T H Ho1, D J Serie2, M Parasramka3, J C Cheville4, B M Bot5, W Tan6, L Wang7, R W Joseph6, T Hilton2, B C Leibovich8, A S Parker2, J E Eckel-Passow7. 1. Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, USA. 2. Departments of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 3. Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA. 4. Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA. 5. Computational Oncology, Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, USA. 6. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 7. Department of Pathology, Medical College of Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei Province, China. 8. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Abstract
Background: The majority of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) studies analyze primary tumors, and the corresponding results are extrapolated to metastatic RCC tumors. However, it is unknown if gene expression profiles from primary RCC tumors differs from patient-matched metastatic tumors. Thus, we sought to identify differentially expressed genes between patient-matched primary and metastatic RCC tumors in order to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of RCC metastases. Patients and methods: We compared gene expression profiles between patient-matched primary and metastatic RCC tumors using a two-stage design. First, we used Affymetrix microarrays on 15 pairs of primary RCC [14 clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 1 papillary] tumors and patient-matched pulmonary metastases. Second, we used a custom NanoString panel to validate seven candidate genes in an independent cohort of 114 ccRCC patients. Differential gene expression was evaluated using a mixed effect linear model; a random effect denoting patient was included to account for the paired data. Third, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data were used to evaluate associations with metastasis-free and overall survival in primary ccRCC tumors. Results: We identified and validated up regulation of seven genes functionally involved in the formation of the extracellular matrix (ECM): DCN, SLIT2, LUM, LAMA2, ADAMTS12, CEACAM6 and LMO3. In primary ccRCC, CEACAM6 and LUM were significantly associated with metastasis-free and overall survival (P < 0.01). Conclusions: We evaluated gene expression profiles using the largest set to date, to our knowledge, of patient-matched primary and metastatic ccRCC tumors and identified up regulation of ECM genes in metastases. Our study implicates up regulation of ECM genes as a critical molecular event leading to visceral, bone and soft tissue metastases in ccRCC.
Background: The majority of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) studies analyze primary tumors, and the corresponding results are extrapolated to metastatic RCC tumors. However, it is unknown if gene expression profiles from primary RCC tumors differs from patient-matched metastatic tumors. Thus, we sought to identify differentially expressed genes between patient-matched primary and metastatic RCC tumors in order to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of RCC metastases. Patients and methods: We compared gene expression profiles between patient-matched primary and metastatic RCC tumors using a two-stage design. First, we used Affymetrix microarrays on 15 pairs of primary RCC [14 clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 1 papillary] tumors and patient-matched pulmonary metastases. Second, we used a custom NanoString panel to validate seven candidate genes in an independent cohort of 114 ccRCC patients. Differential gene expression was evaluated using a mixed effect linear model; a random effect denoting patient was included to account for the paired data. Third, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data were used to evaluate associations with metastasis-free and overall survival in primary ccRCC tumors. Results: We identified and validated up regulation of seven genes functionally involved in the formation of the extracellular matrix (ECM): DCN, SLIT2, LUM, LAMA2, ADAMTS12, CEACAM6 and LMO3. In primary ccRCC, CEACAM6 and LUM were significantly associated with metastasis-free and overall survival (P < 0.01). Conclusions: We evaluated gene expression profiles using the largest set to date, to our knowledge, of patient-matched primary and metastatic ccRCC tumors and identified up regulation of ECM genes in metastases. Our study implicates up regulation of ECM genes as a critical molecular event leading to visceral, bone and soft tissue metastases in ccRCC.
Authors: E Élez; I Kocáková; T Höhler; U M Martens; C Bokemeyer; E Van Cutsem; B Melichar; M Smakal; T Csőszi; E Topuzov; R Orlova; S Tjulandin; F Rivera; J Straub; R Bruns; S Quaratino; J Tabernero Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Saeed Dabestani; Lorenzo Marconi; Fabian Hofmann; Fiona Stewart; Thomas B L Lam; Steven E Canfield; Michael Staehler; Thomas Powles; Börje Ljungberg; Axel Bex Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-10-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Farhad Kosari; Alexander S Parker; Dagmar Marie Kube; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; George Vasmatzis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Andrzej B Popławski; Michał Jankowski; Stephen W Erickson; Teresita Díaz de Ståhl; E Christopher Partridge; Chiquito Crasto; Jingyu Guo; John Gibson; Uwe Menzel; Carl Eg Bruder; Aneta Kaczmarczyk; Magdalena Benetkiewicz; Robin Andersson; Johanna Sandgren; Barbara Zegarska; Dariusz Bała; Ewa Srutek; David B Allison; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Wojciech Zegarski; Jan P Dumanski Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Abhijit G Banerjee; Indraneel Bhattacharyya; William M Lydiatt; Jamboor K Vishwanatha Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Thierry Gorlia; Sara C Erridge; James Perry; Yong-Kil Hong; Kenneth D Aldape; Benoit Lhermitte; Torsten Pietsch; Danica Grujicic; Joachim Peter Steinbach; Wolfgang Wick; Rafał Tarnawski; Do-Hyun Nam; Peter Hau; Astrid Weyerbrock; Martin J B Taphoorn; Chiung-Chyi Shen; Nalini Rao; László Thurzo; Ulrich Herrlinger; Tejpal Gupta; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Krystyna Adamska; Catherine McBain; Alba A Brandes; Joerg Christian Tonn; Oliver Schnell; Thomas Wiegel; Chae-Yong Kim; Louis Burt Nabors; David A Reardon; Martin J van den Bent; Christine Hicking; Andriy Markivskyy; Martin Picard; Michael Weller Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Amber L Fifield; Paul D Hanavan; Douglas O Faigel; Eduard Sergienko; Andrey Bobkov; Nathalie Meurice; Joachim L Petit; Alysia Polito; Thomas R Caulfield; Erik P Castle; John A Copland; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Krishnendu Pal; Shamit K Dutta; Huijun Luo; Thai H Ho; Douglas F Lake Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Guillermo de Velasco; Stephanie A Wankowicz; Russell Madison; Siraj M Ali; Craig Norton; Audrey Duquette; Jeffrey S Ross; Dominick Bossé; Aly-Khan A Lalani; Vincent A Miller; Philip J Stephens; Lauren Young; A Ari Hakimi; Sabina Signoretti; Sumanta K Pal; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 7.640