Literature DB >> 27994126

Waiting in the wings: what can we learn about gene co-option from the diversification of butterfly wing patterns?

Chris D Jiggins1, Richard W R Wallbank2, Joseph J Hanly2.   

Abstract

A major challenge is to understand how conserved gene regulatory networks control the wonderful diversity of form that we see among animals and plants. Butterfly wing patterns are an excellent example of this diversity. Butterfly wings form as imaginal discs in the caterpillar and are constructed by a gene regulatory network, much of which is conserved across the holometabolous insects. Recent work in Heliconius butterflies takes advantage of genomic approaches and offers insights into how the diversification of wing patterns is overlaid onto this conserved network. WntA is a patterning morphogen that alters spatial information in the wing. Optix is a transcription factor that acts later in development to paint specific wing regions red. Both of these loci fit the paradigm of conserved protein-coding loci with diverse regulatory elements and developmental roles that have taken on novel derived functions in patterning wings. These discoveries offer insights into the 'Nymphalid Ground Plan', which offers a unifying hypothesis for pattern formation across nymphalid butterflies. These loci also represent 'hotspots' for morphological change that have been targeted repeatedly during evolution. Both convergent and divergent evolution of a great diversity of patterns is controlled by complex alleles at just a few genes. We suggest that evolutionary change has become focused on one or a few genetic loci for two reasons. First, pre-existing complex cis-regulatory loci that already interact with potentially relevant transcription factors are more likely to acquire novel functions in wing patterning. Second, the shape of wing regulatory networks may constrain evolutionary change to one or a few loci. Overall, genomic approaches that have identified wing patterning loci in these butterflies offer broad insight into how gene regulatory networks evolve to produce diversity.This article is part of the themed issue 'Evo-devo in the genomics era, and the origins of morphological diversity'.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lepidoptera; adaptive radiation; cis-regulatory evolution; evo-devo; gene regulatory networks; mimicry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27994126      PMCID: PMC5182417          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  63 in total

Review 1.  The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations.

Authors:  Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly wing pattern mimicry.

Authors:  Robert D Reed; Riccardo Papa; Arnaud Martin; Heather M Hines; Brian A Counterman; Carolina Pardo-Diaz; Chris D Jiggins; Nicola L Chamberlain; Marcus R Kronforst; Rui Chen; Georg Halder; H Frederik Nijhout; W Owen McMillan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Dynamics of F-actin prefigure the structure of butterfly wing scales.

Authors:  April Dinwiddie; Ryan Null; Maria Pizzano; Lisa Chuong; Alexis Leigh Krup; Hwei Ee Tan; Nipam H Patel
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Pattern-specific expression of the Drosophila decapentaplegic gene in imaginal disks is regulated by 3' cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  J D Masucci; R J Miltenberger; F M Hoffmann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Gene expression underlying adaptive variation in Heliconius wing patterns: non-modular regulation of overlapping cinnabar and vermilion prepatterns.

Authors:  Robert D Reed; W Owen McMillan; Lisa M Nagy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution.

Authors:  D N Keys; D L Lewis; J E Selegue; B J Pearson; L V Goodrich; R L Johnson; J Gates; M P Scott; S B Carroll
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Morphological evolution caused by many subtle-effect substitutions in regulatory DNA.

Authors:  Nicolás Frankel; Deniz F Erezyilmaz; Alistair P McGregor; Shu Wang; François Payre; David L Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Comparative insights into questions of lepidopteran wing pattern homology.

Authors:  Antónia Monteiro; Gary Glaser; Steven Stockslager; Nelleke Glansdorp; Diane Ramos
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  Functional evolution of a cis-regulatory module.

Authors:  Michael Z Ludwig; Arnar Palsson; Elena Alekseeva; Casey M Bergman; Janaki Nathan; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Ancient homology underlies adaptive mimetic diversity across butterflies.

Authors:  Jason R Gallant; Vance E Imhoff; Arnaud Martin; Wesley K Savage; Nicola L Chamberlain; Ben L Pote; Chelsea Peterson; Gabriella E Smith; Benjamin Evans; Robert D Reed; Marcus R Kronforst; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  14 in total

1.  Lateral Gene Transfer Acts As an Evolutionary Shortcut to Efficient C4 Biochemistry.

Authors:  Chatchawal Phansopa; Luke T Dunning; James D Reid; Pascal-Antoine Christin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  The rewiring of transcription circuits in evolution.

Authors:  Alexander D Johnson
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Single master regulatory gene coordinates the evolution and development of butterfly color and iridescence.

Authors:  Linlin Zhang; Anyi Mazo-Vargas; Robert D Reed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The genetic and molecular architecture of phenotypic diversity in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Catherine L Peichel; David A Marques
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Perspectives on the history of evo-devo and the contemporary research landscape in the genomics era.

Authors:  Cheryll Tickle; Araxi O Urrutia
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evolutionary Divergence and Radula Diversification in Two Ecomorphs from an Adaptive Radiation of Freshwater Snails.

Authors:  Leon Hilgers; Stefanie Hartmann; Jobst Pfaender; Nora Lentge-Maaß; Ristiyanti M Marwoto; Thomas von Rintelen; Michael Hofreiter
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  The evolution and genetics of sexually dimorphic 'dual' mimicry in the butterfly Elymnias hypermnestra.

Authors:  Dee M Ruttenberg; Nicholas W VanKuren; Sumitha Nallu; Shen-Horn Yen; Djunijanti Peggie; David J Lohman; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Highly Expressed Genes Are Preferentially Co-Opted for C4 Photosynthesis.

Authors:  Jose J Moreno-Villena; Luke T Dunning; Colin P Osborne; Pascal-Antoine Christin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Conservation and flexibility in the gene regulatory landscape of heliconiine butterfly wings.

Authors:  Joseph J Hanly; Richard W R Wallbank; W Owen McMillan; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  The mimetic wing pattern of Papilio polytes butterflies is regulated by a doublesex-orchestrated gene network.

Authors:  Takuro Iijima; Shinichi Yoda; Haruhiko Fujiwara
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.