Isabel Miguel Montoya1, Rafael Ortí Lucas2, Esperanza Ferrer Ferrándiz3, David Martín Baena4, Raimunda Montejano Lozoya3. 1. Escuela de Enfermería La Fe, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España. Electronic address: demiguel_@gva.es. 2. Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, España. 3. Escuela de Enfermería La Fe, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España. 4. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Área de Desigualdades en Salud, FISABIO, Valencia, España.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the nutritional status of a population of hospitalized patients, divided into 2 different groups, both at admission and hospital discharge, and to assess the influence of nutritional alteration during the hospital stay. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Quasi-experimental study comprising 2 groups of patients (N=581); an intervention group (n=303), in which nurses receivedspecific training on managing care methodology, and a control group (n=278), in which nurses continued their usual dynamics. Each group was made up of 2 care units with patients from both surgical and medical specialties. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients admitted to the selected units with a minimum stay of 5 days. The sample selection was performed prospectively and consecutively after implementing the training. RESULTS: Of the 581 patients studied, 49.4% were women and 50.6% were men. Mean patient age was 68.29 (SD 16.23) years. In the intervention group, the odds ratio (OR) associated with good nutritional status was multiplied by 1.7 (OR=1.67) compared to the control group in the first evaluation and by 1.4 times (OR=1.43) at hospital discharge. The average stay in days was higher in the control group (13.71, SD 10.19) than in the intervention group (10.89, SD 7.49) (P<.001). CONCLUSION: The systematic methodology-based intervention in the chosen units was positive. Patients admitted to the intervention units had a lower nutritional alteration and a shorter hospital stay than those admitted to the control units.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the nutritional status of a population of hospitalized patients, divided into 2 different groups, both at admission and hospital discharge, and to assess the influence of nutritional alteration during the hospital stay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Quasi-experimental study comprising 2 groups of patients (N=581); an intervention group (n=303), in which nurses received specific training on managing care methodology, and a control group (n=278), in which nurses continued their usual dynamics. Each group was made up of 2 care units with patients from both surgical and medical specialties. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients admitted to the selected units with a minimum stay of 5 days. The sample selection was performed prospectively and consecutively after implementing the training. RESULTS: Of the 581 patients studied, 49.4% were women and 50.6% were men. Mean patient age was 68.29 (SD 16.23) years. In the intervention group, the odds ratio (OR) associated with good nutritional status was multiplied by 1.7 (OR=1.67) compared to the control group in the first evaluation and by 1.4 times (OR=1.43) at hospital discharge. The average stay in days was higher in the control group (13.71, SD 10.19) than in the intervention group (10.89, SD 7.49) (P<.001). CONCLUSION: The systematic methodology-based intervention in the chosen units was positive. Patients admitted to the intervention units had a lower nutritional alteration and a shorter hospital stay than those admitted to the control units.