Literature DB >> 27993742

Immediate Titanium Mesh Implantation for Patients with Postcraniotomy Neurosurgical Site Infections: Safe and Aesthetic Alternative Procedure?

Gregory Ehrlich1, Stefanie Kindling2, Holger Wenz3, Daniel Hänggi2, Dirk Michael Schulte2, Peter Schmiedek2, Marcel Seiz-Rosenhagen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the main complications after craniotomy. The incidence is up to 11% in the literature. The established procedure is debridement, removal of the bone flap, and delayed cranioplasty. Delayed cranioplasty has several disadvantages. A promising approach is the immediate titanium mesh implantation at the time of wound revision. We report our experience with this technique regarding outcome measured by reinfection rates and patient satisfaction.
METHODS: Patients treated in our department from January 2013 to October 2014 with SSI after craniotomy for brain tumor, trauma, or vascular pathologies were prospectively collected. In all these patients, immediate titanium mesh implantation after bone flap removal was performed. Primary outcome parameters were the reinfection rate and patient satisfaction via self-designed questionnaires in a follow-up period >3 months.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included within the study period. Main risk factors causing SSI were previous steroid medication (62.5%), cranial radiation therapy (42%), cerebrospinal fluid fistula after initial surgery (12.5%), and diabetes mellitus (25%). The follow-up was >3 months after titanium mesh cranioplasty (mean 4.6 months; range 3-6 months). No recurrent infection was detected in the study group. In 2 cases, reoperation was necessary. The returning questionnaires showed a high satisfaction rate with the cosmetic result.
CONCLUSIONS: Our small series seems to confirm that immediate titanium mesh implantation for patients with postcraniotomy SSI is a cost-effective, safe, and cosmetically suitable alternative to delayed cranioplasty in selected patients without hydrocephalus or persistent cerebrospinal fluid fistula.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranioplasty; Patient satisfaction; Surgical site infection; Titanium mesh

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27993742     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  2 in total

1.  Timing of cranial reconstruction after cranioplasty infections: are we ready for a re-thinking? A comparative analysis of delayed versus immediate cranioplasty after debridement in a series of 48 patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Rienzo; Roberto Colasanti; Maurizio Gladi; Mauro Dobran; Martina Della Costanza; Mara Capece; Salvatore Veccia; Maurizio Iacoangeli
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh.

Authors:  Domenico Policicchio; Gina Casu; Giosuè Dipellegrini; Artan Doda; Giampiero Muggianu; Riccardo Boccaletti
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-06-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.