OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and relevant analytes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer and hepatic impairment. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in three independent parallel cohorts based on hepatic function per Child-Pugh criteria: normal hepatic function, mild hepatic impairment, and moderate hepatic impairment. Patients received T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. PK samples were collected during cycles 1 and 3, and the PK of T-DM1 and relevant analytes were characterized and compared across cohorts. RESULTS: Compared with patients with normal hepatic function (n = 10), T-DM1 clearance at cycle 1 was 1.8- and 4.0-fold faster in the mild (n = 10) and moderate (n = 8) cohorts, respectively. The trend of faster clearance was less apparent in cycle 3, with similar T-DM1 clearance across cohorts (mean ± standard deviation 8.16 ± 3.27 [n = 9], 9.74 ± 3.62 [n = 7], and 8.99 and 10.2 [individual values, n = 2] mL/day/kg for the normal, mild, and moderate cohorts, respectively). T-DM1 clearance at cycle 1 correlated significantly with baseline albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, and HER2 extracellular domain concentrations (p < 0.05). Plasma concentrations of DM1 and DM1-containing catabolites were low and were comparable across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: No increase in systemic DM1 concentration was observed in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment versus those with normal hepatic function. The faster T-DM1 clearance observed at cycle 1 in patients with hepatic impairment appeared to be transient. After repeated dosing (three cycles), T-DM1 exposure in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment was within the range seen in those with normal hepatic function.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and relevant analytes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer and hepatic impairment. METHODS:Patients were enrolled in three independent parallel cohorts based on hepatic function per Child-Pugh criteria: normal hepatic function, mild hepatic impairment, and moderate hepatic impairment. Patients received T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. PK samples were collected during cycles 1 and 3, and the PK of T-DM1 and relevant analytes were characterized and compared across cohorts. RESULTS: Compared with patients with normal hepatic function (n = 10), T-DM1 clearance at cycle 1 was 1.8- and 4.0-fold faster in the mild (n = 10) and moderate (n = 8) cohorts, respectively. The trend of faster clearance was less apparent in cycle 3, with similar T-DM1 clearance across cohorts (mean ± standard deviation 8.16 ± 3.27 [n = 9], 9.74 ± 3.62 [n = 7], and 8.99 and 10.2 [individual values, n = 2] mL/day/kg for the normal, mild, and moderate cohorts, respectively). T-DM1 clearance at cycle 1 correlated significantly with baseline albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, and HER2 extracellular domain concentrations (p < 0.05). Plasma concentrations of DM1 and DM1-containing catabolites were low and were comparable across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: No increase in systemic DM1 concentration was observed in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment versus those with normal hepatic function. The faster T-DM1 clearance observed at cycle 1 in patients with hepatic impairment appeared to be transient. After repeated dosing (three cycles), T-DM1 exposure in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment was within the range seen in those with normal hepatic function.
Authors: Amit Garg; Angelica Quartino; Jing Li; Jin Jin; D Russell Wada; Hanbin Li; Javier Cortés; Virginia McNally; Graham Ross; Jennifer Visich; Bert Lum Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Sandhya Girish; Manish Gupta; Bei Wang; Dan Lu; Ian E Krop; Charles L Vogel; Howard A Burris Iii; Patricia M LoRusso; Joo-Hee Yi; Ola Saad; Barbara Tong; Yu-Waye Chu; Scott Holden; Amita Joshi Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Gail D Lewis Phillips; Guangmin Li; Debra L Dugger; Lisa M Crocker; Kathryn L Parsons; Elaine Mai; Walter A Blättler; John M Lambert; Ravi V J Chari; Robert J Lutz; Wai Lee T Wong; Frederic S Jacobson; Hartmut Koeppen; Ralph H Schwall; Sara R Kenkare-Mitra; Susan D Spencer; Mark X Sliwkowski Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Baiteng Zhao; Robert Chen; Owen A O'Connor; Ajay K Gopal; Radhakrishnan Ramchandren; Andre Goy; Jeffrey V Matous; Adedigbo A Fasanmade; Thomas J Manley; Tae H Han Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-05-29 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Dan Lu; Tong Lu; Rong Shi; Leonid Gibiansky; Priya Agarwal; Colby S Shemesh; Randall C Dere; Uzor Ogbu; Jamie Hirata; Pascal Chanu; Sandhya Girish; Jin Yan Jin; Chunze Li; Dale Miles Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 4.200