| Literature DB >> 27994856 |
Isaac E Lloyd1, Alexander Gallan2, Hunter K Huston3, Kalani L Raphael3, Dylan V Miller1, Monica P Revelo1, Mazdak A Khalighi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) includes both C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) and dense deposit disease (DDD) and is defined by C3-dominant deposits on immunofluorescence. Dysfunction of the alternative pathway (AP) of complement is central to the pathophysiology of C3G and young patients often harbor genetic alterations of AP mediators. Recently, a link between C3G and paraproteinemia has been established. We performed this study to better characterize older patients with C3G where this association is more frequently seen.Entities:
Keywords: C3 glomerulopathy; alternative pathway; monoclonal gammopathy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27994856 PMCID: PMC5162413 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfw090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Kidney J ISSN: 2048-8505
Clinical data
| Patient | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age/sex | 63/M | 67/F | 63/M | 52/M | 54/M | 68/M | 64/M | 60/M | 90/F | 55/F | 75/M | 77/M |
| Presenting SCr/eGFR | 2.8/23 | 2/25 | 2.3/29 | 2.4/29 | 1.9/37 | 1.9/35 | 1.5/47 | 1.8/39 | 2.5/18 | 1.2/47 | n/a | 6.9/8 |
| Proteinuria (g/day) | 7 | 3 | 10 | 4.5 | <1 | 1.1 | >3.5 | <1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | n/a | 1.8 |
| Hematuria | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Complement C3 | 55 | 140 | 106 | 111 | n/a | Low | n/a | 99 | 109 | 105 | Normal | low |
| SPEP/IFE | IgG κ | IgG κ | IgG κ | IgG κ | IgG λ | – | IgG κ | – | IgG κ | IgG κ | IgA κ | IgG κ |
| BM biopsy | MGRS | Polyclonal plasmacytosis | MM | MM | MM | n/a | MGRS | n/a | n/a | MM | MGRS | MGRS |
| Follow-up time (months) | 120 | 2 | 24 | 36 | 66 | 17 | 2 | 10 | 36 | 36 | 40 | 24 |
| Follow-up SCr/eGFR | ESRD | 1.83/27 | ESRD | ESRD | ESRD | 1.9/35 | eGFR: 47 | 1.8/37 | 2.4/19 | 0.9/64 | 1.8/37 | ESRD |
SCr, serum creatinine (mg/dL); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2); SPEP, serum protein electrophoresis; IFE, immunofixation electrophoresis; BM, bone marrow; MM, multiple myeloma; MGRS, monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.
Pathologic features
| Patient | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glomeruli, | 17 | 20 | 32 | 18 | 10 | 21 | 14 | 19 | 10 | 17 | 24 | 9 | 22 | 31 |
| Pattern of injury | MPGN | FPGN | MPGN | MPGN | MPGN | MPGN | MPGN | MesPGN | MesPGN | MPGN | MPGN | MPGN | MesPGN | DPGN |
| Global sclerosis, % | 20 | 0 | 56 | 39 | 20 | 57 | 29 | 42 | 40 | 59 | 4 | 33 | 5 | 48 |
| IFTA, % | 50 | 0 | 30 | 70 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 60 | 20 | 30 | 20 | 70 |
| IF microscopy (frozen) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (2+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) | C3 (3+) |
| IF microscopy (paraffin, IgG/κ/λ) | n/a | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| C4d | n/a | MES | Neg | MES (1+) | MES (1+) | Neg | n/a | MES | MES | MES | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| Ultrastructural localization of deposits | MES | MES | MES | MES | MES | DDD | MES | MES | MES | MES | MES | DDD | DDD | MES |
MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; FPGN, focal proliferative glomerulonephritis; DPGN, diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis; MesPGN, mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis; IF, immunofluorescence; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; MES, mesangial; SEN, subendothelial; SEP, subepithelial; IN, intramembranous; DDD, dense deposit disease.
Fig. 1.A membranoproliferative pattern of glomerular injury was the predominant pattern of injury in 64% of biopsies as seen in this 52-year-old male (patient 4), with lobular accentuation of the glomerular tuft, mesangial and endocapillary hypercellularity and segmental glomerular basement membrane duplication. Serum protein electrophoresis showed IgG κ, with bone marrow biopsy revealing smoldering myeloma. Three years after presentation, he progressed to ESRD requiring HD.
Fig. 2.All biopsies showed dominant C3 staining by routine immunofluorescence microscopy as seen in this 64-year-old male (patient 7) with an IgG κ paraprotein and bone marrow biopsy showing monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Additional staining for C4d showed only trace mesangial staining in this patient (B).
Fig. 3.(A) Ultrastructural examination identified three patients with elongated hyperosmiophilic intramembranous deposits replacing the lamina densa, defining dense deposit disease. (B) Seven patients with C3 GN also demonstrated segmental intramembranous deposits. (C) Subepithelial hump-like deposits were identified in 64% of patients and were most commonly segmental in distribution. (D) One patient (patient 2) showed vague substructural organization with a variegated appearance within deposits.