Literature DB >> 27994452

COPD assessment test score and serum C-reactive protein levels in stable COPD patients.

Hyung Koo Kang1, Kang Kim2, Hyun Lee2, Byeong-Ho Jeong2, Won-Jung Koh2, Hye Yun Park2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An eight-item questionnaire of the COPD assessment test (CAT) is widely used to quantify the impact of COPD on the patient's health status. C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with disease severity and adverse health outcomes of patients with COPD. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between CAT score and serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients.
METHODS: We evaluated the medical records of 226 patients with CAT and serum CRP measured within a week at Samsung Medical Center between October 2013 and October 2015.
RESULTS: Serum CRP levels had a significantly positive relationship with CAT score (Spearman's r=0.20, P=0.003). Patients with elevated serum CRP levels (>0.3 mg/dL) were significantly more likely to have CAT scores of ≥14. The adjusted odds ratio for elevated serum CRP levels in total CAT score was 1.06 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.09). Among CAT components, cough (adjusted P=0.005), phlegm (adjusted P=0.001), breathlessness going up hills/stairs (adjusted P=0.005), low confidence leaving home (adjusted P=0.002), and feeling low in energy (adjusted P=0.019) were independently associated with elevated serum CRP levels.
CONCLUSION: In stable COPD patients, serum CRP levels were independently associated with total CAT score and CAT components related to respiratory symptoms, confidence leaving home, and energy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test; inflammation; quality of life

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27994452      PMCID: PMC5153283          DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S118153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis        ISSN: 1176-9106


Background

COPD is a chronic inflammatory lung disease characterized by progressive airflow limitation and parenchymal destruction.1 It often causes remarkable symptom burden, including chronic cough, sputum production, breathlessness, and exercise intolerance.1–3 The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guideline recommends multiple symptomatic assessments rather than just measuring breathlessness with lung function.1 Among several questionnaires measuring health-related quality of life, the COPD assessment test (CAT) is widely used in routine practice.4–6 It is an easy and simple measurement with an eight-item questionnaire, which is designed to quantify the impact of COPD symptoms on the patient health status with scores of 0–40.4 In clinically stable COPD patients, the CAT is also closely related to the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.7,8 C-reactive protein (CRP) is a representative systemic biomarker reflecting the total systemic burden of inflammation in individuals.9 Serum CRP is elevated in stable COPD, and it correlates with disease severity and adverse health outcomes of patients with mild-to-moderate COPD.10 The Copenhagen City Heart Study and Copenhagen General Population Study showed that increased levels of CRP and other systemic biomarkers were associated with increased risk of COPD exacerbations.11 CAT score is also associated with patients at high risk of exacerbation and changes significantly during and after exacerbations.6,12–14 Moreover, an elevated CAT score at exacerbation reflects exacerbation severity.6 Regarding the relationship between CAT score and CRP, change in CAT score from baseline to exacerbation onset was positively correlated to change in serum CRP.6,13 However, the relationship between the CAT score and the serum CRP levels has not been adequately investigated in stable COPD patients. Thus, we sought to determine the association between CAT score and serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients.

Methods

Subjects

The medical records of 246 COPD patients who took the CAT and had serum CRP levels within 1 week from CAT, at the Samsung Medical Center outpatient clinic from October 2013 to October 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 20 patients with moderate or severe exacerbation at CAT and serum CRP measurements were excluded, and a total of 226 stable COPD patients were included in the present study (Figure 1). The Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study (IRB No. 2015-12-098).
Figure 1

Flow chart for study enrollment.

Abbreviations: CAT, COPD assessment test; CRP, C-reactive protein; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity.

