Feng Chang1, Thivaher Paramsothy2, Matthew Roche2, Nishi S Gupta1. 1. 1School of Pharmacy,University of Waterloo,Waterloo,Ontario,Canada. 2. 2School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo,Waterloo,Ontario,Canada.
Abstract
Aim To conduct an environmental scan of a rural primary care clinic to assess the feasibility of implementing an e-communications system between patients and clinic staff. BACKGROUND: Increasing demands on healthcare require greater efficiencies in communications and services, particularly in rural areas. E-communications may improve clinic efficiency and delivery of healthcare but raises concerns about patient privacy and data security. METHODS: We conducted an environmental scan at one family health team clinic, a high-volume interdisciplinary primary care practice in rural southwestern Ontario, Canada, to determine the feasibility of implementing an e-communications system between its patients and staff. A total of 28 qualitative interviews were conducted (with six physicians, four phone nurses, four physicians' nurses, five receptionists, one business office attendant, five patients, and three pharmacists who provide care to the clinic's patients) along with quantitative surveys of 131 clinic patients. Findings Patients reported using the internet regularly for multiple purposes. Patients indicated they would use email to communicate with their family doctor for prescription refills (65% of respondents), appointment booking (63%), obtaining lab results (60%), and education (50%). Clinic staff expressed concerns about patient confidentiality and data security, the timeliness, complexity and responsibility of responses, and increased workload. CONCLUSION: Clinic staff members are willing to use an e-communications system but clear guidelines are needed for successful adoption and to maintain privacy of patient health data. E-communications might improve access to and quality of care in rural primary care practices.
Aim To conduct an environmental scan of a rural primary care clinic to assess the feasibility of implementing an e-communications system between patients and clinic staff. BACKGROUND: Increasing demands on healthcare require greater efficiencies in communications and services, particularly in rural areas. E-communications may improve clinic efficiency and delivery of healthcare but raises concerns about patient privacy and data security. METHODS: We conducted an environmental scan at one family health team clinic, a high-volume interdisciplinary primary care practice in rural southwestern Ontario, Canada, to determine the feasibility of implementing an e-communications system between its patients and staff. A total of 28 qualitative interviews were conducted (with six physicians, four phone nurses, four physicians' nurses, five receptionists, one business office attendant, five patients, and three pharmacists who provide care to the clinic's patients) along with quantitative surveys of 131 clinic patients. Findings Patients reported using the internet regularly for multiple purposes. Patients indicated they would use email to communicate with their family doctor for prescription refills (65% of respondents), appointment booking (63%), obtaining lab results (60%), and education (50%). Clinic staff expressed concerns about patient confidentiality and data security, the timeliness, complexity and responsibility of responses, and increased workload. CONCLUSION: Clinic staff members are willing to use an e-communications system but clear guidelines are needed for successful adoption and to maintain privacy of patient health data. E-communications might improve access to and quality of care in rural primary care practices.
Entities:
Keywords:
electronic communications; family practice; outpatient health services; patient survey; qualitative interview; rural primary care
Authors: Berit Seljelid; Cecilie Varsi; Lise Solberg Nes; Kristin Astrid Øystese; Elin Børøsund Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Hannah B Edwards; Elsa Marques; William Hollingworth; Jeremy Horwood; Michelle Farr; Elly Bernard; Chris Salisbury; Kate Northstone Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Patricia Charlton; Terri Kean; Rebecca H Liu; Daniel A Nagel; Rima Azar; Shelley Doucet; Alison Luke; William Montelpare; Kim Mears; Leah Boulos Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura; Sergio Gonzales; Juandiego Morzan; Hugo Alatrista-Salas; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Jiang Bian Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 7.011