Literature DB >> 27993064

Effects of Cellular Sorption on Mercury Bioavailability and Methylmercury Production by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132.

Yu-Rong Liu1,2, Xia Lu2, Linduo Zhao2, Jing An2, Ji-Zheng He1,3, Eric M Pierce2, Alexander Johs2, Baohua Gu2.   

Abstract

Microbial conversion of inorganic mercury (IHg) to methylmercury (MeHg) is a significant environmental concern because of the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of toxic MeHg in the food web. Laboratory incubation studies have shown that, despite the presence of large quantities of IHg in cell cultures, MeHg biosynthesis often reaches a plateau or a maximum within hours or a day by an as yet unexplained mechanism. Here we report that mercuric Hg(II) can be taken up rapidly by cells of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132, but a large fraction of the Hg(II) is unavailable for methylation because of strong cellular sorption. Thiols, such as cysteine, glutathione, and penicillamine, added either simultaneously with Hg(II) or after cells have been exposed to Hg(II), effectively desorb or mobilize the bound Hg(II), leading to a substantial increase in MeHg production. The amount of thiol-desorbed Hg(II) is strongly correlated to the amount of MeHg produced (r = 0.98). However, cells do not preferentially take up Hg(II)-thiol complexes, but Hg(II)-ligand exchange between these complexes and the cell-associated proteins likely constrains Hg(II) uptake and methylation. We suggest that, aside from aqueous chemical speciation of Hg(II), binding and exchange of Hg(II) between cells and complexing ligands such as thiols and naturally dissolved organics in solution is an important controlling mechanism of Hg(II) bioavailability, which should be considered when predicting MeHg production in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27993064     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Purification of water contaminated with Hg using horizontal subsurface constructed wetlands.

Authors:  Rajendra Prasad Singh; Jiaguo Wu; Dafang Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Kinetics of Enzymatic Mercury Methylation at Nanomolar Concentrations Catalyzed by HgcAB.

Authors:  Swapneeta S Date; Jerry M Parks; Katherine W Rush; Judy D Wall; Stephen W Ragsdale; Alexander Johs
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Organomercurial Lyase (MerB)-Mediated Demethylation Decreases Bacterial Methylmercury Resistance in the Absence of Mercuric Reductase (MerA).

Authors:  Ian N Krout; Thomas Scrimale; Daria Vorojeikina; Eric S Boyd; Matthew D Rand
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.005

4.  Synergistic Effects of a Chalkophore, Methanobactin, on Microbial Methylation of Mercury.

Authors:  Xixiang Yin; Lihong Wang; Lijie Zhang; Hongmei Chen; Xujun Liang; Xia Lu; Alan A DiSpirito; Jeremy D Semrau; Baohua Gu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Methylmercury uptake and degradation by methanotrophs.

Authors:  Xia Lu; Wenyu Gu; Linduo Zhao; Muhammad Farhan Ul Haque; Alan A DiSpirito; Jeremy D Semrau; Baohua Gu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.