Measurements

Demographic features, smoking history, comorbidities, and current medications, including inhalers, were obtained by reviewing available medical records on the day patients performed the CAT. Comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD), asthma, tuberculosis destroyed lung, and bronchiectasis were reviewed. Patients with CVD were defined as patients who had been diagnosed with myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, and congestive heart failure, including cor pulmonale. Patients with stable COPD were defined as those without moderate or severe exacerbation when CAT score and serum CRP measurements were performed. The moderate or severe exacerbations were defined as a worsening of symptoms that required oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics and/or hospitalization.15 Spirometry was performed according to the joint American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society guidelines.16 Absolute values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were obtained, and the percentage of predicted values (% pred) for FEV1 and FVC were calculated from equations obtained in a representative Korean sample.17 The CAT consists of eight questions for cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness going up hills/stairs, activity limitations at home, confidence leaving home, sleep and energy.7 Each factor is presented on a semantic 6-point (0–5) differential scale, providing a total score of 40.4 The value of serum CRP concentration measured within 1 week before or after CAT was selected for analysis. Serum CRP levels were measured using immunoturbidimetric assays (CRPL3, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and the analytical measurement range was 0.03–35 mg/dL. The elevated serum CRP levels were defined when serum CRP levels were >0.3 mg/dL,18 which is associated with increased risk of CVD.19,20 When subjects underwent more than one CAT and CRP during the study period, data from only the first measurement were used in this analysis.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables and as numbers (%) for categorical variables. Spearman’s correlation and a linear model were used to assess the relationship between CAT score and serum CRP levels. Serum CRP values were dichotomized based on the upper limits of normal range (0.3 mg/dL) to evaluate the relationship between CAT score and increased serum CRP levels. The multiple logistic regression analyses were performed on age, sex, variables with P<0.20 based on univariate results (Table S1) or variables that were generally considered to be associated with CAT or elevated serum CRP levels. The number of comorbidities, including underlying lung disease, was also included as serum CRP levels can be elevated in chronic inflammation caused by noninfectious inflammation disorders. To determine the CAT score associated with elevated serum CRP levels (>0.3 mg/dL), CAT scores were dichotomized from 6 points to 24 points with 2-point intervals. Pearson’s chi-square test was used for these dichotomous variables. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Clinical characteristics of subjects

The clinical characteristics of study participants are summarized in Table 1. The study group included 198 males (87.6%) and 28 females (12.4%), with a median age of 70 years (IQR, 63–75 years). The median body mass index (BMI) was 22.9 kg/m2 (IQR, 20.3–25.0 kg/m2). Thirty-three patients (14.6%) were lifetime never smokers. Median serum CRP level was 0.18 mg/dL (IQR, 0.07–0.57 mg/dL), and 88 patients (38.9%) had serum CRP levels >0.3 mg/dL. The median FEV1 (% pred) was 56% (IQR, 41%–69%), and 93 patients (41.2%) had FEV1 (% pred) <50%. The median number of comorbidities was 1 (IQR, 0–2). Median CAT score was 16 points (IQR, 9–22). The median scales of CAT components are shown in Figure 2.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients (n=226)

CharacteristicsN (%) or median (IQR)
Age, years70 (63–75)
Male198 (87.6)
Body mass index, kg/m222.9 (20.3–25.0)
Smoking status
 Never33 (14.6)
 Ex-smoker156 (69.0)
 Current smoker37 (16.4)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension67 (29.6)
 Diabetes mellitus31 (13.7)
 Cardiovascular disease34 (15.0)
 Asthma39 (17.3)
 TB destroyed lung22 (9.7)
 Bronchiectasis32 (14.2)
 Continuous oxygen therapy3 (1.3)
Biochemical measurements
 C-reactive protein, mg/dL0.18 (0.07–0.57)
 C-reactive protein, >0.3 mg/dL88 (38.9)
Lung function test
 FVC, L3.01 (2.46–3.69)
 FVC, % pred76 (63–88)
 FEV1, L1.58 (1.09–2.02)
 FEV1, % pred56 (41–69)
 FEV1, % pred <5093 (41.2)
Medications
 Inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist162 (71.7)
 Inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist117 (51.8)
 Inhaled corticosteroid95 (42.0)
 Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor14 (6.2)

Abbreviations: % pred, percentage of predicted values; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; IQR, interquartile range; TB, tuberculosis.

Figure 2

The scales of CAT components in 226 patients with stable COPD.

Notes: The score of each CAT component ranges from 0 to 5. aCAT component becomes severe when score goes to 5. bCAT component worsen when score goes to 5.

Abbreviations: CAT, COPD assessment test; IQR, interquartile range.

Relationship between CAT score and serum CRP levels

Correlations between CAT component and serum CRP levels are shown in Table 2. The serum CRP levels had a significant positive relationship with total CAT score (Spearman’s r=0.199, P=0.003). Among CAT components, serum CRP levels were significantly correlated with cough (Spearman’s r=0.153, P=0.021), phlegm (Spearman’s r=0.184, P=0.006), breathlessness going up hills/stairs (Spearman’s r=0.161, P=0.015), low confidence leaving home (Spearman’s r=0.254, P<0.001), and feeling low in energy (Spearman’s r=0.180, P=0.007). There were no significant relationships between serum CRP levels and chest tightness, activity limitations at home, or sleep (Table 3).
Table 2

Correlation between COPD assessment test score and serum CRP levels

CoughaPhlegmaChest tightnessaBreathlessness going up hills/stairsaActivity at homebConfidence leaving homebSleepbEnergybTotal
CRP
R0.1530.1840.0640.1610.0300.2540.0310.1800.199
P-value0.0210.0060.3350.0150.649<0.0010.6450.0070.003

Notes:

CAT component becomes severe when score goes to 5.

CAT component worsen when score goes to 5.

Abbreviation: CRP, C-reactive protein.

