| Literature DB >> 27995166 |
Jacqueline F Aitken1, Kerry M Loomes2, Isabel Riba-Garcia3, Richard D Unwin3, Gordana Prijic1, Ashley S Phillips4, Anthony R J Phillips5, Donghai Wu6, Sally D Poppitt1, Ke Ding7, Perdita E Barran4, Andrew W Dowsey8, Garth J S Cooper9.
Abstract
Here we provide data describing the time-course of blood-glucose and fluid-intake profiles of diabetic hemizygous human-amylin (hA) transgenic mice orally treated with rutin, and matched control mice treated with water. We employed "parametric change-point regression analysis" for investigation of differences in time-course profiles between the control and rutin-treatment groups to extract, for each animal, baseline levels of blood glucose and fluid-intake, the change-point time at which blood glucose (diabetes-onset) and fluid-intake (polydipsia-onset) accelerated away from baseline, and the rate of this acceleration. The parametric change-point regression approach applied here allowed a much more accurate determination of the exact time of onset of diabetes than do the standard diagnostic criteria. These data are related to the article entitled "Rutin suppresses human-amylin/hIAPP misfolding and oligomer formation in-vitro, and ameliorates diabetes and its impacts in human-amylin/hIAPP transgenic mice" (J.F. Aitken, K.M. Loomes, I. Riba-Garcia, R.D. Unwin, G. Prijic, A.S. Phillips, A.R.J. Phillips, D. Wu, S.D. Poppitt, K. Ding, P.E. Barran, A.W. Dowsey, G.J.S. Cooper. 2016) [1].Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27995166 PMCID: PMC5156598 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1A. Blood-glucose profiles of non-transgenic animals (points) and transgenic littermates (crosses) for the investigation of rutin treatment in hA-transgenic mice (n=12 control pairs, n=10 rutin-treated pairs). For each pair, the pair׳s weaning and the transgenic׳s day of death are shown as black-vertical lines. Each time-course is centred on the transgenic׳s most likely day of diabetes-onset (red-vertical line), which was inferred by parametric change-point regression analysis as the time point at which the profile changes from a constant baseline to a constant acceleration from baseline. The most likely fitted profile (joint posterior mode) is shown for each transgenic (red curve) and non-transgenic (dashed-red line). The uncertainty of the fit is illustrated for each transgenic׳s profile (grey, 95% credible interval) and diabetes-onset change-point (red posterior distribution positioned over the x-axis at day zero). Results for the conventional method for determining diabetes onset (two consecutive weekly measurements >11 mM) are also shown (dotted-red vertical lines), illustrating the inaccuracy and therefore limited utility of this approach for sensitive between-treatment comparisons. Fig. 1B. Fluid-intake profiles of non-transgenic animals (points) and transgenic littermates (crosses) corresponding to the blood-glucose profiles shown in Fig. 1A. Data points removed before parametric modelling are greyed out. Each time-course is centred on the transgenic׳s most likely fluid-intake change-point (blue-vertical line), with the respective blood-glucose change-point from Fig. 1A superimposed (red-vertical line). The most likely fitted profile (joint-posterior mode) is shown for each transgenic (blue curve) and non-transgenic littermate (dashed-blue line). The uncertainty of the fit is shown for each transgenic׳s profile (grey, 95% credible interval), and the change-points for blood glucose and fluid-intake (red and blue posterior distributions respectively, both positioned over the x-axis at their respective change-points). These posterior distributions illustrate that the fluid-intake change-points are estimated with more certainty than the blood-glucose change-points.(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article)
Metadata and parameters inferred from parametric change-point modelling of the control and rutin-treated transgenic mice, together with corresponding results for non-parametric survival analysis (two-tailed Wilcoxon test) and parametric testing (two-tailed t-test).
