Paramsothy2, Matthew Roche2, Nishi S Gupta1.   

Abstract

Aim To conduct an environmental scan of a rural primary care clinic to assess the feasibility of implementing an e-communications system between patients and clinic staff.
BACKGROUND: Increasing demands on healthcare require greater efficiencies in communications and services, particularly in rural areas. E-communications may improve clinic efficiency and delivery of healthcare but raises concerns about patient privacy and data security.
METHODS: We conducted an environmental scan at one family health team clinic, a high-volume interdisciplinary primary care practice in rural southwestern Ontario, Canada, to determine the feasibility of implementing an e-communications system between its patients and staff. A total of 28 qualitative interviews were conducted (with six physicians, four phone nurses, four physicians' nurses, five receptionists, one business office attendant, five patients, and three pharmacists who provide care to the clinic's patients) along with quantitative surveys of 131 clinic patients. Findings Patients reported using the internet regularly for multiple purposes. Patients indicated they would use email to communicate with their family doctor for prescription refills (65% of respondents), appointment booking (63%), obtaining lab results (60%), and education (50%). Clinic staff expressed concerns about patient confidentiality and data security, the timeliness, complexity and responsibility of responses, and increased workload.
CONCLUSION: Clinic staff members are willing to use an e-communications system but clear guidelines are needed for successful adoption and to maintain privacy of patient health data. E-communications might improve access to and quality of care in rural primary care practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic communications; family practice; outpatient health services; patient survey; qualitative interview; rural primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27995826     DOI: 10.1017/S1463423616000414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev        ISSN: 1463-4236            Impact factor:   1.458


  10 in total

1.  A Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention (InvolveMe): Qualitative Study on the Implementation Preparation Based on Identified Facilitators and Barriers.

Authors:  Berit Seljelid; Cecilie Varsi; Lise Solberg Nes; Kristin Astrid Øystese; Elin Børøsund
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England.

Authors:  Hannah B Edwards; Elsa Marques; William Hollingworth; Jeremy Horwood; Michelle Farr; Elly Bernard; Chris Salisbury; Kate Northstone
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The effectiveness of mI SMART: A nurse practitioner led technology intervention for multiple chronic conditions in primary care.

Authors:  Jennifer A Mallow; Laurie A Theeke; Elliott Theeke; Brian K Mallow
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2018-03-31

4.  COVID-19 and beyond: virtual consultations in primary care-reflecting on the evidence base for implementation and ensuring reach: commentary article.

Authors:  Freda Mold; Debbie Cooke; Athena Ip; Parijat Roy; Susan Denton; Jo Armes
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2021-01

Review 5.  Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review.

Authors:  Patricia Charlton; Terri Kean; Rebecca H Liu; Daniel A Nagel; Rima Azar; Shelley Doucet; Alison Luke; William Montelpare; Kim Mears; Leah Boulos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Evaluation of clustering and topic modeling methods over health-related tweets and emails.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura; Sergio Gonzales; Juandiego Morzan; Hugo Alatrista-Salas; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Jiang Bian
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 7.011

7.  Evaluation of a Digital Consultation and Self-Care Advice Tool in Primary Care: A Multi-Methods Study.

Authors:  Julie Cowie; Eileen Calveley; Gillian Bowers; John Bowers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Attitudes of rural communities towards the use of technology for health purposes in New Zealand: a focus group study.

Authors:  Duncan R Babbage; Kirsten van Kessel; Agnes Terraschke; Juliet Drown; Hinemoa Elder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Christine Jacob; Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez; Chris Ivory
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of a Clinical Photo Documentation App and its Implications for Clinical Workflows and Quality of Care: Qualitative Case Study.

Authors:  Christine Jacob; Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez; Chris Ivory
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.773

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.