Table 3

Relationship between COPD assessment test score and elevated serum CRP levels (>0.3 mg/dL)

CAT componentUnadjusted OR (95% CI)P-valueAdjusted OR* (95% CI)P-value
Cougha1.30 (1.07–1.60)0.0101.38 (1.10–1.72)0.005
Phlegma1.33 (1.11–1.61)0.0021.38 (1.13–1.68)0.001
Chest tightnessa1.14 (0.97–1.35)0.1201.18 (0.99–1.41)0.062
Breathlessness going up hills/stairsa1.37 (1.13–1.66)0.0021.35 (1.09–1.66)0.005
Activity limitations at homeb1.02 (0.88–1.18)0.8080.97 (0.83–1.14)0.728
Confidence leaving homeb1.34 (1.15–1.55)<0.0011.29 (1.09–1.52)0.002
Sleepb1.14 (0.97–1.34)0.1061.14 (0.96–1.35)0.141
Energyb1.31 (1.10–1.55)0.0021.25 (1.04–1.50)0.019
Total1.06 (1.03–1.09)0.0011.06 (1.02–1.09)0.002

Notes:

Adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, FEV1, and number of comorbidities.

CAT component becomes severe when score goes to 5.

CAT component worsen when score goes to 5.

Abbreviations: CAT, COPD assessment test; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; OR, odds ratio.

Relationship between CAT score and elevated serum CRP levels

As shown in Table 3, total CAT score was an independent factor associated with having elevated serum CRP levels after adjustment for covariates, including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, FEV1 (% pred), and number of comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.09). The aORs of cough, phlegm, breathlessness, low confidence leaving home, and feeling low in energy for elevated serum CRP levels were 1.38 (95% CI, 1.10–1.72), 1.38 (95% CI, 1.13–1.68), 1.35 (95% CI, 1.09–1.66), 1.29 (95% CI, 1.09–1.52), and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.04–1.50), respectively. Regarding relationship of elevated serum CRP levels with CAT component, there were no significant relationships between elevated serum CRP levels and chest tightness, activity limitations at home, or sleep.

The points of total CAT score associated with elevated serum CRP levels

The CAT scores were dichotomized from 6 points to 24 points with 2-point intervals. Patients with elevated serum CRP levels significantly increased from 14 points to 24 points compared with the other group (serum CRP level ≤0.3 mg/dL). The P-values for elevated serum CRP levels with 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 points were 0.012, 0.004, 0.003, 0.034, 0.003, and <0.001, respectively. However, there were no significant relationships of elevated serum CRP levels with CAT scores of 6, 8, 10, and 12 points (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Proportions of patients with elevated serum CRP levels (>0.3 mg/dL) according to the CAT cutoff value.

Note: *P-value <0.05.

Abbreviations: CAT, COPD assessment test; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Discussion

In the present study, we found that serum CRP levels were independently associated with total CAT score in stable COPD patients. Among CAT components, this positive relationship was shown with cough, phlegm, breathlessness going up hills/stairs, low confidence leaving home, and feeling low in energy. The proportion of patients with elevated serum CRP levels significantly increased with 14 points of total CAT, suggesting that CAT score is a useful indicator to predict systemic inflammation in stable COPD patients. CAT is a validated health status questionnaire designed to quantify the impact of COPD symptoms.4 Previous studies showed that this instrument provides reliable scores for predicting COPD exacerbation and severity, suggesting the CAT as a potential tool for the stratification of patients who are at risk for exacerbations.6,13,14 Systemic inflammation is measured by plasma fibrinogen and serum CRP, which are increased in COPD and aggravated during exacerbations.11 Accordingly, several studies demonstrated that CRP is elevated corresponding to increased CAT score during exacerbations.6,13 In stable COPD, our study showed that CAT score is also independently associated with elevated serum CRP levels even after adjusting for confounding factors, although this statistical relationship is weak. Elevated CRP levels can occur in association with chronic inflammation caused by noninfectious inflammation disorders, such as CVD,9,18,21 and patients with COPD often have significant extrapulmonary comorbidities contributing to symptoms.1 Thus, the number of comorbidities was additionally adjusted, and we found that the positive relationship between CAT score and serum CRP levels was preserved in stable COPD patients. In particular, there are significantly more patients with elevated serum CRP levels, when CAT scores are ≥14. According to the guidelines, a CAT score of ≥10 or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade ≥2 is categorized as the “more symptomatic group”.1 However, there is increasing recognition that a CAT cutoff value of 10 could overestimate the symptom severity compared with an mMRC cutoff value of 2.22,23 Recent data using the Korean COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) cohort also reported that a CAT score of 15 is concordant with mMRC grade ≥2.24 This is in line with our findings showing a significant relationship between elevated serum CRP levels and CAT scores of ≥14. In addition to total CAT score, we showed that certain CAT components related to respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm, breathlessness going up hills/stairs), confidence leaving home, and energy were associated with increased levels of serum CRP. This is consistent with the characteristics of COPD, which is associated with an enhanced chronic inflammatory response in the airways, parenchyma, and pulmonary vasculature,25,26 and with low-grade systemic inflammation with increased levels of systemic inflammatory markers, such as CRP, fibrinogen, leukocytes, and TNF-α. With interlinking relationships, the present study suggests that increased CAT score can reflect systemic inflammation as well as inflamed respiratory symptoms in stable COPD.27 Our study has several limitations. First, given the observational nature of the study, there is always the possibility that selection bias or confounding might have influenced our findings. Second, as blood samples were not collected for this study, we could not evaluate other systemic biomarkers, such as fibrinogen, interleukin-6, and TNF-α. Further studies investigating the relationships of those systemic biomarkers with CAT scores would be informative to reinforce the relationship between inflammation and CAT score in stable COPD patients. Third, because this is a cross-sectional study, further investigation is needed to determine intraindividual variation of the association between CAT scores and serum CRP levels over time.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrated an independent association between CAT score and serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients. This relationship was most obvious in CAT components related to respiratory symptoms, confidence leaving home, and energy. The results suggest that CAT score can be a reliable indicator that incorporate both lung and systemic inflammation in stable COPD patients. Clinical characteristics according to serum CRP levels Notes: The data are presented as median and interquartile range, or as number (%), and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-squared test for categorical variables. Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Table S1