| Treatment | ID | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wean to Death (Days) | Wean to Diagnosis (Days) | Diagnosis to Death (Days) | Wean to Change-point (Days) | Change-point to Death (Days) | Acceleration from Baseline (log mM2/Day) | Baseline (mM) | Baseline (mM) | Wean to Change-point (Days) | Change-point to Death (Days) | Acceleration from Baseline (log mM2/Day) | Baseline (ml) | Baseline (ml) | Change-point to change-point (Days) | ||
| 1 | 514 | 257 | 257 | 342 | 172 | −5.4 | 10.2 | 7.9 | 383 | 131 | −3.7 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 40 | |
| 2 | 363 | 217 | 146 | 193 | 170 | −5.7 | 9.8 | 7.6 | 246 | 117 | −3.8 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 53 | |
| 3 | 168 | 44 | 124 | 61 | 107 | −4.7 | 9.9 | 7.1 | 91 | 77 | −3.5 | 4.5 | 3.7 | 30 | |
| 4 | 194 | 97 | 97 | 88 | 106 | −4.1 | 10.8 | 7.8 | 104 | 90 | −3.6 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 17 | |
| 5 | 331 | 253 | 78 | 233 | 98 | −4.6 | 9.0 | 7.6 | 274 | 57 | −0.7 | 3.8 | – | 41 | |
| 6 | 158 | 68 | 90 | 63 | 95 | −3.8 | 10.9 | 7.9 | 90 | 68 | −1.0 | 5.4 | 4.0 | 27 | |
| 7 | 182 | 118 | 64 | 97 | 85 | −4.1 | 8.9 | 7.5 | 114 | 68 | −3.0 | 7.4 | 4.4 | 17 | |
| 8 | 276 | 217 | 59 | 198 | 78 | −5.2 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 238 | 38 | −3.8 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 40 | |
| 9 | 95 | 41 | 54 | 19 | 76 | −4.5 | 9.1 | 8.0 | 50 | 45 | −3.2 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 31 | |
| 10 | 155 | 83 | 72 | 85 | 70 | −3.4 | 10.1 | 7.4 | 98 | 57 | −2.7 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 13 | |
| 11 | 143 | 93 | 50 | 76 | 67 | −2.0 | 9.5 | 7.9 | 80 | 63 | −2.6 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 4 | |
| 12 | 236 | 195 | 41 | 177 | 59 | −3.2 | 8.5 | 7.9 | 186 | 50 | −2.6 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 10 | |
| 1 | 441 | 241 | 200 | 215 | 226 | −6.3 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 295 | 146 | −4.7 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 80 | |
| 2 | 295 | 58 | 237 | 75 | 220 | −6.6 | 10.9 | 8.2 | 174 | 121 | −3.4 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 99 | |
| 3 | 251 | 37 | 214 | 56 | 195 | −6.2 | 10.5 | 7.4 | 129 | 122 | −5.0 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 73 | |
| 4 | 213 | 78 | 135 | 33 | 180 | −6.2 | 9.5 | 7.7 | 121 | 92 | −3.0 | 5.9 | 5.3 | 87 | |
| 5 | 353 | 201 | 152 | 184 | 169 | −5.8 | 9.3 | 7.7 | 243 | 110 | −3.4 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 58 | |
| 6 | 277 | 153 | 124 | 117 | 160 | −5.1 | 8.9 | 7.3 | 154 | 123 | −4.1 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 302 | 70 | 232 | 142 | 160 | −5.6 | 11.5 | 7.4 | 193 | 109 | −4.2 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 51 | |
| 8 | 161 | 71 | 90 | 49 | 112 | −4.8 | 8.7 | 7.5 | 79 | 82 | −3.7 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 29 | |
| 9 | 129 | 60 | 69 | 41 | 88 | −3.2 | 8.1 | 7.5 | 55 | 74 | −2.4 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 13 | |
| 10 | 140 | 78 | 62 | 62 | 78 | −3.6 | 9.1 | 8.1 | 79 | 61 | −2.8 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 17 | |
| Wilcoxon | Wilcoxon | Wilcoxon | Wilcoxon | Wilcoxon | Wilcoxon | Wilcoxon | Wilcoxon | ||||||||
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data were acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |