| Literature DB >> 27995099 |
Gaetano Liuzzo1, Roberto Rossi1, Federica Giacometti2, Silvia Piva2, Andrea Serraino2, Giulia Mescolini2, Gianfranco Militerno2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess whether Döner kebabs sold in Italy comply with legal labelling requirements. A checklist of EU labelling requirements was drawn up and nine labels of Döner kebab marketed in the province of Modena were collected to evaluate the mandatory information laid down in article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 together with the mandatory requirements of Regulation (EC) 853/2004 for meat preparations. The study showed that different additives are commonly used in Döner kebabs, including E 621 (monosodium glutamate). This additive is not included among the ingredients authorized for the meat preparation food category. Eight frozen Döner kebab samples were taken and a visual assessment and a histologic examination were performed to verify potential changes in the meat's inner muscle fibre structure that could allow the product to be considered among meat preparations or meat products. The Döner kebab labels showed several systematically deficient regulatory requirements in both extrinsic defects (not related to food composition) and aspects concerning the protection of consumers' health. Histological examination showed that the tissue was moderately swollen, but the muscle fibre structure was intact. Kebab can be reasonably classified as a meat preparation thereby precluding the use monosodium glutamate (E 621) as an ingredient.Entities:
Keywords: Additives; Döner kebab; Label; Mislabeling
Year: 2016 PMID: 27995099 PMCID: PMC5136744 DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2016.6149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Food Saf ISSN: 2239-7132
Checklist used to evaluate the compliance of nine Döner kebab labels to European Union regulatory requirements according to Regulation 1169/2011/EU and non-conformities found.
| Category | Examined information | Label NC (n) | NC description (non-compliant labels, n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity information | Name of the food | 6 | Absence of the indication of the physical condition of the food (6); Absence of the indication of added proteins (2) |
| List of ingredients | 9 | Incorrect indication of ingredients (9); descending order of ingredients (2) | |
| Quantity of certain ingredients or categories of them | 4 | Absence of the indication of quantity of ingredients included in the name of the food (4) | |
| Net quantity | 1 | Absence of the indication of units of mass (1) | |
| Name or business name and the address of the FBO responsible for the information | 3 | The address on the label matches the production plant but not trade mark proprietors’ (3) | |
| Identification mark or health mark | 3 | Readability of the approval number (1); the production plant with the approval number did not have an adequate approval for the production of meat preparations (2) | |
| Batch identification | 8 | Absence of the lot number (3); lot wording did not comply with the regulation (5) | |
| Information on protection of consumers’ health | Indication of substances causing allergies | 6 | Absence of indication of ingredients potentially causing allergies (6) |
| Date of minimum durability or | 9 | The date of minimum durability is not correctly indicated (4); the use by date is not correctly indicated (5) | |
| Special storage conditions and/or conditions of use | 6 | Storage conditions at freezing temperature (6) | |
| Instructions for use | 3 | Absence of instructions for use (3) |
NC, non-conformity; FBO, food business operator.
Figure 1.Histological image of Döner kebab. Longitudinal striated muscle fibres, with peripheral elongated nuclei. Haematoxylin and eosin staining, 200x.
Figure 2.Histological image of Döner kebab. Cross-sections of striated muscle fibres, with peripheral nuclei. Haematoxylin and eosin staining, 200x.