Clinical characteristics according to serum CRP levels

CharacteristicSerum CRP levels ≤0.3 mg/dLSerum CRP levels >0.3 mg/dLP-value
Age, years69 (63–75)71 (64–76)0.25
Male119 (86.2)79 (89.8)0.43
Body mass index, kg/m223.1 (20.6–25.2)22.5 (19.5–24.9)0.15
Smoking status0.23
 Never18 (13.0)15 (17.0)
 Ex-smoker93 (67.4)63 (71.6)
 Current smoker27 (19.6)10 (11.4)
FEV1, L1.68 (1.19–2.07)1.41 (0.92–1.91)0.01
Number of comorbidities1 (0–2)1 (0–2)0.97

Notes: The data are presented as median and interquartile range, or as number (%), and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-squared test for categorical variables.

Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

  26 in total

Review 1.  Immunologic aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Manuel G Cosio; Marina Saetta; Alvar Agusti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  COPD assessment test --rationale, development, validation and performance.

Authors:  Paul W Jones
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  Properties of the COPD assessment test in a cross-sectional European study.

Authors:  P W Jones; G Brusselle; R W Dal Negro; M Ferrer; P Kardos; M L Levy; T Perez; J J Soler Cataluña; T van der Molen; L Adamek; N Banik
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 4.  Toward a consensus definition for COPD exacerbations.

Authors:  R Rodriguez-Roisin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  What does minor elevation of C-reactive protein signify?

Authors:  Irving Kushner; Debra Rzewnicki; David Samols
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Inflammation and atherosclerosis: role of C-reactive protein in risk assessment.

Authors:  Peter Libby; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Inflammatory biomarkers and exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Mette Thomsen; Truls Sylvan Ingebrigtsen; Jacob Louis Marott; Morten Dahl; Peter Lange; Jørgen Vestbo; Børge G Nordestgaard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test.

Authors:  P W Jones; G Harding; P Berry; I Wiklund; W-H Chen; N Kline Leidy
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test scores corresponding to modified Medical Research Council grades among COPD patients.

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Lee; Jinwoo Lee; Young Sik Park; Sang-Min Lee; Jae-Joon Yim; Young Whan Kim; Sung Koo Han; Chul-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  A Validation Study for the Korean Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT).

Authors:  Yong Il Hwang; Ki-Suck Jung; Seong-Yong Lim; Yil-Seob Lee; Nam-Hee Kwon
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2013-06-25
View more
  4 in total

1.  Blood biomarkers as predictors of long-term mortality in COPD.

Authors:  Angelico Mendy; Erick Forno; Theophile Niyonsenga; Janvier Gasana
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  Is Osteoporosis a Common Comorbidity in Different Chronic Airway Diseases?

Authors:  Seung Hyeun Lee
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2017-12-13

3.  Risk Factors for Depression in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Kang Xu; Xiu Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-03-08

4.  Inflammatory and Metabolic Responses to Different Resistance Training on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Bruna S de Alencar Silva; Fábio S Lira; Fabrício E Rossi; Dionei Ramos; Juliana S Uzeloto; Ana P C F Freire; Fabiano F de Lima; Luís A Gobbo; Ercy M C Ramos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.