Literature DB >> 27994527

Generalizability of Dutch Prediction Models for Low Hemoglobin Deferral: A Study on External Validation and Updating in Swiss Whole Blood Donors.

A Mireille Baart1, Stefano Fontana2, Anita Tschaggelar2, Martijn W Heymans3, Wim L A M de Kort1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex-specific prediction models for low hemoglobin (Hb) deferral have been developed in Dutch whole blood donors. In this study, we validated and updated the models in a cohort of Swiss whole blood donors.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 53,772 Swiss whole blood donors were used. The predictive performance of the Dutch models was assessed in terms of calibration (agreement between predicted probabilities and observed frequencies) and discrimination (ability to discriminate between deferred and approved donors). The models were updated by revising the strength of the individual predictors in the models.
RESULTS: A total of 1,065 men (3.3%) and 2,063 women (9.7%) were deferred from donation because of a low Hb level. Validation in Swiss donors demonstrated underestimation of predicted risks and significantly lower discriminative ability. The predictive effects of most predictors were weaker in Swiss donors. Updating the models increased the calibration for both men and women, and slightly increased the discriminative ability in men.
CONCLUSION: Validation of the Dutch prediction models in Swiss whole blood donors showed lower, though adequate performance. In general, the Dutch prediction models can reliably predict the risk of Hb deferral, although for application in other countries small adaptations are necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood donors; Donor deferral; External validation; Hemoglobin; Prediction model

Year:  2016        PMID: 27994527      PMCID: PMC5159723          DOI: 10.1159/000446817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother        ISSN: 1660-3796            Impact factor:   3.747


  18 in total

1.  Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Gerard J J M Borsboom; Hans C van Houwelingen; Marinus J C Eijkemans; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Andre Pascal Kengne; Mark Woodward; Patrick Royston; Yvonne Vergouwe; Douglas G Altman; Diederick E Grobbee
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Andre Pascal Kengne; Diederick E Grobbee; Patrick Royston; Yvonne Vergouwe; Douglas G Altman; Mark Woodward
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  External validity of risk models: Use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients.

Authors:  Yvonne Vergouwe; Karel G M Moons; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions.

Authors:  Brendan M Reilly; Arthur T Evans
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Douglas G Altman; Yvonne Vergouwe; Patrick Royston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-04

Review 7.  Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review.

Authors:  D B Toll; K J M Janssen; Y Vergouwe; K G M Moons
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  External validation and updating of a Dutch prediction model for low hemoglobin deferral in Irish whole blood donors.

Authors:  A Mireille Baart; Femke Atsma; Ellen N McSweeney; Karel G M Moons; Yvonne Vergouwe; Wim L A M de Kort
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 9.  Nutritional iron deficiency.

Authors:  Michael B Zimmermann; Richard F Hurrell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study.

Authors:  Andrea Marshall; Douglas G Altman; Patrick Royston; Roger L Holder
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.