Literature DB >> 27993898

GPs' opinions of health assessment instruments for people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study.

Esther J Bakker-van Gijssel1, Tim C Olde Hartman2, Peter Lbj Lucassen2, Francine van den Driessen Mareeuw3, Marianne K Dees4, Willem Jj Assendelft2, Henny Mj van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: GPs provide health care to people with intellectual disabilities (ID). People with ID find it difficult to express themselves concerning health-related matters. Applying health assessments is an effective method to reveal health needs, and can play a role in prevention and health promotion. AIM: The aim of this qualitative study was to explore GPs' considerations about applying a health assessment for people with ID. DESIGN AND
SETTING: This focus group study was conducted among a selection of Dutch GPs.
METHOD: An interview guide was developed. All discussions were audiorecorded and transcribed. Analysis was performed using the framework analysis approach. Two researchers independently applied open coding and identified a thematic framework. This framework and the summaries of views per theme were discussed in the research team.
RESULTS: After four focus groups, with 23 GPs, saturation was reached. Three main themes evolved: health assessments in relation to GPs' responsibility; the usefulness and necessity of health assessments; and barriers to using health assessments on people with ID. A health assessment instrument for people with ID can help GPs to focus on certain issues that are not so common in the general population. GPs are motivated to use such a tool if it is scientifically tested, and results in significant health gains. However, GPs identify barriers at the level of GP, patient, and organisation.
CONCLUSION: Most GPs in the focus groups consider providing medical care to people with ID their responsibility and indicate that a health assessment instrument could be a valuable tool. In order to deliver good care, they need education and support. Many barriers need to be overcome before a health assessment instrument can be implemented. © British Journal of General Practice 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  focus groups; general practice; intellectual disability; primary health care; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27993898      PMCID: PMC5198622          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X688585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  24 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  General practitioners' views on perceived and actual gains, benefits and barriers associated with the implementation of an Australian health assessment for people with intellectual disability.

Authors:  N G Lennox; C E Brolan; J Dean; R S Ware; F M Boyle; M Taylor Gomez; K van Dooren; C Bain
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2012-07-10

3.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 4.  Effects of health screening for adults with intellectual disability: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Lennox; Robert Ware; Chris Bain; Miriam Taylor Gomez; Sally-Ann Cooper
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Attitudes of general practitioners towards health care for people with intellectual disability and the factors underlying these attitudes.

Authors:  L Bond; M Kerr; F Dunstan; A Thapar
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  1997-10

6.  Stakeholders' Perspectives towards the Use of the Comprehensive Health Assessment Program (CHAP) for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities in Manitoba.

Authors:  Shahin Shooshtari; Beverley Temple; Celeste Waldman; Sneha Abraham; Héléne Ouellette-Kuntz; Nicholas Lennox
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2016-06-09

7.  Comprehensive health assessments during de-institutionalization: an observational study.

Authors:  N Lennox; T Rey-Conde; N Cooling
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2006-10

8.  Optimizing the uptake of health checks for people with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Roy McConkey; Laurence Taggart; Molly Kane
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil       Date:  2015-01-20

9.  Practice nurse health checks for adults with intellectual disabilities: a cluster-design, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sally-Ann Cooper; Jill Morrison; Linda M Allan; Alex McConnachie; Nicola Greenlaw; Craig A Melville; Marion C Baltzer; Laura A McArthur; Claire Lammie; Gordon Martin; Eleanor A D Grieve; Elisabeth Fenwick
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 27.083

10.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Gemma Heath; Elaine Cameron; Sabina Rashid; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Health checks for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in a family practice.

Authors:  Ian Casson; Terry Broda; Janet Durbin; Angela Gonzales; Laurie Green; Elizabeth Grier; Yona Lunsky; Avra Selick; Kyle Sue
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Capturing the complexity of healthcare for people with Down syndrome in quality indicators - a Delphi study involving healthcare professionals and patient organisations.

Authors:  Francine A van den Driessen Mareeuw; Antonia M W Coppus; Diana M J Delnoij; Esther de Vries
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Improving knowledge of psychotropic prescribing in people with Intellectual Disability in primary care.

Authors:  Rohit Shankar; Mike Wilcock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.